Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epilepsia ; 64(2): 364-373, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36413125

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of oral diazepam are affected by food, but food-effect studies have not been conducted for diazepam nasal spray because it is believed that most absorption occurs via the nasal mucosa. However, gastrointestinal side effects reported with nasal diazepam suggest that at least a portion of the drug may be absorbed enterally and thus subject to food effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possible effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of diazepam nasal spray in healthy adults. METHODS: This randomized, open-label crossover study compared equal doses of diazepam nasal spray after an overnight fast and after a standardized high-fat, high-calorie breakfast. Each participant served as their own control, and there was a washout period of at least 21 days between treatments. RESULTS: Twenty-four healthy adults enrolled in this study. Two participants withdrew consent, and two had pre-dose diazepam concentrations that exceeded the protocol-defined minimum after the washout period and were excluded from the final analysis population of 20 participants. Under fed conditions, the mean maximum plasma diazepam concentration was decreased by 48% (p < .0001) and the overall diazepam exposure during the first 4 h was reduced by 57% (p < .0001) compared with fasted conditions. The time to maximum plasma concentration was 4.0 h in the fed state compared with 2.0 h in the fasted state (p < .0001). At 2 h post-dose, diazepam concentrations were ≥150 ng/mL for 100% of the participants when in the fasted state and 30% when in the fed state. Significantly more participants experienced adverse events under fasted conditions (83.3%) than under fed conditions (54.5%; p = .0340). SIGNIFICANCE: This study in healthy volunteers demonstrated that food significantly decreases and delays the absorption of diazepam dosed via nasal spray. Patients using diazepam nasal spray after eating may obtain diazepam concentrations that are below those needed for seizure control.


Assuntos
Diazepam , Sprays Nasais , Humanos , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Disponibilidade Biológica , Convulsões , Área Sob a Curva , Administração Oral
2.
Epilepsia ; 61(11): 2426-2434, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32944970

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Diazepam buccal film (DBF) is in development for treatment of patients experiencing bouts of increased seizure activity. We assessed safety, tolerability, and usability of self- or caregiver-administered DBF in the outpatient setting. METHODS: Patients aged 2-65 years needing treatment with a rescue benzodiazepine at least once monthly were eligible for the study. DBF (5-17.5 mg) was dispensed based on age and body weight. Patients/caregivers administered DBF for up to five seizure episodes per month. Adverse events (AEs) and usability assessments were recorded after the first dose, then every 3 months. RESULTS: Onehundred eighteen patients who used ≥1 DBF dose (adults, n = 82; adolescents, n = 19; children, n = 17) were enrolled. Eleven treatment-related AEs (10 being mild or moderate in severity) occurred in nine (7.6%) patients over a mean of 243 days of follow-up. No patient discontinued participation because of AEs. Mild local buccal discomfort, buccal swelling, and cheek skin sensitivity were reported by one patient each. Twenty-two serious AEs were reported; one was treatment-related. The three deaths reported, all unrelated to DBF, resulted from seizures or seizure with brain malignancy. Self-administration by adults was attempted on 23.6% (188/795) of use occasions. Administration of DBF occurred under ictal or peri-ictal conditions on 49.5% (538/1087) of use occasions, and DBF was successfully administered on a first or second attempt on 96.6% (1050/1087) of use occasions. Overall, patients received their dose of DBF on 99.2% (1078/1087) of use occasions. A second DBF dose was required within 24 hours after the first dose on 8.5% (92/1087) of use occasions. SIGNIFICANCE: In this observational study of chronic intermittent use, DBF was easy to administer, safe, and well tolerated in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with epilepsy experiencing seizure emergencies. DBF can be readily self-administered by adults with epilepsy, as well as successfully administered by a caregiver in seizure emergencies.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Diazepam/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/métodos , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Bucal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/metabolismo , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diazepam/efeitos adversos , Diazepam/metabolismo , Esquema de Medicação , Epilepsia/metabolismo , Feminino , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...