Implementation and Evaluation of a Residency Preparation Program for Fourth-Year Doctor of Pharmacy Students.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of a formal residency preparation program on student match rates, and to evaluate student-reported advisement activities and perceptions of the residency application process. METHODS: An optional, noncredit-bearing, residency preparation program was implemented in professional year 4 (PY4) of the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. The program consisted of 4 residency preparation presentations and/or workshops: curriculum vitae writing, navigating the residency application process and American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacy Midyear Clinical Meeting, letter of intent writing, and interview skills. Students attended either virtually or in person, with 3 of the 4 sessions including small group breakout sessions. The program also included dedicated, 1-on-1 residency advisement with residency-experienced advisors. RESULTS: Residency match rates following program implementation increased from 74.3% (comparison group) to 87.5% (intervention group). More students in the intervention group reported that their advisor assisted them with curriculum vitae review, letter of intent review, and interview skills. In addition, the intervention group reported significantly more time spent meeting with their advisor during PY4 than the comparison group. Students found the program to be beneficial to their professional development, indicated that it helped them to obtain a residency position, and expressed that they would participate in the residency preparation program again. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a formal residency preparation program for PY4 students that included 1-on-1 dedicated residency advisement increased match rates and interaction between students and their residency advisor.

Clinical and economic effectiveness of a pharmacy and primary care collaborative transition of care program.

BACKGROUND: Primary care pharmacists are uniquely positioned to improve care quality by intervening within care transitions in the postdischarge period. However, additional evidence is required to demonstrate that pharmacist-led interventions can reduce health care utilization in a cost-effective manner. The study's objective was to evaluate the clinical and economic effectiveness of a pharmacy-led transition of care (TOC) program within a primary care setting. METHODS: This cluster randomized trial was conducted between 2019 and 2021 and included three primary care practices. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and at high risk of readmission. The multifaceted pharmacy intervention included medication reconciliation, comprehensive medication review, and patient and provider follow-up. The primary composite endpoint included hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days of discharge. Differences in outcomes were modeled using a generalized estimated equations approach and outcomes were assumed to be distributed as a Poisson random variable. A cost-benefit analysis was embedded within the study and estimated economic outcomes from a provider group/health system perspective. Cost measures included: net benefit, benefit to cost ratio (BCR), and return on investment (ROI). RESULTS: Of 300 eligible patients, 36 were in the intervention group and 264 in the control group. The intervention significantly reduced the primary composite outcome of all-cause readmissions and ED visits within 30 days (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.66; P < 0.001). There were significant reductions in both 30-day all-cause readmissions (aIRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67; P < 0.001) and ED visits (aIRR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20, 0.31; P < 0.001) between groups. The net benefit of the intervention was $9,078, with a BCR of 2.11 and a ROI of 111%. Sensitivity analyses were robust to changes in economic inputs. CONCLUSION: This care transition program had positive clinical and economic benefits, providing further support for the essential role pharmacists demonstrate in providing TOC services.

Transitions of care education in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacist-led transitions of care (TOC) services have demonstrated a positive impact on patient care and professional pharmacy organizations recommend integration of TOC-related education into doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curricula. The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which TOC is taught in United States (US) colleges and schools of pharmacy and to characterize the educational content and the instructional methods used. METHODS: An 18-question electronic survey about TOC education was sent to US school of pharmacy faculty. One survey response per school was requested. Schools with an accredited or candidate-status PharmD program were included and duplicate responses from schools were adjudicated and combined. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 54.6% (n = 77). Of the responding schools, 92.2% reported incorporating TOC content into their required didactic curriculum and 43.1% reported incorporating TOC content in their elective didactic curriculum. Of the 11 TOC-related topics included in the survey, 3 were covered universally in the required or elective didactic curricula of responding schools. Both lecture and active-learning pedagogies were used to teach TOC. Introductory pharmacy practice experiences and advanced pharmacy practice experiences that incorporate TOC were offered at 85.3% and 98.5% of schools, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most schools of pharmacy who responded to this survey included TOC-related content in their curricula. Research into best practices for educating students on this topic is needed to help ensure graduates are prepared to contribute to this area of practice.

Implementation and Assessment of a Heart Failure Virtual Patient Simulation in a Required Pharmacotherapy Course.

