Surveillance After Ureteroneocystostomy: Is it Necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of post-operative imaging after ureteroneocystostomy and whether long-term symptom or radiographic surveillance aided in the detection of recurrent obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients were identified who underwent a ureteroneocystostomy with or without psoas hitch or Boari flap between January 2012 and June 2021. Patients who underwent a bilateral procedure, had active malignancy or immediate failure, or did not have 6 months of follow-up with 2 imaging studies were excluded. Using the initial imaging study after stent removal, patients were categorized into normal and equivocal groups according to predefined radiologic criteria. Patients were followed longitudinally to determine whether they subsequently developed radiographic evidence of obstruction. Follow up visits were reviewed for patient symptoms suggestive of post-operative obstruction, defined as flank pain, hematuria, or pyelonephritis. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients met criteria. Normal and equivocal initial imaging was seen in 99 and 13 patients, respectively. At a mean radiologic follow-up of 32 months, stricture recurrence was identified in 3 patients with normal initial imaging. No patients with initial equivocal imaging demonstrated recurrent obstruction at mean radiologic follow-up of 29 months. All patients with recurrent stricture presented with symptoms of obstruction. Of patients who developed symptoms after ureteroneocystostomy, 13.6% had recurrent stricture. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic patients after ureteroneocystostomy who had either normal or equivocal post-operative imaging did not benefit from additional radiologic testing in this cohort. All patients that demonstrated failure presented with symptomatic obstruction that warranted imaging. Surgeons may consider restricting surveillance imaging to symptomatic patients after the initial post-operative period.

Robotic Versus Open Ureteroneocystostomy: Is There a Robotic Benefit?

Aim: We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent an open vs robotic ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral obstruction. Methods: Retrospective review was performed on adult patients who underwent primary ureteroneocystostomy for obstruction from January 2012 to April 2018. Intraoperative outcomes of estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time, as well as postoperative outcomes of catheter and stent duration, length of hospital stay, inpatient nurse-controlled opioid use, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and outpatient opioid prescription, complications, readmission, radiologic and clinical stricture recurrence, and follow-up, were compared. Among the open cohort, indications for an open approach were evaluated, identifying patients with prior complex open abdominal surgery that would make an open approach preferable. Results: Open ureteroneocystostomy was performed in 27 patients compared with 18 who underwent a robotic approach. The open and robotic cohorts were not significantly different in age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, stricture location or side, abdominal surgery (laparoscopic or open), pelvic radiation, or preoperative urinary tract infection. The robotic group had a significantly lower rate of prior open abdominal surgery. The robotic cohort had significantly lower EBL, length of stay (LOS), catheter duration, prescribed morphine milliequivalents (MME) at discharge, and rate of PCA usage. Among the open cohort, 13 (48%) patients demonstrated indications making an open approach preferable. Comparing the robotic group with the remaining 14 open patients revealed a significantly lower rate of inpatient PCA use, prescribed MME at discharge, LOS, and catheter duration. Mean operative time was higher in the robotic group. EBL was not significantly different in this subanalysis. Conclusions: Robotic ureteroneocystostomy provides similar outcomes when compared with an open approach in well-selected patients when assessing for recurrent ureteral obstruction or adverse events. Robotic surgery is associated with lower postoperative narcotic pain prescriptions at discharge, lower PCA usage, and shorter LOS, which are important benefits when compared with open surgery.

Does Early Ureteroneocystostomy After Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury Jeopardize Outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent early repair (≤7 days) of iatrogenic ureteral injury with ureteroneocystostomy and compare them to those repaired in a delayed fashion (>7 days). METHODS: A retrospective review of billing data between 2012 and 2018 identified patients who underwent ureteroneocystostomy for a benign ureteral disease. Inclusion criteria included all ureteral injuries related to a laparoscopic, robotic, or open surgical injury. Patients with ureteral injury related to radiation, stones, or reconstructive surgery were excluded. Patients undergoing reconstruction during the initial injury or within ≤7 days were designated as having undergone early repair, while the remaining were considered delayed repair. Demographics, as well as inpatient and postdischarge data were acquired, and statistical analysis was performed comparing the 2 groups. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Early repair was performed on 12 patients, while 55 underwent delayed repair. No significant difference in age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Score, laterality, stricture location, or history of pelvic/abdominal radiation was noted. Inpatient complications were significantly higher in the immediate group (58 vs 18%, P =.004). Thirty- and 90-day complications were similar. Two patients in the delayed group and none in the immediate group demonstrated stricture recurrence (P =.710). A higher rate of Boari flap ureteral reconstruction was performed in the delayed cohort (P =.001). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, there was no detectable difference in outcomes when comparing early and delayed ureteroneocystostomy for iatrogenic ureteral injuries.