The Australian and New Zealand Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Survey, Calendar Year 2021: 50-Year Anniversary.

BACKGROUND: A cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) survey was undertaken in Australia and New Zealand for calendar year 2021. The survey involved pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The survey was conducted on the 50th anniversary of the first survey for both Australia and New Zealand in 1972; that initial survey being conducted by two of the current authors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: For 2021, there were 19,410 PMs (17,971 in 2017) sold in Australia for new implants and 2,282 (1,811 in 2017) sold in New Zealand. The number of new PM implants per million population was 755 for Australia (745 in 2017) and 446 for New Zealand (384 in 2017). Unlike previous recent surveys, the percentage of PM replacements compared to total sales in both Australia and New Zealand rose. Pulse generator types implanted were predominantly dual chamber; Australia 77% (73% in 2017) and New Zealand 70% (68% in 2017). There were 1,509 biventricular PMs implanted in Australia (1,247 in 2017) and 172 in New Zealand (118 in 2017). Transvenous pacing leads were >90% active fixation in the atrium and ventricle. There was an increase in ICD usage with Australia 4,519 new implants (4,212 in 2017) and New Zealand 449 (396 in 2017). New ICD implants per million population were 187 for Australia (175 in 2017) and 88 for New Zealand (90 in 2017). For the first time the survey included implantable event monitors with 6,933 being implanted in Australia. However, for proprietary reasons, survey figures for subcutaneous implantable defibrillators, leadless pacemakers and conduction system pacing have not been included. Both Australia and New Zealand have high PM and ICD implant numbers compared to the rest of the Asia Pacific region.

The Cardiac Pacemaker Clinic: Memories From a Bygone Era.

In 1963, soon after the first ventricular pacemakers were implanted at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, attempts were made to identify impending pacing failure, thus preventing sudden death in these very vulnerable patients. By 1970, patient numbers had increased, a formal regular pacemaker clinic was established, and guidelines and protocols developed. The clinic was staffed by a physician, a biomedical engineer and cardiac technicians. The unipolar, asynchronous, non-programmable pulse generators were powered by mercuric oxide/zinc batteries and implanted in the abdomen, using either transvenous or epimyocardial leads. Although, pulse generators were electively replaced at 3 years, most had already been replaced because of power source depletion, electronic failure or lead issues. Testing in all patients involved an electrocardiographic rhythm strip and electronic analysis of the stimulus artefact using a calibrated high-speed storage oscilloscope. Results were compared to previous studies and significant changes were interpreted as impending power source depletion. As a result of this testing, 97% of cases of impending power source depletion were detected prior to failure. These findings allowed testing each 4 months and for pulse generator life to be extended beyond three years. With ventricular triggered pulse generators, new testing procedures were designed. With time, visiting regional centres and clinical evaluation of new products became important functions of the clinic.

The Australian history of cardiac pacing: memories from a bygone era.

Although Dr Albert Hyman in New York is believed to have built the first cardiac pacemaker in 1932, he acknowledges Dr Mark Lidwell in Sydney, Australia as having not only built a pacemaker, but also successfully used it to resuscitate a newborn infant in or before 1929. Fully implantable pacemakers, however, were not possible until 1958, following the development of the silicon transistor. Within three years of that first implant, a pulse generator attached to epicardial leads was implanted at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. About the same time, an engineer in Sydney with intermittent complete heart block who had received epicardial leads and an external pulse generator proposed a simple sensing circuit, leading to the design of the first demand pacing system. By the mid 1960s, physicians were inserting transvenous leads in the right ventricle attached to pulse generators implanted in the anterior abdominal wall. In 1963, an Australian pacemaker company, Telectronics, was founded in Sydney. This innovative company-designed many of the features of transvenous leads and pulse generators we take for granted today. Australia also played a leading role in the design or early evaluation of the lithium power source, lead fixation, steroid elution, automatic anti-tachycardia pacing algorithms and the minute ventilation rate adaptive sensor. This manuscript describes the challenges and frustrations of those pioneers: physicians, surgeons and biomedical engineers.

Cardiac pacing: memories of a bygone era.

The first cardiac pacemaker implants occurred in the late 1950s and involved insertion of epicardial or epimyocardial leads and abdominal pulse generators. By the mid 1960s, cardiologists were making attempts to insert transvenous leads into the right ventricle. These early unipolar leads had large, polished, high polarization electrodes, no fixation device, and no lumen in which to place a stylet for lead positioning. The lead implantation procedures were usually long and the irradiation to both patient and operator excessive. Pulse generators were powered by zinc-mercury cells, which were large, unreliable, and prone to sudden output failure. Postoperative complications such as lead dislodgement, exit block, and premature power source failure were very common with most patients requiring further surgery within a year. Little has been written of this period and in particular the experiences of the operators, such that today's pacemaker implanters have virtually no knowledge of this bygone era. This historical report by four Australian cardiologists details the operative procedures and follow-up management of those original pacemaker recipients.

Effect of pravastatin compared with placebo initiated within 24 hours of onset of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina: the Pravastatin in Acute Coronary Treatment (PACT) trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of statin drugs after an acute coronary event is now well established, but the evidence for statin use in the early treatment of acute coronary events remains unclear. METHODS: We tested the effects of administering pravastatin within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms in patients with unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Patient recruitment of 10,000 with 1200 end points was planned, but the trial was stopped early. A total of 3408 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with pravastatin (1710 patients) or matching placebo (1698 patients). Treatment was continued for 4 weeks. The primary end point of the study was a composite of death, recurrence of myocardial infarction, or readmission to hospital for unstable angina within 30 days of random assignment. RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 199 of patients allocated to pravastatin (11.6%) and in 211 patients allocated to placebo (12.4%). A relative risk reduction of 6.4% favored allocation to pravastatin but was not statistically significant (95% CI, -13.2% to 27.6%). No adverse effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 20 to 40 mg of pravastatin can be safely administered within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms of an acute coronary event, with a favorable but not significant trend in outcome at 30 days compared with placebo.