Characteristics of nursing studies in diabetes research published over three decades in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland: a narrative review of the literature.

Similarities and differences across borders of Nordic countries constitute a suitable context for investigating and discussing factors related to the development of diabetes nursing research over the last three decades. The present study reviewed the entire body of contemporary diabetes nursing research literature originating in four Nordic countries: Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Iceland. Our aims were (i) to catalogue and characterise trends in research designs and research areas of these studies published over time and (ii) to describe how research involving nurses in Nordic countries has contributed to diabetes research overall. The larger goal of our analyses was to produce a comprehensive picture of this research in order to guide future studies in the field. We conducted a narrative literature review by systematically searching Medline, Medline in process, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases. These searches were limited to studies published between 1979 and 2009 that had an abstract available in English or a Nordic language. Two researchers independently selected studies for analysis, leading to the inclusion of 164 relevant publications for analysis. In summary, Nordic nurse researchers have contributed to the development of new knowledge in self-management of diabetes in childhood, adolescence and adulthood, and to some extent also in the treatment and care of diabetes foot ulcers. Future research may benefit from (i) larger nurse-led research programmes organised in networks in order to share knowledge and expertise across national groups and borders, (ii) more multidisciplinary collaborations in order to promote patient-centred care and (iii) further research directed towards improving the dissemination and implementation of research findings. Using complex intervention designs and a mix of research methods will enrich the research.

Check your health validity and reliability of a measure of health and burden of diabetes.

Check Your Health was constructed as four-two-sided vertical thermometers (0-100) measuring physical and emotional health, social well-being and quality of life today and before onset of diabetes. Burden of diabetes was calculated as the difference between the two scores (today and before onset of diabetes). The aim was to examine concurrent and discriminant validity and reliability of Check Your Health in a convenience sample of 180 people with diabetes, who visited the diabetes clinic during a 3-month period. A randomly selected subsample of 43 of the 180 patients responded to the questionnaire twice (test-retest). Besides Check Your Health, three additional questionnaires were mailed to the patients, the EVGFP scale (EVGFP stands for Excellent-Very good-Good-Fair-Poor health) for measuring concurrent validity, the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (Swe-DES-23) and an attitude measure, Semantic Differential in Diabetes (SDD) for calculation of discriminant validity. There was significant agreement between Check Your Health and the five EVGFP health groups. The instrument discriminated well between patients with and without late diabetic complications. The measure on burden of diabetes showed that the higher the burden of diabetes, the lower the quality of life. The same pattern was found for both Swe-DES 23 and SDD; the higher the burden, the lower the sense of empowerment and the lower the burden, the more positive the attitudes towards diabetes. Check Your Health showed good stability (0.88-0.68). The results indicate that Check Your Health can be used as an acceptable and sufficiently accurate method for detecting health distress in people with diabetes.

Clarifying responsibility for self-management of diabetes in adolescents using insulin pumps--a qualitative study.

AIM: To gain insight into and generate theoretical knowledge about the processes involved when insulin pump-treated adolescents take or miss taking their bolus doses. BACKGROUND: Insulin pump treatment is considered the most physiological way to imitate the healthy body's insulin profile in adolescents with diabetes. Despite insulin pump treatment, it is hard to maintain near-normal glucose control in adolescents; one reason for this is missed bolus doses with meals. METHOD: In this qualitative interview study, the grounded theory method was chosen as a model for the collection and analysis of data. Twelve adolescents (five boys and seven girls, mean age: 14·4 years, range: 12-19 years) from different Swedish paediatric diabetes clinics, four parents and one paediatric diabetes nurse were interviewed during 2008 and 2009. Two adolescents and two parents were re-interviewed after approximately 10 months. Data from clinical visits and diabetes camps were used to verify emerging categories. FINDINGS: Responsibility in the context of taking or missing bolus doses emerged as the core category. It is elaborated and explained through three subcategories: distribution of responsibility, transfer of responsibility and clarification of responsibility. The findings describe the need to clarify the responsibility for diabetes self-management in continuous negotiations between adolescents and parents to avoid missed doses. CONCLUSION: Negotiations to clarify the responsibility for diabetes self-management must be a continuous process between adolescents and parents. Diabetes care teams can facilitate and encourage these negotiations.

