The characteristics of quality of life impairment in adult growth hormone (GH)-deficient survivors of cancer and their response to GH replacement therapy.

We studied 50 (27 women and 23 men) GH-deficient (GHD) cancer survivors and 47 (24 women and 23 men) GHD patients with pituitary pathologies. All GHD patients were considered for GH replacement on the basis of subjectively poor quality of life (QOL). Primary outcome measures were scores of QOL instruments psychological general well-being schedule (PGWB) and assessment of GH deficiency in adults (AGHDA) at baseline and early (6-13 months) and long-term (24-77 months) treatment follow-up. Of secondary interest were six PGWB domains. Linear mixed effect regression was used to model each QOL outcome. The groups differed with respect to three covariates: age, gender, and body mass index. These variables were included in all fitted models. Baseline scores for PGWB and AGHDA were not different between groups. Ranking of PGWB domains were similar between groups at baseline (lowest domain, vitality). The pattern of change in mean scores for all outcome measures from baseline did not differ between groups (P = 0.86). All QOL variables improved significantly with treatment [estimated mean change +/- se: PGWB, 16.2 +/- 1.7; AGHDA, -6.2 +/- 0.6; PGWB domains (transformed percentage scales): anxiety, 12.4 +/- 1.7; depression, 14.1 +/- 2.1; health, 12.4 +/- 1.7; self-control, 11.3 +/- 2.0; well-being, 15.2 +/- 1.7; vitality, 22.5 +/- 2.0 (vitality, greatest change)]. There was no evidence of group difference in early follow-up or long-term follow-up means for any outcome variable. The QOL in adult GHD cancer survivors was comparable to that in GHD adults with pituitary pathologies and improved with GH replacement in a similar manner. We conclude that QOL impairment in adult GHD cancer survivors appears mainly related to GHD rather than cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Low-dose GH replacement improves the adverse lipid profile associated with the adult GH deficiency syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is associated with an adverse lipid profile. The majority of previous studies of GH replacement have used supraphysiological doses and reported favourable changes in the lipid profile. Whether this beneficial effect is the result of pharmacological GH therapy, or occurs in response to low-dose GH replacement aimed at normalization of the serum IGF-I, has not been fully elucidated. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 67 patients with GH deficiency using a low-dose individualized GH replacement regimen. GH was commenced at a dose of 0.27 mg/day and the GH dose titrated until the serum IGF-I was normalized. Serum lipids were assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: A reduction in total cholesterol (TC) was observed at 12 (6.01 vs. 5.77 mmol, P = 0.04) and 24 months (6.01 vs. 5.56, P = 0.09). The reduction in LDLC failed to reach significance at 12 months (3.97 vs. 3.8, P = 0.09), but was significant at 24 months (3.97 vs. 3.50, P = 0.02). Levels of HDLC did not change significantly at 12 or 24 months. Significant improvements in the TC/HDLC ratio were observed at both 12 (5.68 vs. 5.29, P = 0.01) and 24 months (5.68 vs. 4.86, P = 0.007). A significant fall in triglycerides (TG) was present at 12 months (2.07 vs. 1.83, P = 0.01), and was maintained at 24 months, but was no longer significant (2.07 vs. 1.89, P = 0.28). At 12 months there was no correlation between improvements in lipid parameters and either the change in IGF-I SD score or the GH dose. Using multivariate analysis the change in TC, LDLC and the TC/HDLC ratio with 12 months GH replacement were determined by the baseline TC, LDLC and TC/HDLC levels (R2 = 0.18, P = 0.004; R2 = 0.20, P = 0.006; and R2 = 0.33, P < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose individualized GH replacement aimed at normalization of the serum IGF-I is associated with significant improvements in TC, LDLC, TGs and the TC/HDLC ratio. The greatest improvements are observed in patients with the most adverse lipid profiles at baseline. Improvements are independent of changes in the IGF-I SDS and GH dose.