Objective. To assess second year Doctor of Pharmacy students' academic performance in and perceptions of a heart failure (HF) virtual patient simulation used in a required pharmacotherapy course.Methods. A heart failure virtual patient simulation was created to augment heart failure pharmacotherapy course material at the University at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences in the fall of 2019. This was a retrospective, pre-post observational cohort study. The primary objective was to compare student performance on heart failure pharmacotherapy examination questions in a cohort of students who completed a virtual patient simulation in 2019 compared to a control cohort who completed a paper-based case activity in 2018. Student perceptions of the simulation experience were assessed via electronic survey.Results. Students completed either the virtual patient simulation (n=122) or a paper-based case activity (n=123). Overall, the proportion of correctly answered heart failure pharmacotherapy examination questions was 83.3% in the virtual simulation group compared to 79.2% in the paper-based case group. Survey results indicated that students would prefer that the virtual patient simulation be incorporated in the pharmacotherapy curriculum.Conclusion. Use of a heart failure virtual patient simulation was associated with improved examination performance and was well received by students.

Accessibility of postgraduate training program information to graduates from US doctor of pharmacy programs holding F-1 visas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate information provided by residency and fellowship programs to graduates of Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education-accredited doctor of pharmacy programs holding F-1 visas who are seeking postgraduate training opportunities. METHODS: A 2-phase review of all US-based postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residency and fellowship programs was conducted. In phase 1, program eligibility criteria were reviewed from the residency and fellowship directories published by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP). In phase 2, the postgraduate programs' official websites were reviewed for additional information. Each program was evaluated to determine the eligibility of international students with F-1 visa or Optional Practical Training (OPT) status, visa sponsorship and work authorization opportunities, and citizenship requirements. Programs were classified as eligible or noneligible to international students or as not providing sufficient information. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: A total of 1,455 ASHP PGY1 programs and 69 fellowship programs were included in our analysis. In phase 1, there were 3 eligible programs accepting applicants with F-1/OPT status and 377 noneligible programs. In phase 2, there were 10 eligible programs accepting applicants with F-1/OPT status or providing H-1B sponsorship and 410 noneligible programs. Over 70% of programs (phase 1, n = 1,075; phase 2, n = 1,035) were classified as providing no information. None of the fellowship programs were classified as eligible in our review. CONCLUSION: Most residency and fellowship programs did not provide clear eligibility criteria for students with F-1/OPT status. Only a few programs clearly stated that they would accept applicants with F-1/OPT status or provide visa sponsorship to graduates holding F-1 visas.

Assessment of a Scholars Program Designed to Enhance Pharmacy Students' Competitiveness for Postgraduate Residency Training.

Objective. To assess pharmacy residency match/placement rates and student perceptions of a program designed to enhance Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) student competitiveness for postgraduate residency positions. Methods. The Scholars Program was developed to provide advanced training to select PharmD students who had an interest in postgraduate residency training and was completed during the third and fourth professional years. The program consisted of mentoring; elective coursework encompassing clinical practice, teaching, and leadership; modified experiential education; journal club meetings; teaching assistant duties; conducting research and/or scholarship; and delivering professional presentations. Residency match/placement rates of students who had completed the program were compared to national data and to students in the school who were not enrolled in the program. Perceptions of the program were assessed using an online survey. Results. Sixty-four students enrolled in and completed the Scholars Program from 2013 to 2019. Of these, 58 (91%) pursued postgraduate residency training. Students enrolled in the program had a higher combined phase 1/phase 2 match rate (91.4% vs 67.4%) than students in other PharmD programs across the United States. Similarly, students enrolled in the Scholars Program had a higher combined phase 1/phase 2 match rate (91.4% vs 62.9%) and overall residency placement rate (96.6% vs 67.0%) compared to students in the school who were not enrolled in the program. More than 85% of students enrolled in the Scholars Program who pursued residency training agreed that the program prepared them for and helped them attain a postgraduate residency. Conclusion. Pharmacy students enrolled in the Scholars Program experienced high residency match/placement rates and viewed the program as valuable preparation for postgraduate training.

Implementation of a Pharmacist-Led Transitions of Care Program within a Primary Care Practice: A Two-Phase Pilot Study.

Pharmacists in primary care settings have unique opportunities to address the causes of ineffective care transitions. The objective of this study is to describe the implementation of a multifaceted pharmacist transitions of care (TOC) intervention integrated into a primary care practice and evaluate the effectiveness of the program. This was a two-phase pilot study describing the development, testing, and evaluation of the TOC program. In Phase 1, the TOC intervention was implemented in a general patient population, while Phase 2 focused the intervention on high-risk patients. The two pilot phases were compared to each other (Phase 1 vs. Phase 2) and to a historical control group of patients who received usual care prior to the intervention (Phase 1 and Phase 2 vs. control). The study included 138 patients in the intervention group (Phase 1: 101 and Phase 2: 37) and 118 controls. At baseline, controls had a significantly lower LACE index, shorter length of stay, and a lower number of medications at discharge, indicating less medical complexity. A total of 344 recommendations were provided over both phases, approximately 80% of which were accepted. In adjusted models, there were no significant differences in 30-day all-cause readmissions between Phase 2 and controls (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.21-2.89; p = 0.71) or Phase 1 (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.30-3.37; p = 0.99). This study successfully implemented a pharmacist-led TOC intervention within a primary care setting using a two-phase pilot design. More robust studies are needed in order to identify TOC interventions that reduce healthcare utilization in a cost-effective manner.

