Is the pre-operative wound culture necessary before skin grafting minor burns? A pilot study in a low resource setting burn service.

The most common cited cause of split-thickness skin graft failure is infection and due to the association between bacterial findings in wound beds an attempt to decrease the bacterial burden before skin-grafting evolved. Thus, pre-operative microbiology swabs of the wound bed became routine at some institutions prior to grafting. This is not standard practice in the Pietermaritzburg burn service. Emphasis is instead placed on a strict protocol of intra-operative wound bed preparation to promote adequate graft take. This pilot study aims to evaluate whether pre-operative wound swabs are appropriate. We performed a prospective observational study to determine if positive wound cultures were associated with graft failure. All patients with a burn surface area of less than 10 %, where delayed grafting (later than 28 days from time of burn injury) was performed, from March to December 2021 were analyzed. Patient demographics, days from burn to graft, %TBSA burn, %TBSA grafted, whether sharp debridement prior to grafting in the same procedure was performed or not, use of topical gentamicin intra-operatively, graft outcome (% graft loss), need for regraft, and organism grown were recorded into an excel spread sheet for analysis. The sample included 52 patients. Of these, 17 (31.5%) were female. The median %TBSA grafted was 8% (IQR 4-13%) and similar in both groups. The median days from burn to grafting was 35 days. Thirty-nine patients (75%) had graft Take and 13 (25%) had graft Failure. In the failed group, median % graft failure was 50% (30 - 70%). Of the group with successful graft take, 90% were noted to have had a positive wound culture prior to grafting. A positive wound culture was not found to be a risk factor for graft failure (p=0.993). Despite the positive wound cultures graft take was more than 90 % in 75% of grafts performed and only 2/52 patients required supplementary grafting. We believe that this demonstrates that our local protocol is reasonable in this setting and that waiting for negative wound swabs prior to grafting should not be a reason to delay grafting.

High grade renal trauma: Does the mechanism of penetrating injury influence renal salvage rate?

BACKGROUND: Most of the data on high grade Traumatic renal injuries (TRI) has come from centres which predominantly encounter blunt trauma. Blunt and penetrating mechanisms are not analogous, and it is imprudent to blindly extrapolate management strategies between the two groups. In addition, within the broad group of penetrating mechanisms of injury there are also major differences between gunshot wounds (GSW) and stab wounds (SW). The aim of this comparative study of GSW and SW to the kidney is to quantify the impact of the mechanism of injury on nephrectomy rate in high grade TRI. METHODS: A prospective trauma registry was interrogated retrospectively. All patients sustaining a high grade (Grade III to V) penetrating TRI were included. The diagnosis was made either with cross-sectional imaging or intra-operative findings. The nephrectomy rate of the different mechanisms of penetrating (GSW vs SW) TRI was compared in each grade. RESULTS: A total of 28 GSW and 27 SW causing high grade TRIs (Grade III-V) were included over the 85 months of the study. GSW lead to a higher nephrectomy rate than SWs 50.0 vs 19%, (p = 0.023). When comparing grade for grade, Grade III: 20.0 (GSW) vs 21% (SW), (p = 1). Grade IV: 71 (GSW) vs 17%, (SW) (p = 0.058) and Grade V: 100 (GSW) vs 0%, (SW) (p = 0.28). When comparing Grade IV - V together, the difference is 85 (GSW) vs 15%, (SW) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: On a grade to grade comparison GSWs have a much higher risk for nephrectomy than SW's in grade IV and V TRI. TRI secondary to GSWs appears to be an independent risk factor for nephrectomy in high grade injuries. The mechanism of penetrating TRI should be considered in future management algorithms and clinical approaches.

Evolving Indications for Lower Limb Amputations in South Africa Offer Opportunities for Health System Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Rapid urbanization and westernization have precipitated dramatic changes in the profile and prevalence of surgical diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. Disease of lifestyle is now common. We aimed to review our experience with lower-limb amputations at our surgical service in South Africa. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed of all patients who underwent a lower limb amputation. Inferential and descriptive statistics were performed. Patient demographics, indication, type of amputation, and management were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30-day in-patient mortality rate. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period (2013-2018), 348 patients underwent lower limb amputations. The median age was 61.5 years. 53.7% were diabetic and 56.3% were hypertensive. 53.2% had associated peripheral vascular disease and 8% preexisting cardiac disease. 30.7% smoked. Guillotine below-knee amputation was frequently performed (44.5% of amputations). 16.1% of these patients required a further operation. The in-hospital mortality rate was 8%. Underlying renal disease was an independent risk factor for mortality (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Currently, the most common indications for LLA in South Africa are diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. This reflects the changing pattern of disease in the country. There is a major problem with access to health care in rural areas in South Africa with significant delays in getting patients to tertiary units for evaluation by specialists. Foot care and prevention at a primary health care level is also lacking. Global improvements in the healthcare system are needed to improve LLA rates in South Africa.