[Which typical foot fractures should the radiologist know?] / Welche typischen Fußfrakturen sollte der Radiologe kennen?

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Due to mechanical loading and the number of joints involved, fractures of the foot are among the most common fractures. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: X-ray is basis for diagnostic workup of all foot fractures. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: For stress fractures, the additional use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated. Computed tomography (CT) can be used for preoperative imaging of intraarticular tarsal fractures. PERFORMANCE: Simple traumatic fractures can be reliably diagnosed by X­ray. On the other hand, there is a poor sensitivity for stress fractures. ACHIEVEMENTS: Using a combination of X­ray, MRI, and CT, it is possible to reliably diagnosis and classify foot fractures. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The first step to diagnose a foot fracture should be the X­ray. CT and MRI can also be used to detect intra-articular fractures and MRI can be used for stress fractures.

Carbon dioxide-contrasted computed tomography angiography: high pitch protocols and adapted injection parameters improve imaging quality.

PURPOSE: To systematically investigate the impact of image acquisition and contrast injection parameters for CO2-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) of the aorto-iliac and peripheral arteries in a pig model using commercially available equipment. The aim was to establish an imaging protocol that is ready for use in human subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three domestic swine underwent CO2-CTA with varying injection parameters: pitch (1.0, 3.0), injection pressure (0.7 bar, 1.0 bar, 1.3 bar) and scan delay (2 s, 4 s, 6 s). Objective (vessel diameter) and subjective (image quality) parameters and applied radiation doses were systematically evaluated. To ensure clinical applicability of the setting, only approved catheters/injectors and standard injection parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The image quality scores were superior and the vessel diameter was larger with high pitch in comparison to standard pitch (diameters: 4.7 ± 2.0 mm vs. 3.6 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.0040, scores: 2.6 ± 1.1 vs. 2.0 ± 1.1, p = 0.0038). High injection pressure (1.3 bar) improved the image quality as assessed by subjective and objective ratings (diameters: 3.6 ± 2.0 mm, 4.0 ± 2.1 mm and 4.6 ± 2.1 mm, for 0.7, 1.0 and 1.3 bar, p-values ≤ 0.0052, scores: 1.9 ± 1.1, 2.3 ± 1.1 and 2.7 ± 1.2, p-values ≤ 0.0017), the same was observed for a shorter injection delay (diameters: 3.5 ± 2.0 mm, 4.2 ± 2.1 mm and 4.8 ± 2.1 mm, for 6 s, 4 s, and 2 s, p ≤ 0.0022, scores: 1.9 ± 1.1, 2.3 ± 1.1 and 2.7 ± 1.1, p-values ≤ 0.0013). The dose length products were 239 ± 47 mGycm (high pitch) and 565 ± 63 mGycm (standard pitch, p-values < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A higher pitch, shorter delay and higher injection pressure improve image quality in CO2-enhanced CTA. Since commercially available, clinically approved equipment was used. The protocol is now ready for use in human subjects.