A feasibility, pharmacokinetic and frequency-escalation trial of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in high risk gastrointestinal tract cancer.

AIMS: To assess the feasibility, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerable frequency (MTF) of intraperitoneal (IP) 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FU/LV) added, as a regional boost, to intravenous chemotherapy after resection of gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients were recruited following gastrointestinal cancer resection (43 colon; 10 stomach/small bowel) with serosal involvement. Peritoneal ports were implanted and IP fluid distribution evaluated ultrasonically. Twelve patients were studied for pharmacokinetics; 44 (41 evaluable) for MTF. Treatment was weekly intravenous bolus FU/LV for 6 months; to this was added IP FU/LV (400/20 mg/m(2) in 1500 ml 4% icodextrin) with increasing frequency from 4 weekly to 1 weekly in four successive cohorts. RESULTS: Peritoneal fluid distribution was excellent. Intraperitoneal FU exposure (AUC) after IP treatment was >1000-fold plasma AUC after IP treatment (regional pharmacokinetic advantage), and >100-fold plasma AUC after intravenous treatment (regional therapeutic advantage). IP therapy was well tolerated if given every 4, 3 or 2 weeks, but not weekly: 11/13, 7/8, 10/13 and 0/7 patients respectively completed treatment without IP modification in these cohorts. Problems with peritoneal access occurred in 20% of patients. CONCLUSION: Adding fortnightly IP FU/LV to a standard intravenous regimen is safe, tolerable and provides high peritoneal FU exposure. More reliable peritoneal access is needed to improve the feasibility of this otherwise promising therapeutic approach.

Irinotecan, cisplatin and mitomycin in inoperable gastro-oesophageal and pancreatic cancers - a new active regimen.

Irinotecan, mitomycin and cisplatin all demonstrate activity in gastro-oesophageal cancers. This novel combination was administered to outpatients with previously untreated inoperable gastro-oesophageal or pancreatic cancer, in a 28-day cycle. A total of 26 out of 31 patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer and 12 out of 14 patients with pancreatic cancer have been treated with this combination, and were evaluable for response. The overall response rates for patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer was 42%, with a median survival of 9.5 months. In patients with pancreatic cancer, the overall response rate was 42% with a median survival of 8 months. There was a statistically significant increase in survival between those patients who achieved a stable disease response and those who achieved either a partial response or complete response. The toxicity profiles for both cancers were virtually identical. There were five treatment-related deaths, and a high admission rate (42%). Thus irinotecan, mitomycin and cisplatin is a new combination with activity in inoperable upper gastro-oesophageal cancers, but with a high toxicity profile. Future developments include reducing the dose of irinotecan and number of cycles of therapy to four.

Limited phase I study of morphine-3-glucuronide.

The toxicity of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) has been investigated in an open, uncontrolled, single-blinded, single dose study over a limited range of doses. Three cohorts each of three healthy volunteers received 7.5, 15, and 30 mg/70 kg intravenous (IV) M3G. Blood sampling was undertaken for the following 24 h. Subjective toxicity was recorded on visual analogue scales and plasma M3G concentrations measured by a specific HPLC assay. Virtually no effects and no change in cardiovascular or respiratory parameters were seen. The pharmacokinetics fitted a two-compartment model. The mean elimination half-life (+/- S.D.) of M3G was 1.66 (+/- 0.47) h. Mean AUC standardized to a dose of 1 mg/70 kg was 228 (+/- 62) etamolL(-1) x h. Mean M3G clearance was 169 (+/- 48) mLmin(-1) and the mean volume of distribution was 23.1 (+/- 4.8) liters. At the doses investigated there were no clear neuroexcitatory effects, no opioid effects, and the pharmacokinetics were very similar to those of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G).

The pharmacokinetics of morphine and morphine glucuronide metabolites after subcutaneous bolus injection and subcutaneous infusion of morphine.

