Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
- IMPACC group; Al Ozonoff; Joanna Schaenman; Naresh Doni Jayavelu; Carly E. Milliren; Carolyn S. Calfee; Charles B. Cairns; Monica Kraft; Lindsey R. Baden; Albert C. Shaw; Florian Krammer; Harm Van Bakel; Denise Esserman; Shanshan Liu; Ana Fernandez Sesma; Viviana Simon; David A. Hafler; Ruth R. Montgomery; Steven H. Kleinstein; Ofer Levy; Christian Bime; Elias K. Haddad; David J. Erle; Bali Pulendran; Kari C. Nadeau; Mark M. Davis; Catherine L. Hough; William B. Messer; Nelson I. Agudelo Higuita; Jordan P. Metcalf; Mark A. Atkinson; Scott C. Brakenridge; David B. Corry; Farrah Kheradmand; Lauren I. R. Ehrlich; Esther Melamed; Grace A. McComsey; Rafick Sekaly; Joann Diray-Arce; Bjoern Peters; Alison D. Augustine; Elaine F. Reed; Kerry McEnaney; Brenda Barton; Claudia Lentucci; Mehmet Saluvan; Ana C. Chang; Annmarie Hoch; Marisa Albert; Tanzia Shaheen; Alvin Kho; Sanya Thomas; Jing Chen; Maimouna D. Murphy; Mitchell Cooney; Scott Presnell; Leying Guan; Jeremy Gygi; Shrikant Pawar; Anderson Brito; Zain Khalil; James A. Overton; Randi Vita; Kerstin Westendorf; Cole Maguire; Slim Fourati; Ramin Salehi-Rad; Aleksandra Leligdowicz; Michael Matthay; Jonathan Singer; Kirsten N. Kangelaris; Carolyn M. Hendrickson; Matthew F. Krummel; Charles R. Langelier; Prescott G. Woodruff; Debra L. Powell; James N. Kim; Brent Simmons; I.Michael Goonewardene; Cecilia M. Smith; Mark Martens; Jarrod Mosier; Hiroki Kimura; Amy Sherman; Stephen Walsh; Nicolas Issa; Charles Dela Cruz; Shelli Farhadian; Akiko Iwasaki; Albert I. Ko; Evan J. Anderson; Aneesh Mehta; Jonathan E. Sevransky; Sharon Chinthrajah; Neera Ahuja; Angela Rogers; Maja Artandi; Sarah A.R. Siegel; Zhengchun Lu; Douglas A. Drevets; Brent R. Brown; Matthew L. Anderson; Faheem W. Guirgis; Rama V. Thyagarajan; Justin Rousseau; Dennis Wylie; Johanna Busch; Saurin Gandhi; Todd A. Triplett; George Yendewa; Olivia Giddings; Tatyana Vaysman; Bernard Khor; Adeeb Rahman; Daniel Stadlbauer; Jayeeta Dutta; Hui Xie; Seunghee Kim-Schulze; Ana Silvia Gonzalez-Reiche; Adriana van de Guchte; Holden T. Maecker; Keith Farrugia; Zenab Khan; Joanna Schaenman; Elaine F. Reed; Ramin Salehi-Rad; David Elashoff; Jenny Brook; Estefania Ramires-Sanchez; Megan Llamas; Adreanne Rivera; Claudia Perdomo; Dawn C. Ward; Clara E. Magyar; Jennifer Fulcher; Yumiko Abe-Jones; Saurabh Asthana; Alexander Beagle; Sharvari Bhide; Sidney A. Carrillo; Suzanna Chak; Rajani Ghale; Ana Gonzales; Alejandra Jauregui; Norman