Spinal irradiation impairs the osteo-anabolic effects of low-dose GH replacement in adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Both adult- and childhood-onset GH-deficient adults are prone to osteopenia. Studies of GH replacement have, for the most part, demonstrated increases in bone mineral density (BMD). Previous studies have, however, used GH doses in excess of those currently used in low-dose titration regimens aimed at normalizing the serum IGF-I level. Furthermore, the effect of GH on the lumbar spine that has been irradiated during treatment of childhood cancer is unknown. PATIENTS: Thirty-two adult patients with childhood-onset GH deficiency were subdivided according to whether or not they had received spinal irradiation in childhood. The cohort in whom the spine had not been irradiated was comprised of 17 patients (seven male, 10 female), median age 29.8 years (range 20.6--40.8), the median age at primary pathological diagnosis being 9 years (range 4--16). The cohort who received spinal irradiation was composed of 15 patients (seven male, eight female), median age 22.9 years (range 16.5--40.3), with a median age at craniospinal irradiation of 9 years (range 2--16). MEASUREMENTS: At baseline, BMD was assessed at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA, and at the ultradistal and distal radius by SXA. The patients were then commenced on GH replacement, titrating the dose at 4--6-weekly intervals to normalize the serum IGF-I level. BMD scans were reassessed following at least 1 year of GH replacement therapy. The mean duration of GH therapy was 1.68 plus minus 0.52 years. RESULTS: BMD was significantly reduced, compared to the reference data, at all four sites measured in both the spinally irradiated and unirradiated groups. No significant difference was observed between the subgroups with respect to lumbar spine BMD (P = 0.64). In the cohort who did not receive spinal irradiation, an increase in BMD of 3.5% above baseline was observed at the lumbar spine (P = 0.018), 13/17 patients showing a positive increment in lumbar spine BMD. No significant changes in BMD were observed at any other site within this cohort, or at any site in the patients who received spinal irradiation. A significantly greater change in lumbar spine BMD was observed in the unirradiated spine cohort compared with the spinally irradiated cohort (P = 0.018). No differences in response were demonstrated at the other sites studied between the two subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated an increase in lumbar spine BMD with long-term (mean 1.78 +/- 0.55 years) GH therapy in adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency, who have not received spinal irradiation, when GH was administered by a titration regimen aimed at normalizing the serum IGF-I level. No improvements were observed at the femoral neck, ultradistal or distal radius. Patients who had received spinal irradiation during childhood did not present with a reduction in spinal BMD in excess of that observed in the nonirradiated cohort. The spinally irradiated group were, however, resistant to the osteo-anabolic effects of GH, which we propose reflects the capacity of radiation-induced damage to suppress the skeletal response.

Influences on quality of life in GH deficient adults and their effect on response to treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Studies of the effect of GH on quality of life (QOL) in growth hormone deficient (GHD) adults have reported conflicting results. Recently, however, we have demonstrated that by selecting only those patients with impaired QOL the efficacy of GH replacement on QOL can be greatly improved. The improvement in QOL was observed to correlate significantly with that recorded before commencing GH therapy. This study aims to assess if demographic variables affect QOL in untreated GHD adults or the improvement in QOL following GH therapy. DESIGN: An open study of GH replacement, initiating treatment with a dose of 0.8 IU/day and titrating the dose by 0.4 IU increments to normalize the IGF-I SDS between - 2.0 and + 2.0 SD of the age related normal range. PATIENTS: 65 severely GHD patients (peak GH < 9 mU/l to provocative testing), mean age 38.7 (range 17-72) years. Inclusion criterion was that of subjectively poor quality of life on clinical interview. MEASUREMENTS: Blood was taken for insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I). The Psychological General Well-Being Schedule (PGWB) and Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency Assessment (AGHDA) self-rating questionnaires were used to assess quality of life at baseline, three and eight months after commencing GH. RESULTS: The patients were subgrouped on the basis of gender, age of onset of GHD, pathology and presence of additional pituitary hormone deficits. The cohort consisted of 40 females and 25 males, 45 of adult-onset (AO) and 20 of childhood-onset (CO). GH deficiency resulted from a hypothalamo-pituitary pathology, or treatment thereof, in 36 patients and as a result of cranial irradiation for a primary brain tumour or prophylaxis in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in 29 patients. Isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) was present in 25 patients, and 32 patients were demonstrated to have at least two additional pituitary hormone deficits (MPHD). No significant difference was detected between baseline PGWB scores of the subgroups. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed the age of onset of GHD to be a significant determinant of both the baseline PGWB (P = 0.05) and AGHDA (P = 0.025) scores, AO patients perceiving the greater distress. A significant improvement, from baseline, in both QOL scores was observed in all subgroups at three months, and in all subgroups at eight months except IGHD, where a trend towards improvement in the AGHDA score was observed but failed to reach significance. The mean improvement in the PGWB following GH therapy was not significantly different between subgroups. Multiple linear regression analysis confirmed baseline PGWB and AGHDA scores to be the most important variable in prediction of the level of improvement in respective scores following GH therapy. Age of onset was also observed to be a significant determinant of the PGWB scores following GH therapy (P = 0.02), the CO cohort experiencing the greater improvement. A similar relationship between age of onset and AGHDA scores was not observed (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline QOL as assessed by self-rating questionnaires is influenced by the age of onset of the GH deficiency, adult onset patients expressing the greater distress. Improvements in QOL scores are influenced by both baseline score and to a lesser extent the age of onset of GHD, the greater improvement being observed in childhood onset patients. The degree of improvement was observed to be independent of gender, pathology and number of pituitary hormone deficits. In a cohort selected by subjectively impaired QOL, we have demonstrated childhood onset GHD patients perceive themselves to have less impairment of QOL pretreatment. In contrast to previous data in unselected cohorts, however, we have shown that those childhood onset GHD patients in whom QOL is significantly reduced, show a capacity for improvement that is equal to, if not greater, than that seen in adult onset-GHD patients.