Optimizing glenoid bone preservation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using augmented baseplates.

Background: As techniques and implants for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) evolve, a greater emphasis is being placed on preserving glenoid bone stock and optimizing shoulder biomechanics. Augmented baseplates preserve glenoid bone and improve shoulder range of motion by lateralizing the center of rotation of the glenosphere, while also reducing postoperative complications after rTSA. The technique for bone preservation with use of augmented baseplates in the absence of bone loss and the outcomes of a series of cases are contained in this report. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 37 patients with Walch type A1/Sirveaux E0 glenoids who underwent primary rTSA using a bone preserving technique with an augmented baseplate between January 2018 and January 2019 at a single site by a single surgeon. The primary outcome measures were range of motion, strength, and patient-reported clinical outcomes (pain and function rated on a visual analog scale; single assessment numeric evaluation; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score). Preoperative radiographs were analyzed for the presence of glenoid bone loss and postoperative radiographs were assessed for evidence of component loosening and scapular notching. A repeated measures design was used, and preoperative and postoperative comparisons were made using parametric t-tests. Results: At an average follow-up of 23.3 ± 6.3 months, there was a significant improvement in active forward flexion and abduction and nonsignificant improvement in external rotation. There was no radiographic evidence of glenoid notching in any of the patients and optimal glenoid inclination was observed. Patient-reported outcome scores after an average of 25.2 ± 10.0 months indicated a significant improvement in pain, function, and scores for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand assessments. There were no substantial postoperative radiographic findings, intra/postoperative complications, or revisions/reoperations. Conclusion: rTSA with augmented baseplates for glenoid bone preservation in patients with minimal or no bone loss is effective for preserving glenoid bone stock and significantly improves the range of motion and patient-reported outcomes after approximately 2 years.

Early Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures With Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scores Less Than 4.

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs) are the most common spinal fractures seen in patients with trauma. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) classification system is commonly used to help clinicians make more consistent and objective decisions in assessing the indications for surgical intervention in patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Patients with TLICS scores <4 are treated conservatively, but a percentage of them will have failed conservative treatment and require surgery at a later date. METHODS: All patients who received an orthopaedic consult between January 2016 and December 2020 were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. For patients meeting the study requirements, deidentified data were collected including demographics, diagnostics workup, and hospital course. Data analysis was conducted comparing length of stay, time between first consult and surgery, and time between surgery and discharge among each group. RESULTS: 1.4% of patients with a TLICS score <4 not treated surgically at initial hospital stay required surgery at a later date. Patients with a TLICS score <4 treated conservatively had a statistically significant shorter hospital stay compared with those treated surgically. However, when time between initial consult and surgery was factored into the total duration of hospital stay for those treated surgically, the duration was statistically equivalent to those treated nonsurgically. CONCLUSION: For patients with a TLICS score <4 with delayed mobilization after 3 days in the hospital or polytraumatic injuries, surgical stabilization at initial presentation can decrease the percentage of patients who fail conservative care and require delayed surgery. Patients treated surgically have a longer length of stay than those treated conservatively, but there is no difference in stay when time between consult and surgery was accounted for. In addition, initial surgery in patients with delayed mobilization can prevent long waits to surgery, while conservative measures are exhausted. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study.

Minimally invasive spine surgery as treatment for persistent infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Antibiotic resistant infectious spondylodiscitis (IS) can cause significant morbidity for patients. Open surgical techniques were previously the only option for patients who failed antibiotic therapy. However, advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques may provide a new alternative for some patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to identify studies that reported inflammatory [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] and functional outcomes [visual analog scale (VAS)] for patients with antibiotic resistant IS treated with either minimally invasive or open surgery. Searches were preformed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from January 2015 to June 2021. Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria. One study was a Level III evidence study and the other 13 included studies were Level IV. Results: The minimally invasive surgery group showed significantly lower post-operative CRP and VAS pain scores and significantly higher post-operative ESR levels than the open group. All studies included were measured by the Downs and Black tool for potential bias. Discussion: This study showed that minimally invasive surgery is efficacious in the treatment of antibiotic resistant IS. These outcomes support minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as an effective alternative to previous open surgery techniques in certain patients after failed trails of antibiotic therapy.