Jones; Tasha Lea; Deanna Lee; Raphael Lota; Jeff Milush; Viet Nguyen; Logan Pierce; Priya Prasad; Arjun Rao; Bushra Samad; Cole Shaw; Austin Sigman; Pratik Sinha; Alyssa Ward; Andrew - Willmore; Jenny Zhan; Sadeed Rashid; Nicklaus Rodriguez; Kevin Tang; Luz Torres Altamirano; Legna Betancourt; Cindy Curiel; Nicole Sutter; Maria Tercero Paz; Gayelan Tietje-Ulrich; Carolyn Leroux; Jennifer Connors; Mariana Bernui; Michele Kutzler; Carolyn Edwards; Edward Lee; Edward Lin; Brett Croen; Nicholas Semenza; Brandon Rogowski; Nataliya Melnyk; Kyra Woloszczuk; Gina Cusimano; Matthew Bell; Sara Furukawa; Renee McLin; Pamela Marrero; Julie Sheidy; George P. Tegos; Crystal Nagle; Nathan Mege; Kristen Ulring; Vicki Seyfert-Margolis; Michelle Conway; Dave Francisco; Allyson Molzahn; Heidi Erickson; Connie Cathleen Wilson; Ron Schunk; Trina Hughes; Bianca Sierra; Kinga K. Smolen; Michael Desjardins; Simon van Haren; Xhoi Mitre; Jessica Cauley; Xiofang Li; Alexandra Tong; Bethany Evans; Christina Montesano; Jose Humberto Licona; Jonathan Krauss; Jun Bai Park Chang; Natalie Izaguirre; Omkar Chaudhary; Andreas Coppi; John Fournier; Subhasis Mohanty; M. Catherine Muenker; Allison Nelson; Khadir Raddassi; Michael Rainone; William Ruff; Syim Salahuddin; Wade L. Schulz; Pavithra Vijayakumar; Haowei Wang; Elsio Wunder Jr.; H. Patrick Young; Yujiao Zhao; Miti Saksena; Deena Altman; Erna Kojic; Komal Srivastava; Lily Q. Eaker; Maria Carolina Bermudez; Katherine F. Beach; Levy A. Sominsky; Arman Azad; Juan Manuel Carreno; Gagandeep Singh; Ariel Raskin; Johnstone Tcheou; Dominika Bielak; Hisaaki Kawabata; Lubbertus CF Mulder; Giulio Kleiner; Laurel Bristow; Laila Hussaini; Kieffer Hellmeister; Hady Samaha; Andrew Cheng; Christine Spainhour; Erin M. Scherer; Brandi Johnson; Amer Bechnak; Caroline R. Ciric; Lauren Hewitt; Bernadine Panganiban; Chistopher Huerta; Jacob Usher; Erin Carter; Nina Mcnair; Susan Pereira Ribeiro; Alexandra S. Lee; Evan Do; Andrea Fernandes; Monali Manohar; Thomas Hagan; Catherine Blish; Hena Naz Din; Jonasel Roque; Samuel S. Yang; Amanda E. Brunton; Peter E. Sullivan; Matthew Strnad; Zoe L. Lyski; Felicity J. Coulter; John L. Booth; Lauren A. Sinko; Lyle Moldawer; Brittany Borrensen; Brittney Roth-Manning; Li-Zhen Song; Ebony Nelson; Megan Lewis-Smith; Jacob Smith; Pablo Guaman Tipan; Nadia Siles; Sam Bazzi; Janelle Geltman; Kerin Hurley; Giovanni Gabriele; Scott Sieg; Matthew C. Altman; Patrice M. Becker; Nadine Rouphael.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22273396

