Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gut ; 73(4): 613-621, 2024 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38182137

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Contaminated duodenoscopes caused several hospital outbreaks. Despite efforts to reduce contamination rates, 15% of patient-ready duodenoscopes are still contaminated with gastrointestinal microorganisms. This study aimed to provide an overview of duodenoscope contamination over time, identify risk factors and study the effects of implemented interventions. DESIGN: Duodenoscope culture sets between March 2015 and June 2022 at a Dutch tertiary care centre were analysed. Contamination was defined as (1) the presence of microorganisms of oral or gastrointestinal origin (MGO) or (2) any other microorganism with ≥20 colony-forming units/20 mL (AM20). A logistic mixed effects model was used to identify risk factors and assess the effect of interventions, such as using duodenoscopes with disposable caps, replacing automated endoscope reprocessors (AER) and conducting audits in the endoscopy department. RESULTS: A total of 404 culture sets were analysed. The yearly contamination rate with MGO showed great variation, ranging from 14.3% to 47.5%. Contamination with AM20 increased up to 94.7% by 2022. For both MGO and AM20, the biopsy and suction channels were the most frequently contaminated duodenoscope components. The studied interventions, including audits, AER replacement and implementation of duodenoscopes with disposable caps, did not show a clear association with contamination rates. CONCLUSION: Duodenoscope contamination remains a significant problem, with high contamination rates despite several interventions. Reprocessing the biopsy and suction channels is especially challenging. Changes in the design of reusable duodenoscopes, such as enabling sterilisation or easily replaceable channels, are necessary to facilitate effective duodenoscope reprocessing and to eliminate the risk of duodenoscope-associated infections.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Duodenoscópios , Humanos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Óxido de Magnésio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Endoscopy ; 56(3): 198-204, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37848074

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current duodenoscope reprocessing protocols are insufficient to prevent contamination and require adaptations to prevent endoscopy-associated infections (EAIs). This study aimed to investigate the effect of a new endoscope cleaning brush on the contamination rate of ready-to-use duodenoscopes. METHODS: This retrospective before-and-after intervention study collected duodenoscope surveillance culture results from March 2018 to June 2022. Contamination was defined as ≥1 colony-forming unit of a microorganism of gut or oral origin (MGO). In December 2020, an endoscope cleaning brush with a sweeper design was introduced as an intervention in the manual cleaning of duodenoscopes. A logistic mixed-effects model was used to study the effects of this intervention. RESULTS: Data were collected from 176 culture sets before the new brush's introduction and 81 culture sets afterwards. Pre-introduction, culture sets positive with an MGO comprised 45.5% (95%CI 38.3%-52.8%; 80/176), decreasing to 17.3% (95%CI 10.6%-26.9%; 14/81) after implementation of the new brush. Compared with the former brush, duodenoscopes cleaned with the new brush had lower odds of contamination with MGOs (adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95%CI 0.11-0.58; P=0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Use of the new brush in manual cleaning reduced contamination with MGOs and is expected to prevent EAIs. These findings should be confirmed in future prospective randomized studies.


Assuntos
Duodenoscópios , Óxido de Magnésio , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Desinfecção/métodos , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal
3.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 9(1): 39, 2020 02 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087747

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neonatal Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteremia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In this study, we examined whether methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) transmission and genetic makeup contribute to the occurrence of neonatal S. aureus bacteremia. METHODS: A retrospective, single-centre study was performed. All patients were included who suffered from S. aureus bacteremia in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, between January 2011 and November 2017. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to characterize the S. aureus isolates, as was also done in comparison to reference genomes. Transmission was considered likely in case of genetically indistinguishable S. aureus isolates. RESULTS: Excluding coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), S. aureus was the most common cause of neonatal bacteremia. Twelve percent (n = 112) of all 926 positive blood cultures from neonates grew S. aureus. Based on core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), 12 clusters of genetically indistinguishable MSSA isolates were found, containing 33 isolates in total (2-4 isolates per cluster). In seven of these clusters, at least two of the identified MSSA isolates were collected within a time period of one month. Six virulence genes were present in 98-100% of all MSSA isolates. In comparison to S. aureus reference genomes, toxin genes encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin A (sea) and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (tsst-1) were present more often in the genomes of bacteremia isolates. CONCLUSION: Transmission of MSSA is a contributing factor to the occurrence of S. aureus bacteremia in neonates. Sea and tsst-1 might play a role in neonatal S. aureus bacteremia.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/transmissão , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/métodos , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Enterotoxinas/genética , Feminino , Genoma Bacteriano , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Masculino , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Superantígenos/genética , Virulência
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(9): 1023-1027, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31864807