Pharmacist-led transitions-of-care services in primary care settings: Opportunities, experiences, and challenges.

OBJECTIVE: To initiate a call to action for ambulatory care pharmacists to play a more active role in transitional care management within primary care settings by discussing relevant opportunities, experiences, and challenges. SUMMARY: With the shift to value-based health care, greater emphasis is being placed on improving patient care quality at the lowest cost. This represents an opportunity for pharmacist integration into primary care teams to address medication management challenges in the postdischarge period. Primary care pharmacists are uniquely positioned to close gaps in care not typically addressed by hospital-based programs. These pharmacists can provide complex transition interventions tailored toward individual patients, including comprehensive medication review, patient counseling, and direct collaboration with providers. For broad acceptance of these services, current challenges include identifying and prioritizing high-risk patients, establishing the cost-effectiveness of these strategies, and ultimately applying dissemination and implementation methodologies to increase the potential impact of these interventions. CONCLUSION: Opportunities are expanding for primary care pharmacists to play a more substantial role in transitional care management in sustainable ways. For widespread implementation of these strategies, additional research is necessary to determine their clinical effectiveness as well as cost-effectiveness and to understand better the barriers and facilitators to adopting these interventions.

Impact of a community pharmacy transitions-of-care program on 30-day readmission.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a transitions-of-care (TOC) program on both all-cause and related 30-day hospital readmission. The secondary objective was to evaluate which patient-specific factors, if any, are predictive of 30-day hospital readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A TOC program in an outpatient pharmacy, driven primarily by student pharmacists, provided telephone-based counseling to recently discharged patients. The calls were conducted within 2 to 7 days after discharge and focused on medication counseling and reconciliation, as well as promotion of a physician follow-up visit. The goal of this program was to decrease hospital readmissions among patients discharged with a cardiovascular-related diagnosis. Patient-specific information was recorded in a spreadsheet, including discharge diagnosis, and readmission diagnosis for those who returned to an inpatient facility within 30 days. This study was a retrospective chart review. Data were manually extracted from the program's data spreadsheet and the institution's electronic medical record for patients referred to the TOC program from June through November 2017. Patients discharged to hospice, prison, or a long-term care facility were excluded from analysis. Researchers collected information on patient demographics, diagnoses, and readmissions. Data analyses were performed with the use of SAS 9.4. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was 30-day all-cause readmission, and the secondary measure was 30-day related readmission. RESULTS: A total of 1219 encounters were examined. Compared with those patients without TOC participation, those who used the TOC program had a 67% decreased odds of all-cause 30-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.48; P < 0.0001) and a 62% decreased odds of a related readmission (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Community pharmacists and Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience-level student pharmacists have the potential to make a significant impact on reducing hospital readmission rates.

Student Pharmacist Perceptions of a Behind-The-Counter Class of Medications.

OBJECTIVES: To report perceptions of PharmD candidates regarding a behind-the-counter (BTC) class of medications and to identify perceived barriers to its successful implementation. METHODS: PharmD candidates in their second, third, and fourth professional years were invited to complete an online survey. Responses were used to assess perceptions of competency and willingness to participate in a BTC program and perceived preparedness of the current community pharmacy practice environment for a BTC class of medications with regard to 8 specific classes of medications. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 28%. In all, 78% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that a BTC class of medications is a change that they would be willing to embrace, and 54% agreed or strongly agreed that their PharmD curriculum provided them with adequate training in laboratory and diagnostic test interpretation. Less than half of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that community pharmacies are currently equipped with the resources necessary to clinically assess a patient and dispense BTC medications. CONCLUSION: PharmD candidates are prepared and willing to participate in a BTC program but believe that the current community practice environment lacks access to resources necessary to do so.

Statin Adherence Rates in Patients Utilizing a Patient-Centered Medical Home-Based Pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence contributes to approximately US$290 billion per year in avoidable health-care spending. Statins are of particular interest because of their importance to patient outcomes, costs of treatment failure, and categorization as a Medicare star measure linked to financial reimbursement. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate statin adherence as defined by the proportion of days covered (PDC) among patients who use an embedded dispensing pharmacy in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of Lifetime Health Medical Group's electronic health record and third-party prescription claims data of statin therapy. Statin adherence is reported using PDC, with 0.8 or greater considered adherent for statin therapy. Statistics used include 2-sample unpaired t test to compare PDC between gender and age, and analysis of variance was used to determine differences in PDC among different insurance types. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients were included, and 917 statin prescriptions were filled. PDC for statin medications in the population was 0.92 ± 0.20. Eighty-six percent of patients were considered adherent, with a PDC ≥80%. The average insurance and patient costs for brand prescriptions (n = 106) were US$233 ± US$143 and US$31 ± US$27, respectively, and costs for generic prescriptions (n = 811) were US$8 ± US$13 and US$7 ± US$6, respectively. CONCLUSION: Statin adherence rates for patients utilizing a dispensing pharmacy embedded in a large PCMH exceed the national average of 40% to 50% adherence.