Reasons for missed meal-time insulin boluses from the perspective of adolescents using insulin pumps: 'lost focus'.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reasons for missed bolus doses and strategies for avoiding this among adolescents using insulin pumps. METHODS: The grounded theory method was chosen as a model for the collection and analysis of data. Data were collected through interviews with 12 adolescents treated with an insulin pump (5 males and 7 females, mean age 14.4 yr) from different Swedish pediatric diabetes clinics. All interviews were tape-recorded and immediately transcribed. RESULTS: The core category 'lost focus' emerged as representing the main reason for missed bolus doses. Identified subcategories were delayed lost focus, directly lost focus, and totally lost focus. There was a risk of delayed lost focus when the adolescent used postprandial bolusing. Focus could also be lost directly in connection with the start of the meal. Totally lost focus could occur when the adolescent perceived the impact of diabetes as too high or tried to neglect that he or she had it. The category 'agreements about reminders' appeared to be the main strategy for avoiding missed bolus doses; subcategories were personal reminders and technical reminders. The adolescent needed to be involved in these agreements; otherwise, the reminding could be seen as nagging and did not work. CONCLUSION: The results may help diabetes care teams understand the circumstances in which adolescents miss their bolus doses. This understanding may make it easier to discuss missed doses and strategies for avoiding this with adolescents and support negotiations over agreements about reminders between them and their parents.

Outcome of foot examinations in Tanzanian and Swedish diabetic patients, a comparative study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to present the outcome of clinical nurse performed foot examinations in a group of Tanzanian diabetic patients and make comparisons with matched Swedish patients. BACKGROUND: Nurses working with diabetic patients in any country need to be familiar with foot problems in diabetic patients to educate patients about foot care. DESIGN: A comparative study examining diabetic patients in Tanzania and Sweden with a quantitative approach. METHOD: One hundred and forty-five diabetic patients in each country were examined. They were matched in gender and age. All patients responded verbally to questions about individual foot-care and underwent clinical foot examination concerning existing foot lesions, sensitivity testing using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (5.07) and, vibratory perception using a tuning fork (128 Hz). RESULTS: The Tanzanians had more reported foot problems than the Swedes. The latter reported problems due to poorly fitting footwear whilst the Tanzanians reported pain issues of the feet irrespective of footwear. In the Tanzanian group 37 patients presented with peripheral neuropathy (PN), 13 with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and six had both PN and PVD. In the Swedish group of patients four had PN, three PVD, but none had both PN and PVD. Only 20 Tanzanians reported carrying out self-inspections of their feet, while 103 Swedes reported doing so. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse performed foot examinations showed that the Tanzanian diabetic patients in this study had poorer foot status than the Swedish study sample. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Knowledge about foot problems in diabetic patients worldwide will hopefully improve education about self foot-care and therefore decrease incidence of foot lesions and other foot problems in this cohort.

Does patient education facilitate diabetic patients' possibilities to reach national treatment targets? A national survey in Swedish primary healthcare.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how patient education is arranged in Swedish primary healthcare (PHC) and to assess whether the type of patient education and individual goal setting have an impact on diabetic patients' possibilities of reaching national treatment targets. DESIGN: A Swedish national survey. SETTING: Swedish PHC. SUBJECTS: Data from 485 primary healthcare centres (PHCCs) and 91,637 diabetic patients reported by the PHCCs to the National Diabetes Register in 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Description of how patient education is arranged, HbA(1c), body mass index, cholesterol, blood pressure, and physical activity. RESULTS: Of the PHCCs that reported how they performed the individual counselling, 50% reported checklist-driven counselling and 8% individualized counselling based on patients' needs. A total of 105 PHCCs reported that they arranged group education. Of these, 67% used pre-planned programmes and 9% individualized the programme to the patients' needs. The majority of PHCCs (96%) reported that they set individual goals (HbA(1c), blood pressure, lipids, and lifestyle). A minority of the PHCCs (27%) reported that the patients were involved in the final decision concerning their goals. Individual goal-setting facilitated patients' possibilities of reaching treatment targets. Goal-setting, list size of PHCCs, and personnel resources explained a variance of 2.1-5.7%. Neither individual counselling (checklist-driven or individualized to patients' needs) nor group education had an impact on patients' possibilities of reaching the targets. CONCLUSION: The current study indicates that improvement is needed in patient education in PHC to facilitate diabetic patients' possibilities of reaching national treatment targets.