AIMS: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) in healthy volunteers after the administration of morphine by subcutaneous bolus injection (s.c.b.) and subcutaneous infusion (s.c. i.) over 4 h, and to compare the results with the intravenous bolus (i.v.) administration of morphine. METHODS: Six healthy volunteers each received 5 mg morphine sulphate by i.v., s.c.b. and short s.c.i. over 4 h, on three separate occasions, in random order, each separated by at least 1 week. Plasma samples were assayed for morphine, M6G and M3G. RESULTS: After i.v. morphine, the concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G and their pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those we have observed previously, in other healthy volunteers (when standardized to nmol l- 1, for a 10 mg dose to a 70 kg subject). After s.c.b. morphine, similar results were obtained except that the median tmax values for morphine and M3G were significantly longer than after i.v. morphine (P< 0.001 and P< 0.05, respectively), with a trend to a longer tmax for M6G (P = 0. 09). The appearance half-lives after s.c.b. morphine for M6G and M3G were also significantly longer than after i.v. morphine (P = 0.03 and P< 0.05, respectively). Comparison of log-transformed AUC values indicated that i.v. and s.c.b. administration of morphine were bioequivalent with respect to morphine, M6G and M3G. In comparison with i.v. morphine, morphine by s.c.i. was associated with significantly longer median tmax values for morphine (P< 0.001), M6G (P< 0.001) and M3G (P< 0.05), and the mean standardized Cmax values significantly lower than after both i.v. and s.c.b. morphine (morphine P< 0.001, M6G P< 0.001 and M3G P< 0.01 for each comparison). Comparison of log-transformed AUC values after i.v. and s.c.i. morphine indicated that the two routes were not bioequivalent for morphine (log-transformed AUC ratio 0.78, 90% CI 0.66-0.93), M6G (0.72, 90% CI 0.63-0.82), or M3G (0.65, 90% CI 0.54-0.78). A small stability study indicated no evidence of adsorptive losses from morphine infused over 4 h using the infusion devices from the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although bioequivalence was demonstrated between the s. c.b. and i.v. routes of morphine administration, the bioavailabilities of morphine, M6G and M3G after s.c.i. were significantly lower than after i.v. administration. However, despite this, the study demonstrates that the subcutaneous route is an effective method for the parenteral administration of morphine.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of the activity of the morphine glucuronides.

BACKGROUND: Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is an active metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic activity. Morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), the most prevalent metabolite, has minimal affinity for opioid receptors. It has been suggested from animal model data and by examination of metabolite ratios in humans that M3G may functionally antagonize the respiratory depressant and analgesic actions of morphine and M6G. METHODS: We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 10 healthy volunteers. The trial had 6 arms: (1) placebo, (2) 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, (3) 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G, (4) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G, (5) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, and (6) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G; all were give by slow intravenous bolus. Analgesia was assessed with the use of the submaximal ischemic pain model. The effects were quantified on numerical and visual analogue scales. Respiratory parameters and response to steady state 5% carbon dioxide challenge were assessed with spirometry, mass spectroscopy, and earlobe blood gas analysis. RESULTS: Morphine and M6G produced significant pain relief compared with placebo (morphine, P < .0001; M6G, P = .033). Pain relief after M6G was less than after morphine (P = .009) and M3G was no better than placebo (P = .26). Pain relief with morphine and M6G were not significantly altered by M3G (P = .59 and P = .28, respectively). Significant and similar dysphoria and sedation occurred with both morphine (P < .002) and M6G (P < .016) but were absent with both M3G and placebo. Respiratory parameters suggested that M6G produced less respiratory depression than morphine. Both morphine and M6G caused a significant reduction in respiratory drive compared with placebo (morphine, P = .002; M6G, P = .013); this effect was not reversed by M3G (P = .35 and P = .83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: M3G appears to be devoid of significant activity; in these circumstances and at these doses, it does not antagonize either the analgesic or respiratory depressant effects of M6G or morphine.

An analysis of first-time enquirers to the CancerBACUP information service: variations with cancer site, demographic status and geographical location.

