Single versus dual incision approaches for dual plating of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures have comparable rates of deep infection and revision surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The use of one midline incision versus dual medial/lateral incisions for dual plating of bicondylar tibial plateau (BTP) fractures is controversial. This study aimed to compare rates of infection and secondary surgery in patients treated with dual plating for a BTP fracture using a single versus double incisions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients > 18 years with a closed AO/OTA 41-C BTP fracture without compartment syndrome treated with a single midline or dual incision (lateral with medial or posteromedial) approach for dual plating. INTERVENTION: Dual plating through either a single anterior incision, or dual medial/lateral incisions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of deep infection and reoperation were compared using Chi-square analysis (p-value of < 0.05). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In total 636 AO/OTA 41-C BTP fractures treated between 1/1/01 and 12/31/18 were identified and assessed. After exclusions for limited follow up, other techniques, open fracture and the need for fasciotomies, 346 patients were studied. Of these 254 had been treated with a single plate / single approach technique while 92 had been dual plated, 41 through a single anterior incision while 51 had dual plating through separate lateral and medial or posteromedial incisions. For these 92 fractures, there was no significant difference in the rate of deep infection (22.0% vs 23.5%, s=0.858) or reoperation (31.7% vs 31.4%, p=0.973) between the single and dual incision groups. Injuries that had been treated with single plating via a single incision had comparably lower rates of deep infection (10.2% vs. 22.8%, p=0.003) and reoperation (12.2% vs. 31.5%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in any demographic parameters between patients undergoing single versus dual plating. Although retrospective, not randomized and subject to single surgeon bias these data suggest that these complications are more based on injury than the approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Non-union bone fractures.

The human skeleton has remarkable regenerative properties, being one of the few structures in the body that can heal by recreating its normal cellular composition, orientation and mechanical strength. When the healing process of a fractured bone fails owing to inadequate immobilization, failed surgical intervention, insufficient biological response or infection, the outcome after a prolonged period of no healing is defined as non-union. Non-union represents a chronic medical condition not only affecting function but also potentially impacting the individual's psychosocial and economic well-being. This Primer provides the reader with an in-depth understanding of our contemporary knowledge regarding the important features to be considered when faced with non-union. The normal mechanisms involved in bone healing and the factors that disrupt the normal signalling mechanisms are addressed. Epidemiological considerations and advances in the diagnosis and surgical therapy of non-union are highlighted and the need for greater efforts in basic, translational and clinical research are identified.

