RESUMO
This study sought to explore patterns of memory assessment in neuropsychological practice within New Zealand (NZ), to compare it to that previously described in Europe, North America and Australia, and to consider the implications for neuropsychology training in NZ. 80 NZ-registered psychologists completed an online survey asking them how frequently they utilized 50 commonly used tests of memory. Participants were also asked about their main areas of specialty, work context and demographic information. Whilst participants appeared, broadly, to utilize a similar set of 'core' tests to their colleagues in Europe, Australia and North America, there were a number of tests and test domains that were rarely utilized by NZ psychologists, in contrast to overseas samples. Furthermore, several of the tests in common usage have been shown to have significant validity issues for use with an NZ population. Overall, this study suggests that most NZ psychologists employ a similar approach to memory assessment, typically relying upon a small number of well-known tests. This appears to contrast with a greater variability of practice shown in studies of European, North American and Australian psychologists and raises several interesting questions for the future development of neuropsychology in NZ.
RESUMO
Loco-regional recurrence after radical primary treatment of oral cancer is associated with poor prognosis and major patient and career distress. The patient's psychosocial response to recurrence is underreported in the literature. This is one of the few papers to address in detail this stage in a patient's cancer journey. Qualitative methodology was used. Patients were recruited over a 13-month period. Analysis of recorded transcripts from 9 patients suggested that their illness experience and psychological response to diagnosis were multifaceted. Six key themes were identified, which were subdivided into 23 categories. Themes included emotional reactions, reevaluation, active coping strategies, life changes, support, and improvement in relationships. Emotional reactions ranged from shock and devastation, to fear and uncertainty, to hopelessness, to shame, to denial. Not all reactions were negative, and more positive experiences such as new found openness and improvement in relationships were expressed. There is heightened emotional vulnerability, and this leads to potentially difficult management issues among clinicians and members of the multidisciplinary team. Extreme sensitivity is required by all the individuals involved in providing healthcare at this acute time of patient and career distress.