A retrospective comparison of cancer incidence data and, where relevant, population data with 16,955 first-time users (patients, relatives and friends) of a national cancer information service (CancerBACUP) during the period April 1995 to March 1996 is presented. The number of events observed was compared with the number of events expected, were the national rates of cancer incidence and population demographics apply. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) (observed - expected ratios) were used to indicate any differences. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) in the observed and expected sex, age and primary site distribution of patients enquired about were found. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) were also identified for the age, employment status, socioeconomic class and geographical location of first-time enquirers (patients, relatives and friends). Enquiries about brain, testis and breast cancers and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were substantially higher than expected; enquiries about bladder, lung, stomach and colorectal cancers were much lower than expected. As the service is provided via a freephone number, it is available to all, and users might be expected to be randomly distributed across the variables listed. The underlying reasons for the differences identified need to be investigated, and the role of information in the care of cancer patients should be formally evaluated.

Epirubicin, cisplatin and oral UFT with leucovorin ('ECU'): a phase I-II study in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, protracted venous fluorouracil) is superior to FAMTX in gastroesophageal cancer, but protracted fluorouracil adds to its morbidity and cost. In this dose-escalation pilot study, fluorouracil was replaced by oral UFT and leucovorin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty unpretreated patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal cancers received epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and leucovorin 45 mg p.o. on days 1, 8 and 15, of a 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. UFT was taken 12-hourly throughout, at escalating doses in four cohorts ranging from 150-325 mg/m2 per day. RESULTS: The maximum tolerable dose of UFT, recommended for further study, was 200 mg/m2 per day. At higher doses, more than two-thirds patients required dose reductions, although mostly for persistent mild (CTC grade 2) nausea, diarrhoea or fatigue, rather than for severe acute toxicity. Myelotoxicity was mild. Twenty patients, including 15 with gastroesophageal cancer, had assessable disease. Among these there were nine WHO objective responses, all in gastroesophageal patients, including two radiological complete responses. CONCLUSIONS: ECU is well tolerated at the defined dose, with activity comparable to ECF in gastroesophageal cancer. UFT and other oral 5FU dosing strategies make promising components of combination chemotherapy, deserving further, randomised evaluation.

Cancer information: a cost-effective intervention.

There is a considerable knowledge base about the information needs of patients with cancer (and their relatives and friends). Those needs will vary according to the disease, the stage of disease, the patient and his or her age, social class and culture. Lack of information may lead to increased anxiety and distress, may impact negatively on the patient's satisfaction and may influence a patient's treatment choices. Other articles in this special edition deal with psychosocial interventions and complementary therapies for cancer patients and explore their efficacy. The reality is that these are unlikely to be made available to all cancer patients for reasons of cost and practicability. Information, however, is a relatively cheap intervention that could--and should--be part of standard care. This article explores some of the research about the provision of information for cancer patients.

Phase II trial of topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous infusion in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Topotecan (9-dimethylaminoethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor. Twenty-six patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated in a multicenter study with topotecan 0.6 mg/m2/day for 21 days by continuous intravenous infusion every 28 days; this starting dose was decreased to 0.5 mg/m2/day in the last 23 patients because of myelosuppression. There was one partial response, for a response rate of 4% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%-19.6%). Median survival was 9 months. One-year survival was 39%. Of the 58 lung cancer symptoms at baseline, 40% were resolved by the end of best response (all in the partial response patient, 62% in stable disease patients, 26% in progressive disease patients). Catheter-related infections complicated 19% of courses. Red-cell transfusions were given in 50% of courses. Toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (4%), grade 3-4 anemia (19%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (8%), and catheter-related infections (19% courses). Although the major objective response rate was only 4%, patients treated with topotecan given as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion experienced a decrease in cancer-related symptoms and a 1-year survival of 39%.

Demonstration of hepatic steatosis by computerized tomography in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-based therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

The frequency and severity of fatty infiltration of the liver in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid has not been documented systematically. Its development can result in difficulty assessing disease progression, and treatment may be altered inappropriately. Twenty-seven patients with colon cancer and liver metastases receiving 5-FU and folinic acid were studied with computerized tomography (CT) before treatment and after six or 12 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-seven per cent of patients developed hepatic steatosis during treatment. There was no correlation between development of hepatic steatosis and the dose of chemotherapy or the liver function tests. Hepatic steatosis occurs commonly in patients receiving 5-FU and folinic acid and can be severe. Its development can make hepatic metastases difficult to assess and if its benign nature is not appreciated treatment may be inappropriately altered.

