RESUMO
Kita is a health district of Mali, a leprosy-endemic country in West Africa. We conducted a comparative study of passive and active case finding of leprosy in this district in 1997. In May and June, a mobile team realized active case finding by visiting 32 villages of more than 1000 inhabitants. For 12 months, peripheral health center nurses did passive detection after information and education sessions about the signs of leprosy in the other 37 main villages of Kita. The active detection rate (4.31 per 10,000) was threefold higher than the passive rate (1.5 per 10,000) and allowed us to find earlier cases of leprosy. Active case finding identified children and single-lesion disease; the passive method did not. Cost for finding a new case was estimated at 72 US$ by mobile team detection and 36 US$ by passive case finding. Although the active method looked more expensive than the passive one, it was the only effective strategy to detect leprosy patients in remote and difficult-to-access areas. Based upon the results of the study, a flow chart is proposed for the choice of case-finding method when designing a leprosy elimination program.
Assuntos
Hanseníase/diagnóstico , Mycobacterium leprae/isolamento & purificação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Hanseníase/epidemiologia , Mali/epidemiologia , Mycobacterium leprae/patogenicidade , População RuralRESUMO
Kita is a health district of Mali, a leprosy-endemic country in West Africa. We conducted a comparative study of passive and active case finding of leprosy in this district in 1997. In May and June, a mobile team realized active case finding by visiting 32 villages of more than 1000 inhabitants. For 12 months, peripheral health center nurses did passive detection after information and education sessions about the signs of leprosy in the other 37 main villages of Kita. The active detection rate (4.31 per 10,000) was threefold higher than the passive rate (1.5 per 10,000) and allowed us to find earlier cases of leprosy. Active case finding identified children and single-lesion disease; the passive method did not. Cost for finding a new case was estimated at 72 US$ by mobile team detection and 36 US$ by passive case finding. Although the active method looked more expensive than the passive one, it was the only effective strategy to detect leprosy patients in remote and difficult-to-access areas. Based upon the results of the study, a flow chart is proposed for the choice of case-finding method when designing a leprosy elimination program.