Complications and Soft-Tissue Coverage After Complete Articular, Open Tibial Plafond Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of nonunion and wound complications after open, complete articular pilon fractures. Second, to study the effect that both timing of fixation and timing of flap coverage have on deep infection rates. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Three Academic Level 1 Trauma Centers. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-one patients with open OTA/AO type 43C distal tibia fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) between 2002 and 2018. The mean (SD) age was 46 (14) years, 70% male, with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.1 (1.3-5.0) years (minimum 1 year). There were 133 (83%) type 3A and 28 (17%) type 3B open fractures. INTERVENTION: Fracture fixation: acute, primary (<24 hours) versus delayed, staged ORIF (>24 hours). Soft-tissue coverage: rotational or free flap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Primary outcomes included deep infection and nonunion. Secondary outcomes included rates of soft-tissue coverage and reoperation. RESULTS: Acute fixation (<24 hours) was performed in 36 (22%) patients; 125 (78%) underwent delayed, staged fixation. Deep infection occurred in 27% patients and was associated with men (33% vs. 16%, P = 0.029), smoking (38% vs. 23%, P = 0.047), and type 3B fractures (39% vs. 25%, P = 0.046). Acute fixation of type 3A fractures demonstrated a higher rate of infection (38% vs. 20% P = 0.036) than delayed, staged fixation. In type 3B fractures, early flap coverage (<1 week) demonstrated a lower rate of infection (18% vs. 53%, P = 0.066) and 20% (vs. 43%) with a single-staged "fix and flap" procedure (P = 0.408). Nonunion occurred in 36 (22%) and was associated with deep infection (43% vs. 15%, P < 0.001). Fifteen (42%) were septic nonunions. Twenty-nine of the 36 (81%) nonunions achieved radiographic union after median (interquartile range) 27 (20-41) weeks and median (range) 1 (1-3) revision ORIF procedures. There was no difference in the rate of secondary union between septic and aseptic nonunions (85% vs. 86%, P = 1.00). There was a high rate of secondary procedures (47%): revision ORIF (17%), irrigation and debridement (15%), and removal of implants (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Complete articular, open pilon fractures are associated with a high rate of complications after ORIF. Early fixation carries a high risk of deep infection; however, early flap coverage for 3B fractures seems to play a protective role. We advocate for aggressive management including urgent surgical debridement and very early soft-tissue cover combined with definitive fixation during single procedure if possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Judicious Use of Early Fixation of Closed, Complete Articular Pilon Fractures Is Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Deep Infection or Wound Complications.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the deep infection rates after immediate versus staged open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for pilon fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three academic Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Four hundred one patients with closed OTA/AO type 43C distal tibia fractures treated with ORIF. Sixty-six percent were men, and the mean age was 45.6 years. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 1.7 (1.0-3.7) years. INTERVENTION: Acute, primary (<24 hours) versus delayed, staged ORIF (>24 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Deep infection or wound complication as defined by return to operating room for surgical irrigation and debridement. RESULTS: Patients were grouped by time from presentation to surgery: acute ORIF (n = 99) and delayed ORIF (n = 302). Acute ORIF was more frequent in patients with OTA/AO type 43C1 fractures, low-energy mechanisms (ie, fall from standing), younger and female patients. Patients who demonstrated severe swelling (242, 80%), swelling and fracture blisters (26, 9%), swelling and ecchymosis precluding planned surgical approach (4, 1%), polytrauma requiring resuscitation (20, 6%), who were transferred from an outside facility with external fixator in place (6, 2%), who had evolving compartment syndrome (2, 1%), and who required medical clearance (2, 1%) underwent staged, delayed fixation. There were significantly more 43C1 fractures in the acute fixation group (31% vs. 7%, P < 0.001) and significantly more 43C3 fractures in the delayed group (63% vs. 37%, P < 0.001). The overall deep infection rate was 17%. Early surgery was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complication (early 12% vs. delayed 18%, P = 0.235). Multivariate analysis adjusted for timing of surgery found high-energy trauma [odds ratio (OR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-13.8], smoking (OR 2.4, CI 1.3-4.6), male sex (OR 2.1, CI 1.0-4.1), and increasing age (OR 1.02, CI 1.00-1.04, P = 0.040) to be independent predictors of deep infection. Diabetes demonstrated a nonstatistically significant increased risk (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.3, P = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the high risk of infection after the fixation of tibial plafond fractures. If early definitive fixation is considered, extreme care should be taken to carefully evaluate the soft tissue envelope and assess for other risk factors (such as age, male sex, smokers, diabetics, and those with higher-energy fracture patterns) that may predispose the patient to a postoperative soft tissue infection. Our study has shown that the judicious use of early definitive fixation in closed pilon fractures, in the appropriate patient, and with careful evaluation of the soft tissue envelope, is likely safe and does not seem to increase the risk of wound complications and deep infection in the hands of experienced fracture surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Axillary Artery Injury Associated with Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Report of 6 Cases.

Proximal humerus fractures are common, but associated injury of the axillary artery is uncommon. The majority of published blunt traumatic axillary artery injuries are associated with anterior glenohumeral dislocation; a few are associated with isolated proximal humerus fractures or fracture-dislocation. Experience within our institution demonstrates that axillary artery injury is often unrecognized on initial presentation owing to palpable peripheral pulses and the absence of ischemia and places the hand at risk of necrosis and amputation if there is prolonged ischemia and the forearm at risk of compartment syndrome after revascularization. Accurate physical examination in combination with a low threshold for Doppler examination or angiography can establish the diagnosis of axillary artery injury. We present 6 cases of axillary artery injury associated with proximal humerus fractures in order to highlight the potential for this vascular injury in the setting of a proximal humerus fracture.

Do trauma systems work? A comparison of major trauma outcomes between Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Massachusetts General Hospital.

Trauma is an important matter of public health and a major cause of mortality. Since the late 1980s trauma care provision in the United Kingdom is lacking when compared to the USA. This has been attributed to a lack of organisation of trauma care leading to the formation of trauma networks and Major Trauma Centres in England and Wales. The need for similar centres in Scotland is argued currently. We assessed the activity of two quite different trauma systems by obtaining access to comparative data from two hospitals, one in the USA and the other in Scotland. Aggregate data on 5604 patients at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI) from 1993 to 2002 was obtained from the Scottish Trauma Audit Group. A comparable data set of 16,178 patients from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Direct comparison of patient demographics; injury type, mechanism and Injury Severity Score (ISS); mode of arrival; length of stay and mortality were made. Statistical analysis was carried out using Chi-squared and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel. There were significant differences in the data sets. There was a higher proportion of penetrating injuries at MGH, (8.6% vs 2.6%) and more severely injured patients at MGH, patients with an ISS>16 accounted for nearly 22.1% of MGH patients compared to 14.0% at ARI. ISS 8-15 made up 54.6% of ARI trauma with 29.6% at MGH. Falls accounted for 50.1% at ARI and 37.9% at MGH. Despite the higher proportion of severe injuries at MGH and crude mortality rates showing no difference (4.9% ARI vs 5.2% MGH), pooled odds ratio of mortality was 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6) showing worse mortality outcomes at ARI compared to MGH. In conclusion, there were some differences in case mix between both data sets making direct comparison of the outcomes difficult, but the effect of consolidating major trauma on the proportion and number of severely injured patients treated in the American Level 1 centre was clear with a significant improvement in mortality in all injury severity groups.

