"It's called overamping": experiences of overdose among people who use methamphetamine.

BACKGROUND: The USA is experiencing increases in methamphetamine use and methamphetamine-related or attributed deaths. In the current study, we explore qualitative narratives of methamphetamine overdose and strategies used by people who use drugs to reduce the undesirable effects associated with methamphetamine use. METHODS: We conducted 21 qualitative interviews with people over the age of 18 who reported using methamphetamine in the previous 3 months in Nevada and New Mexico. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Respondents described a constellation of psychological and physical symptoms that they characterized as "overamping," experienced on a continuum from less to more severe. Reports of acute, fatal methamphetamine overdose were rare. Few reported seeking medical attention for undesirable effects (usually related to psychological effects). General self-care strategies such as sleeping and staying hydrated were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: When asked directly, our respondents claimed that acute, fatal methamphetamine overdose is rare or even impossible. However, they described a number of undesirable symptoms associated with overconsumption of methamphetamine and had few clinical or harm reduction strategies at their disposal. Addressing this current wave of drug-related deaths will require attention to the multiple factors that structure experiences of methamphetamine "overdose," and a collaborative effort with PWUDs to devise effective harm reduction and treatment strategies.

The mobile emergency recovery intervention trial (MERIT): Protocol for a 3-year mixed methods observational study of mobile recovery outreach teams in Nevada's emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration awarded State Targeted Response grants to support states' efforts to address the opioid epidemic. In Nevada, one component of this grant was mobile recovery outreach teams (MROTs) that utilized peer recovery support specialists to provide care for qualifying patients in emergency departments (EDs). The Mobile Emergency Recovery Intervention Trial (MERIT) is a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility/acceptability and effectiveness of the MROT intervention. This protocol mainly describes the R33 research activities and outcomes. The full protocol can be found protocols.io. METHODS: Data will be derived from state-level data sets containing de-identified emergency department visits, substance use disorder treatment records, and mortality files; in-person mixed methods interviews; participant observation; and self-report process evaluation forms. Primary outcomes include Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) initiation and non-fatal overdose; secondary outcomes include MAT retention and fatal overdose. Quantitative hypotheses will be tested using generalized linear mixed effects models, Bayesian hierarchical models, and marginal Cox models. Qualitative interview data will be analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis procedure. DISCUSSION: It is impossible to conduct a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of the MROTs, given the ethical and logistical considerations of this intervention.This study's innovative design employs a mixed methods formative phase to examine feasibility and acceptability, and a quasi-experimental outcomes evaluation phase employing advanced statistical methods to mitigate bias and suggest causal inference regarding the effectiveness of the MROTs.Innovative interventions have been deployed in many states; evidence regarding their effectiveness is lacking, but critical to informing an effective public health response to the opioid epidemic.

"It's Gonna be a Lifeline": Findings From Focus Group Research to Investigate What People Who Use Opioids Want From Peer-Based Postoverdose Interventions in the Emergency Department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Postoverdose interventions that deploy peer recovery support specialists to emergency departments (EDs) are a promising response to opioid overdoses among patients presenting in EDs. The objective of this study was to elicit patients' perspectives regarding the feasibility and acceptability of such an intervention and to ensure that their perspectives are represented in intervention design, implementation, and evaluation. METHOD: In 2019 the study investigators conducted focus groups with people who use opioids to elicit perspectives about a postoverdose intervention delivered in the ED by using a semistructured interview guide that asked about feasibility, acceptability, perceived benefits, and concerns. Focus groups were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for emerging themes. RESULTS: Nine focus groups with 30 people who use opioids were conducted. Key findings that could improve feasibility and acceptability of the intervention include the following: the importance of balancing the urgency of seeing patients quickly with a need to accommodate the experience of precipitated withdrawal symptoms; the need to address privacy concerns; and the need to address concerns related to cost, insurance coverage, and sustainability. Perceived benefits of the intervention included the ability of the peer recovery support specialist to provide advocacy and support, serve as a model of hope and encouragement for behavior change, and fill key service gaps. CONCLUSION: Postoverdose interventions in the ED provide the opportunity to integrate harm reduction-based interventions into traditional biomedical care facilities. These interventions can fill gaps in services and provide additional care and comfort for people who use opioids, but design, implementation, and evaluation should be informed by a patient-centered care perspective.

Emergency department-based peer support for opioid use disorder: Emergent functions and forms.

Emergency department (ED)-based peer support programs aimed at linking persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) to medication for addiction treatment and other recovery services are a promising approach to addressing the opioid crisis. This brief report draws on experiences from three states' experience with such programs funded by the SAMHSA Opioid State Targeted Repose (STR) grants. Core functions of such programs include: Integration of peer supports in EDs; Alerting peers of eligible patients and making the patient aware of peer services; and connecting patients with recovery services. Qualitative data were analyzed using a general inductive approach conducted in 3 steps in order to identify forms utilized to fulfill these functions. Peer integration differed in terms of peer's physical location and who hired and supervised peers. Peers often depend on ED staff to alert them to potential patients while people other than the peers often first introduce potential patients to programming. Programs generally schedule initial appointments for recovery services for patients, but some programs provide a range of other services aimed at supporting participation in recovery services. Future effectiveness evaluations of ED-based peer support programs for OUD should consistently report on forms used to fulfill core functions.

"Another tool for the tool box? I'll take it!": Feasibility and acceptability of mobile recovery outreach teams (MROT) for opioid overdose patients in the emergency room.

Drug poisoning deaths involving opioids have increased exponentially in the United States. Post-overdose outreach to patients in the emergency room (ER) is a promising strategy for increasing uptake of medication assisted treatment and reducing subsequent overdose. We conducted a mixed methods study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile recovery outreach team (MROT) program for opioid overdose patients presenting in Nevada's ERs, which was funded by the SAMHSA Opioid State Targeted Response (STR) grant. We interviewed 25 ER staff using quantitative questions informed by Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory and qualitative questions regarding their experiences caring for overdose patients, perceived benefits, and concerns about the MROT program. Respondents expressed strong support and enthusiasm for the program, identified advantages of the program relative to standard of care, highlighted logistical issues that must be addressed prior to implementation, and illustrated how the MROT program is compatible with their personal and professional values. Our results suggest that the STR-funded MROT program could reduce burden and stress among ER staff and improve patient outcomes, but must be informed by formative research that addresses issues of logistical complexity and cultural compatibility.