Missed bolus doses: devastating for metabolic control in CSII-treated adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the management of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes including their administration of bolus doses and to study relationships between insulin omission and metabolic control, body mass index, daily frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and bolus doses, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), the burden of diabetes and treatment satisfaction. METHODS: Ninety CSII-treated (> or =6 months) adolescents aged 12-18 yr, from four diabetes clinics in Sweden, participated in the study. The adolescents recorded their meal intake the previous day, which was compared with downloaded pump data, and the frequency of missed boluses was stated. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and diabetes-related data were recorded. HRQOL and treatment satisfaction were measured with questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty-eight per cent of the adolescents had missed >15% of the doses the previous day, those had higher HbA1c (7.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 7.0 +/- 1.2%, p = 0.001), took fewer daily boluses (3.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.7, p < 0.001) and SMBG (2.4 +/- 1.8 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.8, p = 0.003), were less satisfied with their treatment (4.8 vs. 5.3, scale 0-6, p = 0.029) and perceived the medical treatment more negatively (72.1 vs. 79.7, scale 0-100, p = 0.029). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the variations in HbA1c could be explained by the frequency of bolus doses (p = 0.013) and SMBG per day (p < 0.0001) adjusted for duration and age (r(2) = 0.339, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Insulin omission was common. Those who missed doses were less satisfied and perceived more impact with the treatment. The frequencies of daily boluses and SMBG were associated with metabolic control. Diabetes teams need strategies to guide adolescents on how to avoid insulin omission.

Type 2 diabetic patients' experiences of two different educational approaches--a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to explore patients' experiences of participating in an empowerment group education programme or receiving individual counselling. METHOD: In total, 28 patients from seven primary care centres were interviewed. Of these, 14 had received individual counselling and the remaining 14 had also participated in 4-5 empowerment group sessions. The semi-structured interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: Three main categories crystallized from the interviews: (I) relationships, (II) learning and (III) controlling the disease. The relationships in the individual counselling seemed vertical, characterized by one-way communication with care providers acting as superiors and patients as subordinates. The relationships in the empowerment group appeared to be horizontal, characterized by trust and mutual communication. Those who had received individual counselling talked about learning by compliance--care providers acted as superiors, giving advice they expected the patients to follow. In the empowerment groups the patients talked more about participatory learning, whereby the facilitators and patients shared their knowledge and experiences. Controlling the disease could be labelled external in individual counselling, which made it difficult for patients to take responsibility for and control of their diabetes self-care. On the contrary, the patients in the empowerment group achieved the insight that diabetes is a serious disease but can be influenced, which contributed to their experience of self-control. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that vertical relationships, learning by compliance and external control seem to limit patients' ability to take responsibility for their disease, while horizontal relationships, participatory learning and self-control may contribute to strengthening patients' ability to influence and be actively involved in their own care.

Psychometric properties of the Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (Swe-DES-23). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A convenience sample of 195 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes completed the Swe-DES-23 questionnaire. To establish discriminant validity, Swe-DES subscales were compared with the Semantic Differential in Diabetes scale (SDD) and a general health scale (EVGFP). Construct validity was tested using factor analyses. To determine unidimensionality of the subscales, inter-item correlations were calculated. Internal consistency was tested by the use of the Crohnbach-alpha coefficient. RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in four factors (empowerment subscales) with eigenvalues >1.0, explaining 60% of the variance. The four empowerment subscales: goal achievement, self-awareness, stress management and readiness to change showed Crohnbach-alpha values ranging from 0.68 to 0.91. Patients with good self-reported health and low burden of diabetes scored significantly higher on almost all empowerment subscales. Only weak correlations were found between metabolic control and the empowerment subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The SWE-DES-23 scale had acceptable validity and reliability and, thus, could be a suitable tool in evaluating empowerment-based education programmes. Further testing is needed to shorten the questionnaire.

Patient education in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of empowerment group education on type 2 diabetes patients' confidence in diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy, satisfaction with daily life, BMI and glycaemic control compared with the impact of routine diabetes care on the same factors at a 1-year follow-up. In this randomized controlled trial, conducted at 7 primary care centres in central Sweden, 101 patients were randomly assigned either to empowerment group education (intervention group) or to routine diabetes care (control group). Out of these, 42 patients in the intervention group and 46 in the control group completed the 1-year follow-up. Before the intervention and at the 1-year follow-up, the patients answered a 27-item questionnaire, and weight, BMI and HbA1c were measured. The questionnaire comprised three domains: confidence in diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy and satisfaction with daily life. At 1-year follow-up, the level of confidence in diabetes knowledge was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in self-efficacy, satisfaction with daily life, BMI and HbA1c between the intervention and control group. The empowerment group education did improve patients' confidence in diabetes knowledge with maintained glycaemic control despite the progressive nature of the disease.

Treatment with CSII in two infants with neonatal diabetes mellitus.