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In this study, we explored the role of colonization in health care workers (HCWs) in transmission of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) to neonates at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: All available screening and clinical MSSA isolates, from the period March 2015 through April 2016, isolated from HCWs and neonates at the level IV NICU, were included. MSSA isolates were initially genotyped using spa typing, and for the most prevalent spa types, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed. RESULTS: From March 2015 through April 2016, 159 neonates and 115 HCWs were found positive for MSSA, and all isolates were typed by means of spa typing. Twenty-three spa types were found in both HCWs and neonates. Within the most prevalent spa types (t002, t015 and t2787), 4 WGS clusters of genetically indistinguishable MSSA isolates were found in which 4 HCWs and 35 neonates were involved. A total of 10 neonates included in the 4 WGS clusters suffered from bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that HCWs carried the same MSSA isolates as those found in neonates, and that HCWs might serve as a reservoir for transmission of MSSA to neonates. Ten neonates suffered from a bacteremia caused by a MSSA previously detected in a HCW.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma
5.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0194718, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29649257

RESUMO

Our human model of nasal colonization and eradication of S. aureus is limited by safety issues. As rhesus macaques are closely related to humans and natural hosts for S. aureus, we developed an experimental decolonization and inoculation protocol in these animals. Animals were screened for nasal carriage of S. aureus and 20 carriers were selected. Decolonization was attempted using nasal mupirocin (10 animals) or mupirocin plus trimethoprim/sulfadiazine intramuscularly (10 animals) both once daily for 5 days, and checked by follow-up cultures for 10 weeks. Intranasal inoculation was performed with S. aureus strain 8325-4 in culture-negative animals. 11/20 animals, of which 5 received mupirocin and 6 the combination treatment, became culture-negative for S. aureus for 10 weeks and these 11 animals were subsequently inoculated. Swabs were taken once a week for 5 weeks to test for the presence of the inoculated strain. In 3 animals, strain 8325-4 was cultured from the nose 1 week after inoculation, indicating short-term survival of this strain only, a finding similar to that previously found in our human model. These data demonstrate that rhesus macaques may constitute a relevant animal model to perform S. aureus eradication and inoculation studies with relatively limited invasive handling of the animals.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Macaca mulatta/microbiologia , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Masculino , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Nariz/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus , Sulfadiazina , Trimetoprima
6.
J Clin Virol ; 102: 95-100, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Correct identification of blood borne viral infections, such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is crucial in detection and follow up of infection in patients. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the DiaSorin LIAISON XL (LIAISON XL) for screening of HBV, HCV and HIV infection. In addition, we investigated the variability of the signal-to-cuttoff ratio (S/CO) of the LIAISON XL HIV Ag/Ab assay and it's predictive value in subsequent confirmation of HIV-1 infection. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 16,497 blood samples on which HBV, HCV and HIV screening was performed. We defined A) archived samples previously tested with an arbitrary result in the Abbott ARCHITECT i2000SR system; B) prospectively collected samples which were simultaneously tested on the LIAISON XL and ARCHITECT i2000SR; C) prospectively collected serum samples for HIV testing which were tested solely on the LIAISON XL. RESULTS: The agreements of HBV-, HCV-, and HIV markers between the two compared systems are remarkably high. Among the samples which were prospectively tested for HIV Ab/Ag on the LIASON XL, 229 (1.6%) were reactive of which 141 (61.6%) could be confirmed. Increasing the signal-to-cutoff value to 4 could increase the positive predictive value (PPV) to 88.1% without decreasing sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The LIAISON XL system proved to be an excellent system for diagnosing HBV, HCV, and HIV. Our data for the first time showed that increasing the HIV S/CO ratio was safe and increased the PPV for confirmed HIV infection in the tested population.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Hepatite B/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Imunoensaio/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Anticorpos Anti-HIV/sangue , Antígenos HIV/sangue , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/sangue , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/sangue , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes Sorológicos , Razão Sinal-Ruído
7.
PLoS One ; 7(11): e48896, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23155425

RESUMO

There is evidence that MRSA ST398 of animal origin is only capable of temporarily occupying the human nose, and it is therefore, often considered a poor human colonizer.We inoculated 16 healthy human volunteers with a mixture of the human MSSA strain 1036 (ST931, CC8) and the bovine MSSA strain 5062 (ST398, CC398), 7 weeks after a treatment with mupirocin and chlorhexidine-containing soap. Bacterial survival was studied by follow-up cultures over 21 days. The human strain 1036 was eliminated faster (median 14 days; range 2-21 days) than the bovine strain 5062 (median 21 days; range 7-21 days) but this difference was not significant (p = 0.065). The bacterial loads were significantly higher for the bovine strain on day 7 and day 21. 4/14 volunteers (28.6%) showed elimination of both strains within 21 days. Of the 10 remaining volunteers, 5 showed no differences in bacterial counts between both strains, and in the other 5 the ST398 strain far outnumbered the human S. aureus strain. Within the 21 days of follow-up, neither human strain 1036 nor bovine strain 5062 appeared to acquire or lose any mobile genetic elements. In conclusion, S. aureus ST398 strain 5062 is capable of adequately competing for a niche with a human strain and survives in the human nose for at least 21 days.


Assuntos
Nariz/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Adulto , Carga Bacteriana , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...