Unsuitability of sump tubes for delivery of enteral nutrition and medications to intensive care unit patients.

16 Fr Salem Sump™ tubes have special features to facilitate suction drainage of the stomach, including a second lumen for air venting. These tubes are also commonly used to deliver enteral nutrition and medications to intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but we found no previous research to justify this practice. Because of the unused air vent, these tubes have a large external diameter and a small bore infusion channel (no larger than that of a single lumen 12 Fr feeding tube). The causes of 16 Fr Salem Sump tube obstructions in 17 ICU patients included clogged medications (8 cases) and precipitation of feeding formula (7 cases), each of which would be promoted by a narrow bore. Because of multiple drainage holes at their distal end, these tubes cannot be thoroughly cleansed by standard water flushing; moreover, their drainage holes mandate a deeper length of tube insertion beyond the gastroesophageal junction, which increases the likelihood of intestinal or pulmonary perforation. For these reasons, we conclude that 16 Fr Salem Sump tubes are inferior to standard feeding tubes for delivery of enteral nutrition and medications to patients in medical ICUs.

Deaths associated with insertion of nasogastric tubes for enteral nutrition in the medical intensive care unit: Clinical and autopsy findings.

It is generally assumed that blind insertion of nasogastric tubes for enteral nutrition in patients admitted to medical intensive care units is safe; that is, does not result in life-threatening injury. If death occurs in temporal association with insertion of a nasogastric tube, caregivers typically attribute it to underlying diseases, with little or no consideration of iatrogenic death due to tube insertion. The clinical and autopsy results in three recent cases at Baylor University Medical Center challenge the validity of these notions.