This article reports the case studies of two children with neonatal onset of diabetes who were treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) from within 4 d to 3 wk of the diagnosis. The aim was to describe diabetes-related and insulin-pump-specific data in relation to growth and various feeding patterns when using CSII in infants with diabetes during their first year of life. The two children's medical records were scrutinized. The results showed that both children had good metabolic control [median hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.3 and 5.7%, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, reference: 3.4-5.0%. Compared with the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) HbA1c units, Swedish units give approximately 1% point lower results]. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis have been demonstrated. The children had normal growth patterns, as they followed a normal feeding regime for their age. The meal doses of insulin were given over 12 min to 3 h. The children had diluted Humalog((R)) insulin 10 U/mL (Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN, USA) in their pumps. Different types of insulin pumps were used, namely, the Minimed 507C and 508 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and a Disetronic H-tron V100 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The children used different types of infusion sets. Neither family reported any technical problems with their pump system. CSII was an effective and safe treatment for the two children suffering from neonatal diabetes. This offers an alternative for other infants with a similar diagnosis.

Competence of newly-graduated nurses--a comparison of the perceptions of qualified nurses and students.

AIM: This paper reports a study that compares opinions of final year nursing students, rating their own competence, with the opinions of experienced nurses on the competence of newly-graduated nurses. BACKGROUND: The transition of nursing preparation into higher education is regarded as positive, although it has led to differences in opinion about the competence of newly-graduated nurses and their readiness to enter the nursing profession. There are studies showing that newly-graduated nurses perceive themselves as holistically focused, professional practitioners, while other nurses are concerned that newly-graduated nurses do not have necessary skills. METHODS: A convenience sample of 106 nursing students in the final week of their course and 136 nurses who had experience of supervising nursing students completed a questionnaire. The data were collected in 2002. RESULTS: Own competence, in the form of ability to perform nursing care, was rated by nursing students to be good or strongly developed in most of the investigated areas of nursing care. Experienced nurses also estimated newly-graduated nurses' competence to be good or strongly developed, although to a lesser extent. Nurses qualified within the previous 5 years rated newly-graduated nurses' competence to be higher in comparison with those with less recent education. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to broaden our understanding of why some areas of nursing care, such as ethical awareness, were rated very highly, while others, like informing and teaching of co-workers and planning and prioritizing interventions had the lowest rating.

Implementing empowerment group education in diabetes.

The overall aim was to gain insight into and understand how physicians and nurses view the implementation of empowerment group education (EGE) in diabetes. Prior to the study the physicians and nurses attended a 2-day empowerment workshop. Further, they had implemented the empowerment approach in two groups of patients with type II diabetes. Three to 9 months later they (five physicians and 11 nurses from six family practices) participated in focus group interviews to evaluate the implementation of the EGE. The interviews were audio-taped, transcribed and analysed using the constant comparative method. The main result showed a conflict in roles. The physicians and nurses knew their role in the traditional approach but not with respect to the empowerment approach, which they needed to grow into. At the same time as they started a new way of working, their role had changed from being an expert to being a facilitator. As experts they felt secure; as facilitators they needed support in their educational process. To implement EGE they required support both from the family practice and from a supervisor in direct connection with the EGE.

Diabetes self-care and educational needs in Tanzanian and Swedish diabetic patients: a cross-cultural study.

The aim was to compare self-care and perceived educational needs in adult Tanzanian and Swedish diabetic patients. One hundred and fifty Tanzanians were matched with Swedes (n=150). All 300 patients filled in questionnaires about their self-care and educational needs. The comparison indicated the Tanzanians were almost as satisfied with their self-care as the Swedes, but Tanzanians were dissatisfied with the lack of drugs and wanted more diabetes education while the Swedes were more dissatisfied with their own self-care behaviour. None of theTanzanians monitored their own blood glucose, whereas half the patients in the Swedish group did so weekly or monthly. The findings suggest that diabetes education in Tanzania should concentrate more on basic diabetes knowledge. In Sweden, however, the main points to be stressed should be life style and psychology.

Self-reported health and glycaemic control in Tanzanian and Swedish diabetic patients.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To investigate self-reported health in adult Tanzanian and Swedish diabetic patients in relation to the general population in the two countries and to investigate whether diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control also rated their self-reported health to be impaired. DESIGN/METHODS: The study design was cross-sectional and comparative. One hundred and fifty Tanzanian patients were age- and gender-matched with Swedish diabetic patients. Self-reported health was measured using the generic SF-36 health questionnaire, measuring eight different health domains. Glycaemic control was measured by testing glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). RESULTS: The main results were that Tanzanian diabetic patients had poorer health in comparison with general Tanzanian population living in the same geographical area. In contrast, diabetic patients in Sweden did not markedly differ from the Swedish general population. Furthermore, Tanzanian patients had poorer glycaemic control. In both countries poor glycaemic control did not associate with impaired self-reported health, with one exception. Tanzanian patients with unsatisfactory or poor glycaemic control had significantly poorer reported health in the mental health domain. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that patients' health should be assessed using a specific health measure in addition to general medical measures.