Reliable Visualization of the Treatment Effect of Transperineal Focal Laser Ablation in Prostate Cancer Patients by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.

Background: Transperineal focal laser ablation (TPLA) treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) is an experimental focal ablative therapy modality with low morbidity. However, a dosimetry model for TPLA is lacking. Objective: To determine (1) the three-dimensional (3D) histologically defined ablation zone of single- and multifiber TPLA treatment for PCa correlated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and (2) a reliable imaging modality of ablation zone volumetry. Design setting and participants: This was a prospective, multicenter, and interventional phase I/II pilot study with an ablate-and-resect design. TPLA was performed in 12 patients with localized prostate cancer divided over four treatment regimens to evaluate potential variation in outcomes. Intervention: TPLA was performed approximately 4 wk prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a daycare setting using local anesthesia. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Four weeks after TPLA, ablation zone volumetry was determined on prostate MRI and CEUS by delineation and segmentation into 3D models and correlated with whole-mount RARP histology using the Pearson correlation index. Results and limitations: Twelve office-based TPLA procedures were performed successfully under continuous transrectal ultrasound guidance using local perineal anesthesia. No serious adverse events occurred. A qualitative analysis showed a clear demarcation of the ablation zone on T2-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and CEUS. On pathological evaluation, no remnant cancer was observed within the ablation zone. Ablation zone volumetry on CEUS and T2-weighted MRI compared with histology had a Pearson correlation index of r = 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.99, p < 0.001) and r = 0.93 (95% CI 0.73-0.98, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: CEUS and prostate MRI could reliably visualize TPLA ablative effects after minimally invasive PCa treatment with a high concordance with histopathological findings and showed no remnant cancer. Patient summary: The treatment effects of a novel minimally invasive ablation therapy device can reliably be visualized with radiological examinations. These results will improve planning and performance of future procedures.

Predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve and prior negative biopsy men with a negative prostate MRI: improving MRI-based screening with a novel risk calculator.

Purpose: A pre-biopsy decision aid is needed to counsel men with a clinical suspicion for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), despite normal prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A risk calculator (RC) for csPCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP) ⩾ 2) presence in men with a negative-MRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ⩽ 2) was developed, and its performance was compared with RCs of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG), and Prospective Loyola University mpMRI (PLUM). All biopsy-naïve and prior negative biopsy men with a negative-MRI followed by systematic prostate biopsy were included from October 2015 to September 2021. The RC was developed using multivariable logistic regression with the following parameters: age (years), family history of PCa (first- or second-degree family member), ancestry (African Caribbean/other), digital rectal exam (benign/malignant), MRI field strength (1.5/3.0 Tesla), prior negative biopsy status, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (ng/ml/cc). Performance of RCs was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: A total of 232 men were included for analysis, of which 18.1% had csPCa. Parameters associated with csPCa were family history of PCa (p < 0.0001), African Caribbean ancestry (p = 0.005), PSA density (p = 0.002), prior negative biopsy (p = 0.06), and age at biopsy (p = 0.157). The area under the curve (AUC) of the developed RC was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.85). This was significantly better than the RCs of the ERSPC (AUC: 0.59; p = 0.001) and PBCG (AUC: 0.60; p = 0.002), yet similar to PLUM (AUC: 0.69; p = 0.09). Conclusion: The developed RC (Prostate Biopsy Cohort Amsterdam ('PROBA' RC), integrated predictors for csPCa at prostate biopsy in negative-MRI men and outperformed other widely used RCs. These findings require external validation before introduction in daily practice.

Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [18F]DCFPyL PET/MRI compared to multiparametric MRI: a comparison with the histopathology in the radical prostatectomy specimen, the ProStaPET study.

PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a well-established imaging method for localizing primary prostate cancer (PCa) and for guiding targeted prostate biopsies. [18F]DCFPyL positron emission tomography combined with MRI (PSMA-PET/MRI) might be of additional value to localize primary PCa. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI vs. mpMRI in tumour localization based on histopathology after robot-assisted radical-prostatectomy (RARP), also assessing biopsy advice for potential image-guided prostate biopsies. METHODS: Thirty prospectively included patients with intermediate to high-risk PCa underwent [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI prior to RARP. Two nuclear medicine physicians and two radiologists assessed tumour localization on [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and on mpMRI respectively, and gave a prostate biopsy advice (2 segments) using a 14-segment model of the prostate. The uro-pathologist evaluated the RARP specimen for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) using the same model. csPCa was defined as any PCa with Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2. The biopsy advice based on imaging was correlated with the final histology in the RARP specimen for a total-agreement analysis. An additional near-agreement correlation was performed to approximate clinical reality. RESULTS: Overall, 142 of 420 (33.8%) segments contained csPCa after pathologic examination. The segments recommended for targeted biopsy contained the highest GG PCa segment in 27/30 patients (90.0%) both for [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI. Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the total-agreement detection of csPCa per segment using [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI were 0.70, 50.0%, 89.9%, 71.7%, and 77.9%, respectively. These results were 0.75, 54.2%, 94.2%, 82.8%, and 80.1%, respectively, for mpMRI only. CONCLUSION: Both [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI were only partly able to detect csPCa on a per-segment basis. An accurate detection (90.0%) of the highest GG lesion at patient-level was observed when comparing both [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI biopsy advice with the histopathology in the RARP specimen. So, despite the finding that [18F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI adequately detects csPCa, it does not outperform mpMRI.