RESUMO

BackgroundBetter understanding of the association between characteristics of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and outcome is needed to further improve upon patient management. MethodsImmunophenotyping Assessment in a COVID-19 Cohort (IMPACC) is a prospective, observational study of 1,164 patients from 20 hospitals across the United States. Disease severity was assessed using a 7-point ordinal scale based on degree of respiratory illness. Patients were prospectively surveyed for 1 year after discharge for post-acute sequalae of COVID-19 (PASC) through quarterly surveys. Demographics, comorbidities, radiographic findings, clinical laboratory values, SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology were captured over a 28-day period. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. FindingsThe median age was 59 years (interquartile range [IQR] 20); 711 (61%) were men; overall mortality was 14%, and 228 (20%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Unsupervised clustering of ordinal score over time revealed distinct disease course trajectories. Risk factors associated with prolonged hospitalization or death by day 28 included age [≥] 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% CI 1.28-3.17), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.71; 95% CI 1.13-2.57), elevated baseline creatinine (OR 2.80; 95% CI 1.63-4.80) or troponin (OR 1.89; 95% 1.03-3.47), baseline lymphopenia (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.61-2.97), presence of infiltrate by chest imaging (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.96-5.10), and high SARS-CoV2 viral load (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.17-2.00). Fatal cases had the lowest ratio of SARS-CoV-2 antibody to viral load levels compared to other trajectories over time (p=0.001). 589 survivors (51%) completed at least one survey at follow-up with 305 (52%) having at least one symptom consistent with PASC, most commonly dyspnea (56% among symptomatic patients). Female sex was the only associated risk factor for PASC. InterpretationIntegration of PCR cycle threshold, and antibody values with demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory/radiographic findings identified risk factors for 28-day outcome severity, though only female sex was associated with PASC. Longitudinal clinical phenotyping offers important insights, and provides a framework for immunophenotyping for acute and long COVID-19. FundingNIH RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe did a systematic search of the PubMed database from January 1st, 2020 until April 24th, 2022 using the search terms: "hospitalized" AND "SARS-CoV-2" OR "COVID-19" AND "Pro-spective" AND "Antibody" OR "PCR" OR "long term follow up" and applying the following filters: "Multicenter Study" AND "Observational Study". No language restrictions were applied. While clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features associated with severe COVID-19 in hospitalized adults have been described, description of the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 specific assays available to clinicians (e.g. PCR and binding antibody) and their integration with other variables is scarce for both short and long term follow up. The current literature is comprised of several studies with small sample size, cross-sectional design with laboratory data typically only recorded at a single point in time (e.g., on admission), limited clinical characteristics, variable duration of follow up, single-center setting, retrospective analyses, kinetics of either PCR or antibody testing but not both, and outcomes such as death or, mechanical ventilation that do not allow delineation of variations in clinical course. Added value of this studyIn our large longitudinal multicenter cohort, the description of outcome severity, was not limited to survival versus death, but encompassed a clinical trajectory approach leveraging longitudinal data based on time in hospital, disease severity by ordinal scale based on degree of respiratory illness, and presence or absence of limitations at discharge. Fatal COVID-19 cases had the lowest ratio of antibody to viral load levels over time as compared to non-fatal cases. Integration of PCR cycle threshold and antibody values with demographics, baseline comorbidities, and laboratory/radiographic findings identified additional risk factors for outcome severity over the first 28 days. However, female sex was the only variable associated with persistence of symptoms over time. Persistence of symptoms was not associated with clinical trajectory over the first 28 days, nor with antibody/viral loads from the acute phase. Implications of all the available evidenceThe described calculated ratio (binding IgG/PCR Ct value) is unique compared to other studies, reflecting host pathogen interactions and representing an accessible approach for patient risk stratification. Integration of SARS-CoV-2 viral load and binding antibody kinetics with other laboratory as well as clinical characteristics in hospitalized COVID-19 patients can identify patients likely to have the most severe short-term outcomes, but is not predictive of symptom persistence at one year post-discharge.

2.
Preprint em Inglês | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-475248

RESUMO

SARS-CoV-2 lineages are continuously evolving. As of December 2021, the AY.4.2 Delta sub-lineage represented 20 % of sequenced strains in UK and has been detected in dozens of countries. It has since then been supplanted by the Omicron variant. AY.4.2 displays three additional mutations (T95I, Y145H and A222V) in the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the spike when compared to the original Delta variant (B.1.617.2) and remains poorly characterized. Here, we analyzed the fusogenicity of the AY.4.2 spike and the sensitivity of an authentic AY.4.2 isolate to neutralizing antibodies. The AY.4.2 spike exhibited similar fusogenicity and binding to ACE2 than Delta. The sensitivity of infectious AY.4.2 to a panel of monoclonal neutralizing antibodies was similar to Delta, except for the anti-RBD Imdevimab, which showed incomplete neutralization. Sensitivity of AY.4.2 to sera from individuals having received two or three doses of Pfizer or two doses of AstraZeneca vaccines was reduced by 1.7 to 2.1 fold, when compared to Delta. Our results suggest that mutations in the NTD remotely impair the efficacy of anti-RBD antibodies. The temporary spread of AY.4.2 was not associated with major changes in spike function but rather to a partially reduced neutralization sensitivity.

