[Simultaneously monitoring end tidal CO2 and other parameters versus anesthesia management].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of end tidal CO2(ETCO2) combined with other techniques in anesthesia management. METHODS: Twenty two patients undergoing general anesthesia were monitored with electromyocardiogram (ECG), invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP), plethysmogram and capnography simultaneously. Ten patients undergoing epidural anesthesia and cervical plexus block were monitored with ETCO2. RESULTS: During general anesthesia the depth of general anesthesia, status of ventilation and the degree of muscle relaxation could be grossly evaluated by simultaneously monitoring ETCO2, capnography, plethysmogram, ECG and IABP. ETCO2 could also provide an objective standard for the assessment of respiratory function during spontaneous ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: ETCO2 combined with other monitoring techniques can increase the safety of anesthesia and the accuracy of anesthesia management.

[Application of rigid bronchoscopy in airway management after lobectomy of lung].

OBJECTIVE: Application of rigid bronchoscopy in airway management after lobectomy of lung was recommended, and its significance was discussed. METHODS: Bronchoscopies were performed in three patients scheduled for lobectomy of lung undergoing epidural plus general anesthesia. Each patient was examined two times. The first examination was done after anesthetic induction and intubation. The second was given at the end of operation. RESULTS: Rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia could clearly show the inner structures of trachea, bronchi and location of carcinoma. Under direct version, the secretion and sludged blood in the trachea and bronchi after lobectomy could be scavenged. CONCLUSION: It was suggested that with the use of bronchoscopy the complications including postoperative atelectasis and bronchial-pleural fistulization could be reduced.

Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of intravenous, epidural and intrathecal sufentanil analgesia as a supplement to general anaesthesia for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Sixty ASA Grade II-III patients, without clinical symptoms of ventricular dysfunction and scheduled for elective bifemoral grafting for abdominal aneurysms, were allocated randomly to three equal groups to receive 150 micrograms sufentanil intravenously, epidurally or intrathecally. All patients received midazolam, vecuronium and nitrous oxide. Except for right ventricular stroke work index and pulmonary vascular resistance, all haemodynamic measurements decreased after sufentanil injection, but to the greatest extent after intravenous injection. Response to abdominal incision reversed the haemodynamic changes, although this was not accompanied by an increase in heart rate and coronary perfusion pressure after intrathecal injection. Four patients given intravenous, and four patients given epidural sufentanil required additional sufentanil after abdominal incision. Despite the changes in systemic vascular resistance and the concordant alterations in cardiac index after aortic cross-clamping and revascularization, intrathecal sufentanil provided more stability in heart rate than intravenous or epidural sufentanil. In conclusion, intrathecal sufentanil produced the most stable heart rate. Two patients in the intrathecal group developed spinal headaches post-operatively.

A haemodynamic comparison of epidural versus intrathecal sufentanil to supplement general anaesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

The present study was designed to evaluate the influence of epidural sufentanil (ES) and intrathecal sufentanil (IS) on the peri-operative haemodynamic responses during abdominal aortic surgery. Twenty-four ASA Grade II patients without clinical symptoms of coronary artery disease received, randomly, epidural (n = 12) or intrathecal (n = 12) sufentanil combined with light general anaesthesia for elective bifemoral grafting for aorto-iliac occlusive disease. The IS group contained significantly more hypertensive patients than the ES group. This resulted in a significantly higher systolic and mean blood pressure, which remained constant from the start to the end of the study. Following a single bolus injection of 150 micrograms of sufentanil epidurally or intrathecally, there was a significant decrease in heart rate (HR), systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and coronary perfusion pressure in both groups. This suggests that IS and ES must be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular disease. The abdominal incision restored the haemodynamic changes produced by sufentanil administration, but these did not exceed pre-sufentanil values. There were no significant changes in filling pressure, cardiac index (CI) and left ventricular work after aortic cross-clamping in the two groups. Revascularization produced significant differences in HR, SVR and CI in both groups in comparison with the pre-declamping period. Notable was the maintenance of systemic blood pressure following revascularization due to preservation of sympathetic activity. It was concluded that both epidural and intrathecal sufentanil produce comparable and stable haemodynamics in this category of patients.

A postoperative analysis of the patient's view of anaesthesia in a Netherlands' teaching hospital.

A postoperative questionnaire was used in 129 patients who had undergone a wide range of surgical procedures in order to investigate their personal experience of anaesthesia. The most frequent complaints were of feeling cold on waking up, sore throat, vomiting and muscle pains, all of which are capable of reduction by a change in anaesthetic technique. The total number of patients who had one or more complaints was 107 (82.9%). More than a third of the patients were afraid of the anaesthetic, as distinct from the operation. Most had received a pre-operative visit from the anaesthetist which was greatly appreciated. A few patients believed they could have been better informed of possible sequelae. More than 30% were not visited by the surgeon before the operation. A routine postoperative interview, using a preformulated questionnaire, is a good way to assess and maintain a high quality of anaesthesia.

Successful treatment with CPAP of two infants with bronchomalacia.

Two children with severe bronchial collapse secondary to bronchomalacia improved dramatically after institution of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Treatment was discontinued after 14 weeks without reappearance of symptoms. Repeated bronchoscopy revealed a diminution in the bronchial collapsibility. It is suggested that CPAP should be given if generalised bronchomalacia is present to tide the children over a bad period while the bronchus is becoming more stable.

The importance of monitoring in anesthesia.

A plea is made for continuous electronic monitoring of every patient undergoing an anesthetic. Such monitoring is far superior to clinical observation by means of the natural sensors. A continuous record of the vital phenomena is indispensable. Routine monitoring of the following is advised: ECG, heart rate, capnogram, plethysmogram, temperature, oxygen percentage and indirect blood pressure. Big operations demand central venous pressure and direct blood pressure monitoring, in addition. In the Institute of Anesthesiology in Utrecht all electronic monitors are built into a single unit which is used during every anesthetic. Capnography it dealt with in some detail and its value as a universal monitor demonstrated. The routine use of electronic monitors improves the quality of anesthesia and increases the safety of the patient.

Safe anesthesia: some general considerations.

Most of the articles on safety in anesthesia take the mortality as the criterion. This is fallacious. The anesthetist's area of responsibility must be clearly defined before his contribution to any given mortality can be assessed. The development of the field of anesthesiology has extended this area enormously. As a result, the techniques employed and the results obtained need to be reviewed and reconsidered. Outdated attitudes must be resolutely abandoned, particularly with regard to monitoring. The use of a coding system for anesthetic complications helps towards an objective assessment of the degree of safety achieved. The results obtained by this means in the Institute of Anesthesiology in Utrecht are reported.