The effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns and defibrillation threshold during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns during ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) and defibrillation threshold (DFT). BACKGROUND: Acute and chronic amiodarone may act through different mechanisms. METHODS: The VERP, VF activation patterns and DFT were determined in 24 dogs. Twelve dogs received acute intravenous amiodarone (10 mg/kg, n = 6) or saline (n = 6), and 12 dogs received chronic oral amiodarone (20 mg/kg/day, n = 6) or placebo (n = 6). Epicardial VF activation patterns were recorded with 504 electrodes. Quantitative descriptors of VF were calculated. RESULTS: The DFT was unchanged by acute or chronic amiodarone. Although chronic amiodarone significantly extended the VERP, acute amiodarone did not. In the mapped region, acute and chronic amiodarone decreased the number of VF wavefronts by 42% and 60%. Acute amiodarone decreased conduction block by 22%, while chronic amiodarone increased block by 41% but decreased wave fractionation by 50%. Both chronic and acute amiodarone increased the size of the core of re-entrant circuits and decreased the incidence of re-entry by 44% and 57%; however, chronic amiodarone increased wavelength, while acute amiodarone did not. CONCLUSIONS: Neither acute nor chronic amiodarone change the DFT. While both acute and chronic amiodarone decrease the number of wavefronts, decrease the incidence of re-entry and increase the size of re-entrant cores in the mapped region during VF, they achieve these antiarrhythmic effects through different electrophysiologic mechanisms. Chronic amiodarone prolonged the VF cycle length and slowed conduction velocity, indicating it increased the wavelength and/or the excitable gap.

Ischemic preconditioning and Na+/H+ exchange inhibition improve reperfusion ion homeostasis.

BACKGROUND: Intramyocyte sodium (Na+) increases during ischemia and reperfusion, which causes myocardial calcium (Ca2+) uptake and leads to myocyte injury or death. This study determines if ischemic preconditioning and myocyte sodium-hydrogen ion (Na+-H+) exchange (NHE) inhibition decreases Na+ gain that otherwise occurs with cardioplegic arrest and reperfusion. METHODS: Pigs had 1 hour of cardioplegic arrest followed by reperfusion. Group 1 had no intervention (controls). Group 2 received dimethyl amiloride (DMA, an NHE inhibitor), and group 3 had ischemic preconditioning before cardioplegic arrest. Precardioplegia to postreperfusion change in intramyocyte ion content was measured with atomic absorption spectrometry. The time to initial electrical activity and number of defibrillations needed to establish an organized rhythm postreperfusion were used as electrophysiologic variables to measure ischemia-reperfusion injury. RESULTS: Intramyocyte Na+ content for group 1 increased from 45.9+/-6.7 to 61.9+/-22.5 micromol/g (p = 0.02). Group 2 had an insignificant decrease in intramyocyte Na+ of 27.7+/-19.58 micromol/g (p = 0.06), and group 3 had an insignificant decrease of 10.8+/-46.33 micromol/g (p = 0.48). Interstitial water increased significantly in all groups, but there were no significant increases in intramyocyte water content. Electrophysiologic recovery was similar for all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The NHE inhibition and ischemic preconditioning each eliminated the increase in intramyocyte Na+ content that otherwise occurred with cardioplegic arrest and reperfusion in this porcine model. Because their mechanisms are distinct, it is possible that an additive beneficial effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury can be achieved by using NHE inhibition together with a preconditioning stimulus as prereperfusion therapy.