Practice-based learning experience to develop residents as clinical faculty members.

PURPOSE: A practice-based learning experience designed to expose postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) and 2 (PGY2) residents to and prepare them for a career as clinical faculty is described. SUMMARY: A practice-based learning experience was designed to give PGY1 and PGY2 residents exposure to the responsibilities of a clinical faculty member, integrating clinical practice, preceptor duties, and other academia-related responsibilities. The learning experience is a four-week, elective rotation for PGY1 and PGY2 residents. The rotation is designed to correspond to a four-week advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) rotation, allowing the resident to work continuously with the same one or two APPE students for the entire rotation. The resident is required to design and implement a rotation for the students and provide clinical services while integrating students into daily tasks, facilitating topic and patient discussions, evaluating assignments, providing constructive feedback, and assigning a final rotation grade. The resident also attends all academic and committee meetings and teaching obligations with his or her residency director, if applicable. The resident is mentored by the residency director throughout all phases of the rotation and is evaluated using goals and objectives tailored to this experience. CONCLUSION: The development of a formal, structured rotation to give postgraduate residents experience as a preceptor provided an opportunity for residents to further explore their interests in academia and allowed them to serve as a primary preceptor while being guided and evaluated by a mentor.

Clinical and economic impact of a diabetes clinical pharmacy service program in a university and primary care-based collaboration model.

OBJECTIVE: To provide program methodology and outcomes data identifying the impact of clinical pharmacy services (CPSs) in patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Longitudinal pre-post cohort study. SETTING: Regional primary care group in Buffalo, NY, during 2006-2007. PATIENTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes identified by their primary care providers were referred to the MedSense program; a pharmacist-led, patient-centered pharmacotherapy management program developed through university collaboration with a regional primary care physician group. INTERVENTIONS: Education, clinical assessments, provider recommendations, and longitudinal follow-up of treatment goals provided by MedSense pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcomes were followed for 1 year from the index date for primary diabetes endpoints (glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose) and accompanying metabolic parameters (body mass index, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides). Economic endpoints from the payer perspective were also followed for 1 year from the index date for medical and prescription-related costs. RESULTS: Primary diabetes endpoints were significantly reduced versus baseline at the 6-month (-1.1%; P < 0.0001, -39 mg/dL; P = 0.003) and 12-month (-1.1%; P < 0.0001, -35 mg/dL; P = 0.005) assessments. Improvement rates were observed for all accompanying metabolic parameters at each assessment (range 40-64%). Geometric mean costs tended to decrease versus baseline at 6-month (-$84; P = 0.785) and 12-month (-$216; P = 0.414) assessments, despite nominal increases in diabetes and total medication costs. CONCLUSION: In this CPS model, there were initial and sustained reductions in the primary diabetes endpoints and a high rate of improvement for accompanying metabolic parameters. Concurrent with clinical improvements, total direct medical costs were reduced despite an increase in antidiabetic medication and total medication costs.

Costs of treating lower respiratory tract infections.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the direct medical costs of treating lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in a managed care organization (MCO). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a regional MCO identifying adults diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) or community- acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: A claims database examination of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes was conducted to identify adults receiving initial outpatient care for an LRTI during 2005-2006. Medical record review then was conducted to verify clinical diagnosis of AECB or CAP. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Outpatient office and clinic visits, hospitalization, and radiology, pathology, and pharmacy records were used to determine treatment costs. Treatment failure was determined by use of a second antibiotic course, follow-up emergency room presentation, or hospitalization for LRTI within 28 days of the index visit. The primary outcome was per-case treatment cost from the payer perspective. RESULTS: Clinical diagnosis was confirmed for 65 unique coded visits (60 patients; 39 with AECB, 22 with CAP; 1 in both cohorts). Initial visit, initial diagnostic testing, and subsequent hospitalization accounted for the majority (63%) of payer costs. Antibiotics were responsible for 15% of payer costs. Higher initial antibiotic expenditure in the AECB cohort yielded a cost-benefit ratio of 3:1. Mean per-case costs for success and failure were $277 & $372 for AECB, and $493 & $3019 for CAP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Initial visit and hospitalization costs contribute the majority of payer expenditure while antibiotic expenditure incurs a nominal burden. Higher expenditure on initial antibiotic therapy in the AECB population appears to be beneficial.