Development and validation of a simple general population lung cancer risk model including AHRR-methylation.

INTRODUCTION: Screening reduces lung cancer mortality of high-risk populations. Currently proposed screening eligibility criteria only identify half of those individuals, who later develop lung cancer. This study aimed to develop and validate a sensitive and simple model for predicting 10-year lung cancer risk. METHODS: Using the 1991-94 examination of The Copenhagen City Heart Study in Denmark, 6,820 former or current smokers from the general population were followed for lung cancer within 10 years after examination. Logistic regression of baseline variables (age, sex, education, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, family history of lung cancer, smoking status and cumulative smoking, secondhand smoking, occupational exposures to dust and fume, body mass index, lung function, plasma C-reactive protein, and AHRR(cg05575921) methylation) identified the best predictive model. The model was validated among 3,740 former or current smokers from the 2001-03 examination, also followed for 10 years. A simple risk chart was developed with Poisson regression. RESULTS: Age, sex, education, smoking status, cumulative smoking, and AHRR(cg05575921) methylation identified 65 of 88 individuals who developed lung cancer in the validation cohort. The highest risk group, consisting of less educated men aged >65 with current smoking status and cumulative smoking >20 pack-years, had absolute 10-year risks varying from 4% to 16% by AHRR(cg05575921) methylation. CONCLUSION: A simple risk chart including age, sex, education, smoking status, cumulative smoking, and AHRR(cg05575921) methylation, identifies individuals with 10-year lung cancer risk from below 1% to 16%. Including AHRR(cg05575921) methylation in the eligibility criteria for screening identifies smokers who would benefit the most from screening.

Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Renal Diseases: A Review of Animal and Human Studies.

Background: Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) has been suggested as a treatment for vascular diseases such as ischemic heart disease, diabetic foot ulcers, and erectile dysfunction. Primarily, LI-ESWT is known for its ability to stimulate angiogenesis and activation of stem cells in target tissues. Application of LI-ESWT in chronic progressive renal diseases is a novel area. The aim of the present review was to summarize available data on the effects of LI-ESWT used in the setting of renal diseases. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases for relevant studies. Our review included the results from preclinical animal experiments and clinical research. Results: Eleven animal studies and one clinical study were included in the review. In the animal studies, LI-ESWT was used for the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy (n=1), diabetic nephropathy (n=1), or various types of ischemic renal injury (ie, artery occlusion, reperfusion injury) (n=9). The clinical study was conducted in a single-arm cohort as a Phase 1 study with patients having diabetic nephropathy. In animal studies, the application of LI-ESWT was associated with several effects: LI-ESWT led to increased VEGF and endothelial cell proliferation and improved vascularity and perfusion of the kidney tissue. LI-ESWT reduced renal inflammation and fibrosis. LI-ESWT caused only mild side effects in the clinical study, and, similarly, there were no signs of kidney injury after LI-ESWT in the animal studies. Conclusion: LI-ESWT, as a non-invasive treatment, reduces the pathological manifestations (inflammation, capillary rarefaction, fibrosis, decreased perfusion) associated with certain types of renal disease. The efficacy of renal LI-ESWT needs to be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.

Changing Smoking Behavior and Epigenetics: A Longitudinal Study of 4,432 Individuals From the General Population.

BACKGROUND: Hypomethylation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR) gene indicates long-term smoking exposure and might therefore be a monitor for smoking-induced disease risk. However, studies of individual longitudinal changes in AHRR methylation are sparse. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the recovery of AHRR methylation depend on change in smoking behaviors and demographic variables? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included 4,432 individuals from the Copenhagen City Heart Study, with baseline and follow-up blood samples and smoking information collected approximately 10 years apart. AHRR methylation at the cg05575921 site was measured in bisulfite-treated leukocyte DNA. Four smoking groups were defined: participants who never smoked (Never-Never), participants who formerly smoked (Former-Former), participants who quit during the study period (Current-Former), and individuals who smoked at both baseline and follow-up (Current-Current). Methylation recovery was defined as the increase in AHRR methylation between baseline and follow-up examination. RESULTS: Methylation recovery was highest among participants who quit, with a median methylation recovery of 5.58% (interquartile range, 1.79; 9.15) vs 1.64% (interquartile range, -1.88; 4.96) in the Current-Current group (P < .0001). In individuals who quit smoking, older age was associated with lower methylation recovery (P < .0001). In participants who quit aged > 65 years, methylation recovery was 5.9% at 5.6 years after quitting; methylation recovery was 8.5% after 2.8 years for participants who quit aged < 55 years. INTERPRETATION: AHRR methylation recovered after individuals quit smoking, and recovery was more pronounced and occurred faster in younger compared with older interim quitters.

Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Results from an Open-Label Interventional Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) is associated with angiogenesis and is suggested as a treatment for different types of vascular diseases. It was hypothesized that LI-ESWT improves the renal filtration barrier and halts the progression of GFR decline in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) potentially through VEGF and NO formation. We present the first data on LI-ESWT in human DKD. METHODS: The study was designed as an interventional, prospective, one-arm, Phase 1 study. We investigated change in GFR and albuminuria in 28 patients with DKD treated with six sessions of LI-ESWT over three weeks. The patients were followed for six months. Urine excretion of kidney injury markers, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and nitric oxide metabolites (NOx) was studied after LI-ESWT. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in GFR and albuminuria up to six months after LI-ESWT compared to baseline. Urine VEGF was transiently reduced one month after LI-ESWT, but there were no other significant changes in urine VEGF or NOx after LI-ESWT. Secondary analysis showed that NOx increased after LI-ESWT in patients who had low levels of NOx at baseline. Kidney injury marker trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) increased acutely after the first session of LI-ESWT indicating transient endothelial repair. Other markers of kidney injury were stable in relation to LI-ESWT. CONCLUSION: LI-ESWT treatment did not significantly improve kidney function and albumin excretion. It is concluded that LI-ESWT is not harmful. A randomized blinded study should be performed to clarify whether adjunctive treatment with LI-ESWT is superior to standard treatment of DKD.

Low-intensity shockwave therapy in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy: a prospective Phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LI-SWT) is suggested as a therapy for promoting tissue regeneration. In pigs, it was recently found that LI-SWT improved renal function after ischaemic injury. Our objectives were to study glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy (DN) after treatment with LI-SWT. The present pilot study reports on the clinical safety of LI-SWT in DN. METHODS: A total of 14 patients with diabetes mellitus and Stage 3 chronic kidney disease were recruited for this prospective, one-arm Phase 1 study. The patients were treated with six sessions of LI-SWT during a 3-week period. At each session, 3000 shockwaves were applied to each kidney with 0.265 mJ/mm2, extended focal size and 4 Hz. Follow-up visits were performed at 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: In general, the treatment was well tolerated. Transient macroscopic haematuria was observed in three patients immediately after LI-SWT. The majority of patients experienced lower back tenderness lasting up to 2 days after treatment. There was no need for analgesic treatment. LI-SWT showed no negative effect on GFR and albuminuria. At baseline, median (interquartile range) GFR was 33.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (27.8-43.8) compared with 36.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (27.5-52.0) at 6 months follow-up. In parallel, median albuminuria was 256 mg/24 h (79-619) at baseline and tended to decrease to 137 mg/24 h (41-404) 6 months after LI-SWT. There was no statistical difference between baseline and follow-up results. CONCLUSIONS: LI-SWT is a safe treatment for DN. Inclusion of more patients is needed to determine whether LI-SWT can improve renal functional outcomes.