A pharmacokinetic study of sublingual aerosolized morphine in healthy volunteers.

A pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare the pharmacokinetics of morphine after an intravenous dose with the pharmacokinetics after a sublingual dose administered from an aerosol. Plasma levels of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were measured in five normal volunteers after morphine administration by the intravenous route and from a novel sublingual pressurized aerosol formulation. The mean (+/- s.d.) bioavailability of the sublingual aerosol morphine was 19.7 +/- 6.7%. The morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine and the morphine-6-glucuronide/morphine ratios were 5.1 +/- 1.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.4, respectively, for the intravenous route and 28.3 +/- 11.3 and 5.2 +/- 1.4, respectively, for the sublingual route. The combined total areas under the plots of systemic concentration against time (AUC) for the metabolites after the two routes was not significantly different. When compared with published data for oral administration the results demonstrate that the sublingual aerosol morphine might provide an alternative to conventional methods of morphine delivery, and has similar pharmacokinetics to a sublingual morphine tablet. It has no particular pharmacokinetic advantages over oral morphine, except a potential for a faster onset of analgesia. Bioavailability, maximum plasma concentration, Cpmax, and the time at which the maximum plasma concentration is reached, Tmax, are equivalent to those for orally administered morphine.

Emotional support for cancer patients: what do patients really want?

For many cancer patients and their families the experience of cancer is an intensely stressful one. Emotional support is important for most cancer patients during their illness and can be gained from different people and services. This study evaluates patients' attitudes to different sources of support and rates their satisfaction with sources already used. A total of 431 patients completed a questionnaire covering the use of different sources, including individuals, support groups and information sources. The questionnaire also incorporated validated measurements of anxiety, depression and locus of control. The results revealed that the three most important sources of emotional support were senior registrars (73%) and family (73%), followed by consultants (63%). Patients would prefer doctor- and nurse-led support groups to patient only-led groups (26% vs 12%). Pamphlets, such as the BACUP booklets, proved the most important of the informational sources sought (50%). A total of 86% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the emotional support received. Patients who expressed dissatisfaction with their emotional support were significantly more likely to be anxious and depressed (P < 0.001). Patients who used information sources were more likely to have a higher locus of control over the course of their disease. These results show how important the doctor's role is in the provision of emotional support.

Randomized trial assessing the addition of interferon alpha-2a to fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of interferon alpha-2a (IFN alpha) on the efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil (FUra) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to FUra/LV alone or FUra/LV plus IFN alpha. All patients received: LV 200 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 2 hours, then FUra 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus plus 400 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 22 hours, all repeated on day 2. Treatment was every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Patients randomized to IFN alpha received 6 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously every 48 hours throughout. Objective response (OR) and toxicity were assessed conventionally; in addition, palliative benefit and adverse effects were assessed using quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires. RESULTS: There were no differences in OR rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival. OR rates in assessable patients were as follows: FUra/LV alone (n = 104), complete or partial response (OR) = 27%, no change (NC) = 34%; FUra/LV/IFN alpha (n = 101), OR = 28%, NC = 30%. Median survival was 10 months in both arms. Dose-limiting FUra toxicities were not significantly increased by co-administration of IFN alpha, and the delivered FUra dose-intensity was not significantly reduced. However, QoL was adversely affected: patients on IFN alpha were less likely to report improvement in pretreatment physical and psychologic symptoms, and more likely to report new or worsening symptoms. CONCLUSION: IFN alpha, at a dose that impaired QoL, did not improve the efficacy of FUra/LV. The power of this trial is sufficient to exclude with 95% confidence a benefit of 15% in OR or 10 weeks in median survival. Accordingly, we cannot recommend the use of IFN alpha as a clinical modulator of FUra/LV in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.