An Outcomes-Focused Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in a Nigerian Hospital.

Background/Objectives: The benefits of laparoscopic surgery such as swifter recovery and fewer wound complications, elude much of the developing world. Nigeria, a lower middle-income country, is the most populous sub-Saharan nation; an excellent model for studying the impact of laparoscopy in resource-constrained environments. The Department of Surgery at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital and the University of Utah's Center for Global Surgery present a study of laparoscopic surgery cases in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 261 patients compared open and laparoscopic surgical outcomes for three common general surgery procedures: open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy, and open laparotomy versus diagnostic laparoscopy for biopsy of intra-abdominal mass. The primary outcome was total length of stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included wound complications, analgesia and antibiotic use, time to oral intake, and patient charges. Results: Total LOS for laparoscopic surgery was significantly shorter compared to analogous open procedures (4.7 vs 11.5 days). Postoperative LOS was also shorter (2.6 vs 8.2 days). There were no differences in wound complications. Median charges to patients were lower for laparoscopic versus open procedures ($184 vs $217 USD). Conclusions: The introduction of laparoscopy allows for significantly shorter LOS and equivalent wound complications in the context of a sub-Saharan teaching hospital. Concerns regarding higher costs of care for patients do not appear to be a significant issue. Further work is needed to evaluate costs to the hospital system as a whole, including procurement and maintenance of laparoscopic equipment.

Safety Culture and Perioperative Quality at the Volta River Authority Hospital in Akosombo, Ghana.

BACKGROUND: The Volta River Authority Hospital (VRAH) is a district hospital associated with a large public works project in Akosombo, Ghana, that has developed a reputation for high-quality care. We hypothesized that this stems from a culture of safety and standardized processes typical of high-risk engineering environments. To investigate this, we evaluated staff and patient perceptions of safety and quality, as well as perioperative process variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys were used to evaluate staff and patient perceptions of safety. Perioperative general surgery and obstetrical procedure observations generated process maps, which were analyzed for variability and waste. RESULTS: Thirty-one SAQs were administered. 83% of workers held a positive perception of teamwork, and 77.4% held a positive perception of safety culture. Fifteen HCAHPS surveys of surgical inpatients showed a median hospital rating of 10 [IQR 8.5-10] on a ten-point scale. 90% gave maximal scores for pain management and 84.4% for nurse communication. Ten general surgery and obstetrical procedures were observed for which process map analysis was notable for no consistent waste steps and 100% adherence to the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist. CONCLUSIONS: Surveys suggest an institutional commitment to safety with strong teamwork culture and patient communication. Perioperative process mapping supports this culture, with low levels of variability and waste, and is useful for evaluating standardization of care. VRAH demonstrates the feasibility of delivering high standards of perioperative care in a low-resource setting.

Thoracoscopic resection of an intrathoracic accessory liver lobe: an incidental finding in the workup of a child with a respiratory infection.

A case of an intrathoracic accessory liver lobe in a five-year-old female is presented, representing an incidental finding during workup for a respiratory infection. MRI was used to identify what appeared to be an accessory intrathoracic liver lobe. Thoracoscopy confirmed the diagnosis, and removal was achieved through a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Based on an electronic literature search, this is the first known report of minimally invasive techniques to remove accessory liver from the chest in a pediatric patient.

Primary Closure without Diversion in Management of Operative Blunt Duodenal Trauma in Children.

Background. Operative blunt duodenal trauma is rare in pediatric patients. Management is controversial with some recommending pyloric exclusion for complex cases. We hypothesized that primary closure without diversion may be safe even in complex (Grade II-III) injuries. Methods. A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Center database for the years 2003-2011 was performed to identify operative blunt duodenal trauma at our Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center. Inclusion criteria included ages <14 years and duodenal injury requiring operative intervention. Duodenal hematomas not requiring intervention and other small bowel injuries were excluded. Results. A total of 3,283 hospital records were reviewed. Forty patients with operative hollow viscous injuries and seven with operative duodenal injuries were identified. The mean Injury Severity Score was 10.4, with injuries ranging from Grades I-IV and involving all duodenal segments. All injuries were closed primarily with drain placement and assessed for leakage via fluoroscopy between postoperative days 4 and 6. The average length of stay was 11 days; average time to full feeds was 7 days. No complications were encountered. Conclusion. Blunt abdominal trauma is an uncommon mechanism of pediatric duodenal injuries. Primary repair with drain placement is safe even in more complex injuries.