RESUMO
Macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion is the second most common cause of vascular vision impairment. The authors refer two case reports that describe different response to treatment with OZURDEX, biodegradable injectable implant slowly releasing 700 µg dexamethasone. Treatment with corticosteroids is effective also in the case of cystic retinal edema, but its effect can be temporary. The most common adverse events are elevation of intraocular pressure and cataract development.
Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/complicações , Acuidade Visual , Implantes de Medicamento , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pharmacoeconomic assessments are a part of the decision process not only during reimbursement setting, but in clinical practice as well. The presented cost-effectiveness analysis assesses panitumumab+mFOLFOX6 vs. bevacizumab+mFOLFOX6 in 1st line treatment of patients with wildtype RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the Czech environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The adaptation of a Markov model considers the healthcare perspective; clinical data (efficacy, healthcare utilization and adverse events) are derived from a head-to-head comparison (PEAK study). Health states included in the model: progression free on treatment, progression (with/âwithout active treatment), resection of metastases, disease-free after successful resection and death. Actual reimbursement levels were used to estimate costs, published literature to estimate duration of 2nd line treatment. The analysis assumes a lifetime horizon; uncertainty was limited by performing one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Analysis outcomes are life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: Panitumumab+mFOLFOX6 is more effective and more costly in 1st line patients with wildtype RAS mCRC. Incremental costs per QALY are 837,270 CZK, per LYG 615,022 CZK; however, below the willingness-to-pay threshold applied in the Czech Republic. CONCLUSIONS: Panitumumab+mFOLFOX6 is cost-effective in 1st line treatment of patients with wildtype RAS mCRC compared to bevacizumab+mFOLFOX6 in the Czech setting.