Percutaneous locking plates for fractures of the distal tibia: our experience and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Distal tibial metaphyseal fractures pose many complexities. This study assessed the outcomes of distal tibial fractures treated with medial locking plates. METHODS: Eighteen patients were selected based on the fracture pattern and classified using the AO classification and stabilized with an AO medial tibial locking plate. Time to fracture union, complications, and outcomes were assessed with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle score at 12 months. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 18 patients achieved fracture union, with 1 patient lost to follow-up. Twelve fractures united within 24 weeks, with an average union time of 23.1 weeks. Three delayed unions, two at 28 weeks and one at 56 weeks. The average time to union was 32 weeks in the smokers and 15.3 weeks in the nonsmokers. Five of the 18 patients (27%) developed complications. One superficial wound infection, and one chronic wound infection, resulting in nonunion at 56 weeks, requiring revision. Two patients required plate removal, one after sustaining an open fracture at the proximal end of the plate 6 months after surgery (postfracture union)and the other for painful hardware. One patient had implant failure of three proximal diaphyseal locking screws at the screwhead/neck junction, but successful fracture union. The average American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score was 88.8 overall, and 92.1 in fractures that united within 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Distal tibial locking plates have high fracture union rates, minimum soft tissue complications, and good functional outcomes. The literature shows similar fracture union and complication rates in locking and nonlocking plates.

Skip laminectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of clinical and radiologic outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective nonrandomized study comparing the outcomes of the 2 surgical techniques used in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. OBJECTIVE: We prospectively compared the skip laminectomy and laminoplasty in terms of extent of decompression achieved, axial pain, postoperative range of cervical motion, and patient and surgical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Laminoplasty is an established procedure for the decompression of multisegmental cervical compressive myelopathy. However, it often induces postoperative problems, such as axial pain, restriction of neck motion, and loss of lordotic alignment. Skip laminectomy was recently developed as a minimally invasive procedure. METHODS: We studied 50 consecutive patients operated on for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and spinal cord compression as demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between the levels C3-4 and C6-7. Each patient had a minimum follow-up of 2 years (2.2 to 4.3 y). Twenty-five patients underwent skip laminectomy and 25 patients underwent laminoplasty. Decompression was assessed by preoperative and postoperative MRI. Cervical range of motion was assessed by preoperative and postoperative flexion and extension radiographs. Patient outcomes were assessed by evaluation of preoperative and postoperative neurology and SF12 scores for mental health, physical health, and axial pain. RESULTS: Less blood loss and operative times with skip laminectomy. Similar degrees of decompression with both techniques. Significantly improved axial pain scores with skip laminectomy. Significantly improved preservation of range of movement with skip laminectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Skip laminectomy is an effective procedure for reducing the incidence of postoperative morbidities, such as persisting axial pain, and restriction of neck motion often seen after laminoplasty, and provides adequate decompression of the spinal cord as demonstrated on MRI for a minimum follow-up of 2 years.