Summarizing the 4D image stack of ultrafast dynamic contrast enhancement MRI of breast cancer in 3D using color intensity projections.

BACKGROUND: Each ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI sequence for breast cancer generates thousands of images in a 4D stack that need to be reviewed by a radiologist. PURPOSE: To assess whether color intensity projections (CIP) effectively summarizes-using only the time of arrival (ToA) and amount of signal enhancement (AoE) of the contrast agent-the thousands of ultrafast images. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cohort clinical trial. SUBJECTS: The study included 89 patients who had been scanned with an MRI beast protocol, of which 26 had breast cancer and 63 did not. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: The 115-second ultrafast DCE sequence at 3T acquired 19 consecutive frames every 4.26 seconds with 152 slices per frame, yielding a 4D stack with 2888 2D images for each of water and fat. ASSESSMENT: For each slice of the water 4D stack a single CIP image was generated that encoded the ToA in the hue (red, orange, yellow, green, cyan, blue) and AoE in the brightness. Each of three experienced radiologists assigned a Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) score for each patient, first using only the CIP images, and subsequently using both CIP and the full 4D stack. STATISTICAL TESTS: The one-sided Fisher's exact test was used to determine statistical significance of both the sensitivity and specificity between the CIP alone and the CIP plus 4D stack. RESULTS: All malignancies were detected using only CIP by at least one of the radiologists. The CIP and CIP+4D sensitivities for reader 1 were 96% and 96% (P = 0.57), specificities were 59% and 65% (P = 0.29). For reader 2, the values were 96% and 100% (P = 0.51) with 62% and 71% (P = 0.17). For reader 3 the values were 92% and 96% (P = 0.50) with 51% and 62% (P = 0.07). DATA CONCLUSION: With a 95% sensitivity, CIP provides an effective summary of ultrafast DCE images of breast cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1391-1399.

Geriatric fracture center: a multidisciplinary treatment approach for older patients with a hip fracture improved quality of clinical care and short-term treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Since April 1, 2008, patients aged ≥65 years presenting with a hip fracture at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo (ZGT-A), The Netherlands, have been admitted to the geriatric fracture center (GFC) and treated according to the multidisciplinary treatment approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate how implementation of the treatment approach has influenced the quality of care given to older patients with hip fracture. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with historical control group. METHOD: Two groups of patients with hip fracture were compared, 1 group was treated according to the new multidisciplinary treatment approach in 2009-2010, and the other group received the usual treatment in 2007-2008. The number of readmissions within 30 days after discharge was compared, and an analysis was carried out regarding the number of complications, the number of consultations with various specialists and with the geriatrician, and the duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: In all, 140 patients from 2009 to 2010 group and 90 patients from 2007 to 2008 group were included. In 2009-2010 group, the number of readmissions within 30 days dropped by 11 percentage points (P = .001). The incidence of the number of complications decreased with a median of 1 compared with 2007-2008 (P = .017) group. Delirium was diagnosed to be 6 percentage points more frequent. The median number of consultations with various specialists per patient decreased by 1 percentage point as a result of geriatrician cotreatment (P = .002). The median duration of hospital stay was 1 day shorter than that in 2007-2008 group. CONCLUSION: The use of the multidisciplinary treatment approach led to a significant reduction in the number of readmissions within 30 days after discharge. It appears to be associated with improved short-term treatment outcomes for older patients with a hip fracture.

[Multidisciplinary integrated care pathway for elderly patients with hip fractures: implementation results from Centre for Geriatric Traumatology, Almelo, The Netherlands]. / Multidisciplinair zorgpad voor oudere patiënten met een heupfractuur: resultaten van implementatie in het Centrum voor Geriatrische Traumatologie, Almelo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the implementation of a multidisciplinary treatment approach at Hospital Group Twente in Almelo, Netherlands, of hip fracture patients aged 65 years and older. DESIGN: Historical comparative cohort study. METHOD: Two groups of patients with hip fractures were retrospectively compared. One of these groups had been treated in 2009 according to the new, multidisciplinary treatment approach; the other in 2007 by usual means. Observations included the duration of hospital stay, as well as the numbers of complications, readmissions and consultations by other specialities. RESULTS: Included were 101 patients from 2009 and 69 from 2007. In 2009, the mean duration of hospital stay was 1 day longer than in 2007. Patients admitted to a nursing home for rehabilitation increased by 16 percentage points. The incidence of minor complications decreased by 7 percentage points; that of severe complications, 5 percentage points. The diagnosis of delirium was made significantly more often (15 percentage points more; p-value: 0.051). The rate of death decreased by 5 percentage points. The number of readmissions within 30 days declined by 14 percentage points (p-value: 0.001). Due to geriatric co-treatment (co-managed care), consultations by various specialities were fewer per patient. CONCLUSION: No reduction in the duration of hospital stay was achieved by implementation of the multidisciplinary treatment approach. It did appear that a relationship with better short-term treatment outcomes for the elderly with hip fractures existed.