Apheresis and transplant of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) from allogeneic donors of age above 60 years.

Over the immediate past 4 years, our program has collected hematopoietic progenitor cells by apheresis from 48 individuals aged 61 and over (range 61-71 years of age). We have retrospectively analyzed the collection and transplant results associated with employing these donors, and have compared them with 175 donors aged 60 or less who were collected during the same time period. We have found no significant difference in venous access (P = 0.208), rate of post-transplant engraftment of neutrophils (P = 0.117) and platelets (P = 0.692), or in rate and grade of acute GVHD (P = 0.806). However, we have found that these older donors have a significantly lower mobilization of CD34 + cells as reflected in lower absolute counts of circulating CD34 + cells pre-apheresis (P = 0.016). This, in turn, results in lower CD34 + cell yields in apheresis products (P < 0.001), trending towards requiring more apheresis procedures (22.9 vs 13.7%, P = 0.095) to collect sufficient CD34 + cells for transplantation. We conclude that it is practical when necessary to employ donors aged 60 and above, as well as safe for both donor and intended recipient. However, concern over reduced CD34 + cell mobilization may be sufficient grounds to seek younger donors when possible.

Simultaneous administration of G-CSF and GM-CSF for re-mobilization in patients with inadequate initial progenitor cell collections for autologous transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A proportion of candidates for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous PBPC support (HDC-PBPCS) will not provide an adequate PBPC yield from their first mobilization. The value of re-mobilization and the best regimen for re-mobilization in these patients is unclear. METHODS: In 23 patients who failed to provide > or = 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after their first mobilization, PBPC were re-mobilized using a regimen of simultaneous administration of G-CSF and GM-CSF (10 microg/kg/day each) with leukaphereses (LP) starting Day 4 or 5 of CSF administration. Yields of WBC/kg, MNC/kg and CD34+ cells/kg/L of processed blood were compared between the first and second mobilization in each patient. The ability of the combined yield from the two mobilizations to achieve the desired threshold PBPC yield and the tolerability of the re-mobilization were determined. RESULTS: The re-mobilization regimen was well-tolerated and no patient discontinued the regimen because of toxicity. Median collected WBC/kg/L (1.37 x 10(7) versus 2.62 x 10(7), p = 0.0065), MNC/kg/L (0.77 x 10(7) versus 1.97 x 10(7), p = 0.0003), CD34+ cells/kg/L (1.64 x 10(7) versus 4.18 x 10(7), p = 0.001) were significantly higher after the second mobilization (G-CSF/GM-CSF combination). Percentage of CD34+ cells in the leukapheresis was also significantly higher after the second mobilization (median 0.104% versus 0.195%, p = 0.036). Twelve of 22 patients achieved the target PBPC dose (> 3 x 10(6)/CD34+ cells/kg) after two mobilizations (six patients achieved the target from the second mobilization alone). A further eight underwent HDC-PBPCS without achieving the target PBPC dose. These patients experienced a significant delay in neutrophil and platelet engraftment when compared with those patients achieving the target dose. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF is an effective and tolerable method for re-mobilization of PBPC in patients who fail to provide an adequate yield from their first mobilization.

The CD34+ cell fraction in bone marrow and blood is not universally predictive of CFU-GM.

We have measured the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony forming cells (CFU-GM) and CD34+ cells in blood and bone marrow. We have compared these hematopoietic cell assays using regression analysis. We have found that under the limited and specific case of blood cells from an individual recovering from myelo-suppressive chemotherapy, the fraction of cells that is CD34 positive is predictive of the number of granulocyte-macrophage colonies (CFU-GM) which will grow. This result is in agreement with published data. We have found, however, that in bone marrow aspirates, or in the blood of individuals recovering from cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and receiving either granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or folinic acid (FA) therapy, there is poor correlation between CD34+ cell fraction and CFU-GM. Accordingly, the use of CD34+ fraction cannot be relied upon to substitute for the CFU-GM assay in assessing the hematopoietic cell content of blood or bone marrow samples.

Use of the Terumo SteriCell for the processing of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells.

The SteriCell cell processing instrument is a good choice for a stem cell processing laboratory that is of sufficient size that they cannot share an apheresis machine with the blood bank. It is a laboratory instrument, with no facility for patient connection. Because of its minimal size and weight, it is easily stored in a cramped laboratory. Its automated programs are appropriate for processing of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells, and it is quite easy to learn how to use (in our laboratory, most individuals have been completely facile with the SteriCell after fewer than six processings). Based on reported results from other instruments, the SteriCell provides cell yields that are comparable to competing instruments. Service (provided by Haemonetics) has been satisfactory, and support from Terumo has been excellent. We can recommend this instrument to any other laboratory.