Safety and efficacy of repeated balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) are poor, and this procedure needs to be repeated in selected cases. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of repeated BAV (reBAV). METHODS: We included consecutive patients who underwent reBAV in three Polish centers between 2010 and 2019. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic, procedural, and outcome data were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (median age 81.5 years, 57.1% women) who underwent reBAV were enrolled. In 42.9% of the patients, index BAV was considered a palliative treatment, and in 54.3% a bridge to definitive treatment. Index BAV decreased peak aortic valve gradient (pAVG) from a median of 78.0 mm Hg to 46.0 mm Hg (P <0.001). After a mean of 255.8 days, reBAV was performed. In most cases (71.4%), the reason for reBAV was the worsening of heart failure symptoms and in 54.3% of patients, reBAV was still considered a palliative option. A decrease in pAVG max from a median of 73.0 mm Hg to 45.0 mm Hg (P <0.001), comparable to index BAV, was observed. The frequency of complications were numerically higher for repeated procedures. During the median (IQR) follow-up of 403.0 (152.0-787.0) days from the index procedure, 80.0% of the patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Acute hemodynamic results of reBAV are comparable to those achieved during index BAV. However, reBAV may carry an increased risk of complications. Moreover, mortality is high due to unfavorable risk profiles or delays in receiving definitive therapy.

Pulmonary function, exercise capacity and dyspnea in patients 7 ​years after Nuss surgery.

PURPOSE: Pectus excavatum is a frequent thoracic malformation increasingly treated with minimally invasive methods (MIRPE), which are performed for cardio-respiratory problems and in some centers also for esthetic considerations. Theoretically, MIRPE may increase thoracic elastic recoil, work of breathing and cause emphysema. The aim of the present study was to determine whether teenagers who underwent MIRPE may expect normal thoracic cage development, cardio-respiratory function, exercise capacity and asymptomatic functioning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty five patients (21.1 â€‹± â€‹3.0 years) who underwent MIRPE between 2000 and 2010 were assessed 6.8 (±2.4) years after surgery. Controls were matched for sex, age and height to the intervention participants. Spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion capacity and the 6 â€‹min walking test (6MWT) were performed. Anteroposterior (AP) and transverse chest diameters were measured. RESULTS: Participants who underwent MIRPE had normal pulmonary function, and exercise capacity. After adjustment for potential confounders, the intervention group had lower mean BMI [-1.88 â€‹± â€‹0.56 (kg/m2); p â€‹= â€‹0.001] and chest AP diameter [-2.79 â€‹± â€‹0.57 (cm); p â€‹< â€‹0.001], but higher residual volume (RV%) [12.98 â€‹± â€‹5.31 (%); p â€‹= â€‹0.001], RV% total lung capacity (TLC) [5.56 â€‹± â€‹0.92 (%); p â€‹< â€‹0.001], forced expiratory volume in 1 â€‹s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) [2.64 â€‹± â€‹1.28 (%); p â€‹= â€‹0.039] and 6MWT distance [29.10 â€‹± â€‹13.02 (m); p â€‹= â€‹0.025]. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults who undergo MIRPE may expect normal pulmonary function and exercise capacity. Observed differences in air trapping require further assessment in terms of emphysema development risk.

Clinical Outcomes following Large Vessel Coronary Artery Perforation Treated with Covered Stent Implantation: Comparison between Polytetrafluoroethylene- and Polyurethane-Covered Stents (CRACK-II Registry).

Data on the clinical outcomes comparing synthetic fluorocarbon polymer polytetrafluoroethylene- (PTFE, GraftMaster) and polyurethane- (Papyrus) covered stents (CSs) to seal coronary artery perforations (CAPs) are limited. We aimed to evaluate 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI complicated by CAP and treated with CS. We assessed 106 consecutive patients with successful CAP sealing (122 CSs): GraftMaster (51 patients, 57 CSs) or Papyrus CS (55 patients, 65 CSs). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and myocardial infarction (MI). The mean age of subjects was 69 ± 9.6 years (53.8% males). No significant differences were identified between the GraftMaster and Papyrus groups at the 30-day follow-up for MACE, cardiac death, MI and stent thrombosis (ST), while significantly lower rate of TLR and TVR (p = 0.02) were confirmed in the Papyrus group. At one year, differences remained similar between stents for MACE, a trend towards a lower rate of TLR (p = 0.07), MI (p = 0.08), and ST (p = 0.08), and higher for cardiac death (p = 0.07) was observed in the Papyrus group. This real-life registry of CAP illustrated that the use of Papyrus CS is associated with lower rates of TLR and TVR at 30-day follow-up in comparison to the GraftMaster CSs and no significant differences between both assessed CS at one year of follow-up.

The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly questionnaire as a tool for the assessment of needs in elderly individuals living in long-term care institutions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly questionnaire (CANE) in assessing the needs of elderly individuals living in long-term care institutions (LTCI) in Poland. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The needs of 173 residents were assessed. The inclusion criteria were age (at least 75 years of age) and the lack of severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental Scale Examination score of at least 15 points). MEASUREMENTS: In all participants, met and unmet needs were assessed by themselves and by the nursing staff involved in care activities. RESULTS: The number of met needs assessed by the staff was higher than in the users' opinions (p<0.0001), whereas the number of unmet needs was lower (p<0.001). However, the average percentage of the agreement between the user and the staff was as high as 86.2%. The areas characterized by the lowest agreement were Company (65.3%), Memory (75.7%), Eyesight/hearing/communication (70.5%) and Psychological distress (70.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high percentage of agreement reached between the staff and user assessments of needs in our study, we were able to identify the areas of discrepancies between these two perceptions of needs. These can be treated as signals pointing to those aspects of care that should be addressed.