3.
Preprint em Inglês | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-473528

RESUMO

Memory B cells (MBCs) represent a second layer of immune protection against SARS-CoV-2. Whether MBCs elicited by mRNA vaccines can recognize the Omicron variant is of major concern. We used bio-layer interferometry to assess the affinity against the receptor-binding-domain (RBD) of Omicron spike of 313 naturally expressed monoclonal IgG that were previously tested for affinity and neutralization against VOC prior to Omicron. We report here that Omicron evades recognition from a larger fraction of these antibodies than any of the previous VOCs. Additionally, whereas 30% of these antibodies retained high affinity against Omicron-RBD, our analysis suggest that Omicron specifically evades antibodies displaying potent neutralizing activity against the D614G and Beta variant viruses. Further studies are warranted to understand the consequences of a lower memory B cell potency on the overall protection associated with current vaccines.

4.
Preprint em Inglês | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-448459

RESUMO

How a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection may amplify and model the memory B cell (MBC) response elicited by mRNA vaccines was addressed by a comparative longitudinal study of two cohorts, naive individuals and disease-recovered patients, up to 2 months after vaccination. The quality of the memory response was assessed by analysis of the VDJ repertoire, affinity and neutralization against variants of concerns (VOC), using unbiased cultures of 2452 MBCs. Upon boost, the MBC pool of recovered patients selectively expanded, further matured and harbored potent neutralizers against VOC. Maturation of the MBC response in naive individuals was much less pronounced. Nevertheless, and as opposed to their weaker neutralizing serum response, half of their RBD-specific MBCs displayed high affinity towards multiple VOC and one-third retained neutralizing potency against B.1.351. Thus, repeated vaccine challenges could reduce these differences by recall of affinity-matured MBCs and allow naive vaccinees to cope efficiently with VOC.

5.
Preprint em Inglês | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-434089

RESUMO

There are concerns about neutralizing antibodies (NAb) potency against the newly emerged VOC202012/01 (UK) and 501Y.V2 (SA) SARS-CoV-2 variants in mRNA-vaccinated subjects and in recovered COVID-19 patients. We used a viral neutralization test with a strict 100% neutralizing criterion on UK and SA clinical isolates in comparison with a globally distributed D614G SARS-CoV-2 strain. In two doses BNT162b2-vaccinated healthcare workers (HCW), despite heterogeneity in neutralizing capacity against the three SARS-CoV-2 strains, most of the sera harbored at least a NAb titer [≥] 1:10 suggesting a certain humoral protection activity either on UK or SA variants. However, six months after mild forms of COVID-19, an important proportion of HCW displayed no neutralizing activity against SA strain. This result supports strong recommendations for vaccination of previously infected subjects.

6.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21253653

RESUMO

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to an unprecedented daily use of molecular RT-PCR tests. These tests are interpreted qualitatively for diagnosis, and the relevance of the test result intensity, i.e. the number of amplification cycles (Ct), is debated because of strong potential biases. We analyze a national database of tests performed on more than 2 million individuals between January and November 2020. Although we find Ct values to vary depending on the testing laboratory or the assay used, we detect strong significant trends with patient age, number of days after symptoms onset, or the state of the epidemic (the temporal reproduction number) at the time of the test. These results suggest that Ct values can be used to improve short-term predictions for epidemic surveillance.

7.
Preprint em Inglês | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-385252

RESUMO

Memory B cells play a fundamental role in host defenses against viruses, but to date, their role have been relatively unsettled in the context of SARS-CoV-2. We report here a longitudinal single-cell and repertoire profiling of the B cell response up to 6 months in mild and severe COVID-19 patients. Distinct SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific activated B cell clones fueled an early antibody-secreting cell burst as well as a durable synchronous germinal center response. While highly mutated memory B cells, including preexisting cross-reactive seasonal Betacoronavirus-specific clones, were recruited early in the response, neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific clones accumulated with time and largely contributed to the late remarkably stable memory B-cell pool. Highlighting germinal center maturation, these cells displayed clear accumulation of somatic mutations in their variable region genes over time. Overall, these findings demonstrate that an antigen-driven activation persisted and matured up to 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection and may provide long-term protection.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...