Sesamoid malalignment in hallux valgus: Radiographic and MRI measurements and their correlation with internal derangement findings of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

OBJECTIVE: Sesamoid displacement (SD) and rotation are important components in the preoperative assessment of hallux valgus (HV). To date, Inter reader reliability (IRR) of SD on X-rays and MRI, correlations with hallux valgus angle (HVA), and qualitative changes of the hallux-sesamoid complex (HSC) on MRI have not been studied. The aim of this study was to correlate sesamoid malalignment with HV severity and findings of internal joint derangement. METHODS: Two readers analyzed a series of 56 consecutive patients who had X-rays and MRI performed on the same foot within 3 months of each other. Multiple measures of SD on X-rays and MRI and the sesamoid rotation angle (SRA) on MRI were assessed and correlated with HVA and various qualitative features at the HSC including cartilage, plantar plate, and collateral ligament abnormalities. RESULTS: We found excellent IRR (ICC = 0.79 - 0.99) for SRA on MR, but poor IRR for lateral sesamoid displacement (LDS) and tibial sesamoid position (TSP) scales on both modalities. Good IRR was also seen for morphologic abnormalities of HSC. The absolute value of the SRA on MR positively correlated with HVA ( p < 0.0001). LDS and TSP on both modalities lacked a significant correlation with HVA ( p > 0.05). No correlation was found between any measure of SD or rotation with HSC morphologic changes ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among different measures of sesamoid malalignment, sesamoid rotation angle measured on MRI can be used to judge the severity of HV; however, it does not correlate with qualitative morphologic abnormalities of the HSC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The MRI measurement of SRA is a better indicator of sesamoid displacement relative to the HSC than standard AP radiographic measures of non-rotational sesamoid displacement; however, it should not be used to predict qualitative morphologic abnormalities of the HSC.

Hallux valgus assessment on X-ray and Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI): Correlation with qualitative soft tissue and internal derangement findings on MRI.

AIM: Radiographs (X-rays) are used for the preoperative assessment of hallux valgus (HV). Our purpose was to determine how well quantitative measurements of HV on radiographs and MRI correlate with the qualitative soft tissue and internal derangement findings on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After IRB approval, 56 consecutive patients with MRI and radiographs of the foot were retrospectively reviewed. Two trained readers independently evaluated radiographs, measuring hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA). Two separate readers assessed qualitative MRI data by evaluating 21 different soft tissue and bony features. Statistical analysis included inter-reader reliability (IRR) and correlation of quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS: Excellent IRR (ICC = 0.89-0.96) was observed for radiograph and MRI measurements of the hallux valgus severity. For qualitative assessments on MRI, IRR was good to excellent for all features (ICC = 0.63-0.9). No significant difference was found for HVA or IMA between normal and abnormal qualitative MRI features. No statistically significant correlation between the severity of hallux valgus and injury to hallux joints and supporting structures was found. CONCLUSION: Hallux valgus measurements are reliable on x-rays and MRI and qualitative findings of 1st MTP joint show good to excellent inter-reader agreement on MRI. No statistically significant correlations exist between the severity of hallux valgus and qualitative MRI findings.

Hallux Valgus Evaluation on MRI: Can Measurements Validated on Radiographs Be Used?

Hallux valgus (HV) is a common deformity of the great toe affecting >23% of adults in the United States. The severity of the deformity is traditionally analyzed using radiographs to determine measurements such as the HV and intermetatarsal angles. We sought to determine the relationship between the radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements because this is not yet known. Two of us analyzed a series of 56 consecutive patients who had had radiographs and MRI performed on the same foot between April 27, 2015 and March 9, 2016 and who satisfied all other inclusion and exclusion criteria (age 18 to 100 years, no history of recent foot trauma, and no metal hardware in the foot). We found excellent interreader reliability (intraclass correlation 0.89 to 0.96) and intermodality agreement (intraclass correlation 0.83 to 0.91). The HV angle measured 15.0° ± 8.8° on the MRI scans and 13.8° ± 8.7° on the radiographs (mean difference -1.15° ± 3.89°), and the intermetatarsal angle was 9.0° ± 3.1° on the MRI scans and 8.8° ± 2.9° on the radiographs (mean difference -0.22° ± 2.10°). The HV measurements were reliable on both radiographs and MRI for the range of values tested. Small intermodality statistically significant differences in HV angle measurements were found; however, these might not be enough to be clinically significant.

What we know about management of traumatic abdominal wall hernia: review of the literature and case report.

Traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) is an uncommon form of hernia caused by blunt traumatic disruption of the abdominal wall musculature/fascia and abdominal organ herniation. Diagnosis of TAWH is challenging and requires a high level of suspicion. This form of hernia seems to be underrepresented in the English-language medical literature. There is currently no consensus on the optimal management for TAWH. In this article, we discuss the management of a 36-year-old motorcycle driver who was involved in a road traffic accident. On evaluation at our trauma center, he was found to have TAWH. Diagnostic criteria, imaging modalities and different management options for TAWH will be discussed.

Abdominal wall hernia and aortic injury secondary to blunt trauma: Case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) and traumatic abdominal aortic injury (TAAI) are two uncommon complications secondary to blunt trauma. In both TAWH and TAAI, reported cases are often associated with poly-trauma. TAWH may be initially missed if more pressing issues are identified during the patient's primary survey. TAAI may be an incidental finding on imaging or, if severe, a cause of an acute abdomen and hemodynamic abnormality. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 54-year-old white male suffered a TAWH and TAAI (pseudoaneurysm) due to severe blunt trauma. TAWH was apparent on physical exam and the TAAI was suspected on computed tomography (CT). The patient's TAWH was managed with a series of abdominal explorations and the TAAI was repaired with endovascular stenting. DISCUSSION: TAWH and TAAI are commonly due to severe blunt trauma from motor vehicle collisions. Diagnosis is made through physical exam, imaging studies, or surgical exploration. A variety of surgical techniques achieve technical success. CONCLUSION: The patient with blunt trauma to the abdomen is at risk for TAWH and TAAI, which are often associated with other injuries. Investigations should include thorough clinical exam through secondary survey and radiologic imaging in the hemodynamically normal patient.

Understanding the cause of an unreadable nuclear medicine image: a case of unexpected results with 123I whole-body scintigraphy.

When unexpected results are obtained with standard image collection, the nuclear medicine physician must consider many technical factors that may have contributed. When image quality is poor, prior radiotracer administration, among other things, should always be considered. Our case demonstrates how knowledge of patient history and basic principles of nuclear medicine physics allows recognition of the septal penetration artifact. This allows the nuclear medicine physician to tailor the exam to an individual patient and obtain the most useful diagnostic information for the clinician.