RESUMO
The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in assessing penile cancer is not well defined. However, this modality may be successfully applied for preoperative staging and patient selection; postoperative local and regional surveillance; and assessments of treatment response after oncological therapies. Previous studies have been mostly limited to a few small series evaluating the accuracy of MRI for the preoperative staging of penile cancer. This review discusses the principles of non-erectile mpMRI, including functional techniques and their applications in evaluating the male genital region, along with clinical protocols and technical considerations. The latest clinical classifications and guidelines are reviewed, focusing on imaging recommendations and discussing potential gaps and disadvantages. The development of functional MRI techniques and the extraction of quantitative parameters from these sequences enables the noninvasive assessment of phenotypic and genotypic tumor characteristics. The applications of advanced techniques in penile MRI are yet to be defined. There is a need for prospective trials and feasible multicenter trials due to the rarity of the disease, highlighting the importance of minimum technical requirements for MRI protocols, particularly image resolution, and finally determining the role of mpMRI in the assessment of penile cancer.
RESUMO
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of non-erectile multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for preoperative assessment of primary penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Method: Twenty-five patients who underwent surgery for penile SCC were included. Preoperative mpMRI without artificial erection was performed in all patients. The preoperative MRI protocol consisted of high-resolution morphological and functional sequences (diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion) covering the penis and lower pelvis. T and N staging, according to the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification, as well as the largest diameter and thickness/infiltration depth of the primary lesions were determined in all patients. Imaging data were retrospectively collected and compared with the final histopathology reports. Results: Very good agreement was observed between MRI and histopathology for the involvement of corpus spongiosum (p = 0.002) and good agreement was observed for the involvement of penile urethra and tunica albuginea/corpus cavernosum (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). Good agreement was observed between MRI and histopathology for overall T staging and weaker, but still good agreement was observed for N staging (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). A strong and significant correlation was observed between MRI and histopathology for the largest diameter and thickness/infiltration depth of the primary lesions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Good concordance was observed between MRI and histopathological findings. Our initial findings indicate that non-erectile mpMRI is useful in preoperative assessment of primary penile SCC.
RESUMO
Background: After radical prostatectomy (RP), depending on stage, up to 40% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) will experience biochemical failure (BF). Despite salvage therapy, approximately one-third of these patients will need permanent hormone therapy (pHT) and are at risk of progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). Prognostic markers herald the need for neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or multimodal treatment. Objective: To evaluate the added value of blood LRG1 in predicting treatment failure in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP). Design setting and participants: We quantified LRG1 in serum or plasma sampled before radical prostatectomy from patients from the Martini-Klinik (Martini; n = 423), the Danish CuPCa cohort (CuPCa; n = 182), and Oslo University Hospital (OUH; n = 145). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The endpoints were BF, pHT, and CRPC. The association between LRG1 and survival outcomes was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional-hazards modeling. The added predictive value of LRG1 in nested models was estimated using the concordance index, time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis. Results and limitations: In multivariable Cox models using preoperative characteristics, LRG1 was associated with an estimated lower risk of BF in the Martini cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.90) and in the CuPCa cohort (aHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.73). Using preoperative prognostic variables, our data showed that doubling of LRG1 was also associated with a lower risk of pHT receipt in the CuPCa cohort (aHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.93) and of CRPC development in the OUH cohort (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.69). Similar aHR values were observed using either preoperative or postoperative variables for all endpoints. Conclusions: PCa patients with high blood LRG1 are at lower risk of BF, pHT receipt, and progression to CRPC. Since LRG1 adds value to established prognostic models, new prognostic factor combinations including LRG1 should be considered in future studies. Patient summary: We measured concentrations of the blood-based protein LRG1 before surgery for prostate cancer. Patients with high LRG1 levels had better disease-free survival, suggesting that LRG1 can help in predicting prognosis.
RESUMO
Importance: The perioperative period has gained attention as a window of opportunity to prevent cancer recurrence. Evidence in support of a role for nonselective ß-blockers (nsBBs) in cancer treatment is increasing, and counteracting cancer recurrence associated with perioperative stress and catecholamine is one of the suggested mechanisms of action. Objective: To explore whether use of nsBBs at the time of radical prostatectomy is associated with a lower rate of treatment for prostate cancer recurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from the Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Patient Registry, Norwegian Prescription Database, and Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Of 12 298 eligible patients, this study included 11 117 treatment-naive patients with prostate cancer (ie, no prior hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy) who underwent radical prostatectomy in Norway from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2015, with a minimum progression-free follow-up of 6 months. Data analysis was performed from April 20, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Exposures: Use of nsBBs and selective ß-blockers (sBBs) at time of radical prostatectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment for cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (defined as initiation of hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy) or, if no treatment was identified, cancer-specific mortality. Results: The study included 11 117 men with prostate cancer (median [IQR] age at radical prostatectomy, 64.8 [60.4-68.3] years). Of these, 1622 (14.6%) later received treatment for cancer recurrence during a median follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR, 2.4-6.3 years). Use of nsBBs at time of surgery among 209 patients was significantly associated with a lower risk of treatment for cancer recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96; P = .03). No such association was observed for use of sBBs (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-1.11; P = .62). Subanalyses with (1) relaxed inclusion criteria allowing for inclusion also of patients with early progression (within 6 months) and (2) only the healthiest patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0) supported the main findings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, use of nsBB but not sBBs at the time of radical prostatectomy was associated with less treatment initiation for cancer recurrence. This finding, together with accumulated preclinical and clinical evidence, provides a foundation for initiation of an interventional study.
