Phase separated pretreatment strategies for enhanced waste activated sludge disintegration in anaerobic digestion: An outlook and recent trends.

A significant ecological problem was developed on disposing the enormous amounts of waste activated sludge (WAS) produced by traditional wastewater treatment. There have been various attempts recently originated to develop innovative methods for substantial sludge treatment. The most frequently used approach for treating sludge to produces methane and reduces sludge is anaerobic treatment. The hydrolysis phase in WAS limits the breakdown of complex macrobiotic compounds. The presence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biomass prevents the substrate from being hydrolyzed. Enhancing substrate hydrolysis involves removal of EPS preceded by phase separated pretreatment. Hence, a critical assessment of various phase separated pretreatment that has a remarkable effect on the anaerobic digestion process was documented in detail. Moreover, the economic viability and energy requirement of this treatment process was also discussed. Perspectives and recommendations for methane production were also provided to attain effectual sludge management.

Dispersion induced ozone pretreatment of waste activated biosolids: Arriving biomethanation modelling parameters, energetic and cost assessment.

In this study, the phase separated effect of dispersion induced ozone pretreatment (DOP) was investigated. Solid reduction, biomass lysis and biomethane production were used as essential parameters to assess the potential of DOP over ozone pretreatment (OP). A higher suspended solid reduction of about 25.2% was achieved in DOP than OP 18%. The ozone dosage of 0.014gO3/g SS supported a maximal biomass lysis of about 32.8% when the biosolids were subjected to prior dispersion at 30s and 3000rpm. However, the same ozone dosage without phase separation achieved 9.6% biomass lysis. The second exponential model results of the biomethane assay showed that DOP enhanced the accessibility of disintegrated biosolids for methane production and induced about 1150mL/g VS of methane production. The energy analysis reveals that DOP provides significant amount of positive net energy (152.65kWh/ton) when compared to OP (-12.42kWh/ton).

Affinity of estrogens for human progesterone receptor A and B monomers and risk of breast cancer: a comparative molecular modeling study.

BACKGROUND: The human progesterone receptor (hPR) belongs to the steroid receptor family. It may be found as monomers (A and B) and or as a dimer (AB). hPR is regarded as the prognostic biomarker for breast cancer. In a cellular dimer system, AB is the dominant species in most cases. However, when a cell coexpresses all three isoforms of hPR, the complexity of the action of this receptor increases. For example, hPR A suppresses the activity of hPR B, and the ratio of hPR A to hPR B may determine the physiology of a breast tumor. Also, persistent exposure of hPRs to nonendogenous ligands is a common risk factor for breast cancer. Hence we aimed to study progesterone and some nonendogenous ligand interactions with hPRs and their molecular docking. METHODS AND RESULTS: A pool of steroid derivatives, namely, progesterone, cholesterol, testosterone, testolectone, estradiol, estrone, norethindrone, exemestane, and norgestrel, was used for this in silico study. Dockings were performed on AutoDock 4.2. We found that estrogens, including estradiol and estrone, had a higher affinity for hPR A and B monomers in comparison with the dimer, hPR AB, and that of the endogenous progesterone ligand. hPR A had a higher affinity to all the docked ligands than hPR B. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the exposure of estrogens to hPR A as well as hPR B, and more particularly to hPR A alone, is a risk factor for breast cancer.