Opioid use after fracture surgery correlates with pain intensity and satisfaction with pain relief.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, Medicare began to tie reimbursements to inpatient complications, unplanned readmissions, and patient satisfaction, including satisfaction with pain management. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed to identify factors that correlate with (1) pain intensity during a 24-hour period after surgery; (2) less than complete satisfaction with pain control; (3) less than complete satisfaction with staff attention to pain relief while in the hospital; and we also wished (4) to compare inpatient and discharge satisfaction scores. METHODS: Ninety-seven inpatients completed measures of pain intensity (numeric rating scale), satisfaction with pain relief, self-efficacy when in pain, and symptoms of depression days after operative fracture repair. The amount of opioid used in oral morphine equivalents taken during the prior 24 hours was calculated. Through initial bivariate and then multivariate analysis, we identified factors that were associated with pain intensity, less than complete satisfaction with pain control, and less than complete satisfaction with staff attention to pain relief. RESULTS: Patients who took more opioids reported greater pain intensity (r = 0.38). No factors representative of greater nociception (fracture type, number of fractures, days from injury to surgery, days from surgery to enrollment, or type of surgery) correlated with greater pain intensity. The best multivariable model for greater pain intensity included: depression or anxiety disorder (p = 0.019), smoking (0.047), and greater opioid intake (p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis for less than ideal satisfaction with pain control included the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99) alone; for less than ideal satisfaction with staff attention to pain control, the PSEQ (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99) and opioid medication use before admission (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-12) were included. CONCLUSIONS: After operative fracture treatment, patients who take more opioids report greater pain intensity and less satisfaction with pain relief. Greater self-efficacy was the best determinant of satisfaction with pain relief. Evidence-based interventions to increase self-efficacy merit additional study for the management of postoperative pain during recovery from a fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictors of readmission in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study of patients who had operative treatment of skeletal trauma addresses (1) the association between readmission within 30 days of discharge and comorbidities and (2) differences in factors associated with all-cause readmissions and those because of a surgical adverse event. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Three thousand four hundred fifty-two operations for skeletal trauma between 2008 and 2012 with comorbidities quantified using the updated Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Readmission to the hospital within 30 days of surgery and the subset of readmissions because of adverse events related directly to surgery. RESULTS: There was a significant association between readmission within 30 days of surgery and higher CCI (P < 0.001), older age (P < 0.001), and marital status (widowed) (P < 0.001). The factors associated with readmission related to an adverse event were identical. The best multivariable logistic regression models for all-cause 30-day readmission and 30-day readmission related to a surgical adverse event included CCI and older age in both models (odds ratio 1.1, P < 0.01, pseudo R = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients and patients with greater comorbidity are more likely to be readmitted within 30 days of surgery for musculoskeletal trauma, whether for a surgical adverse event or another reason. The best multivariable models predicted very little of the variability in readmission, which reflects the complexity of readmission and the difficulty reducing the risk to a few specific factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Psychological factors predict disability and pain intensity after skeletal trauma.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to (1) estimate the prevalence of clinical depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) one to two months (Time 1) and five to eight months (Time 2) after musculoskeletal trauma and (2) determine the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship of psychological variables (depression, PTSD, catastrophic thinking, and pain anxiety) at Time 1 to musculoskeletal disability and pain intensity at Time 1 and Time 2, after accounting for injury characteristics and demographic variables. METHODS: Patients with one or more fractures that had been treated operatively completed measures of depression, PTSD, pain anxiety, catastrophic thinking, musculoskeletal disability (the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment [SMFA]), and pain (the Numerical Rating Scale) at rest and during activity at Time 1 (152 patients) and at Time 2 (136 patients). Additional explanatory variables included injury severity, use of opioid pain medication at Time 1, and multiple or single injuries. RESULTS: The screening criteria for an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression were met by thirty-five of the 152 patients at Time 1, and twenty-nine of the 136 patients at Time 2. Screening criteria for an estimated diagnosis of PTSD were met by forty-three of the 152 patients at Time 1 and twenty-five of the 136 patients at Time 2. Cross-sectional hierarchical linear regression models that included multiple injuries, scores of the Abbreviated Injury Scale, and self-reported opioid use explained between 24% and 29% of the variance in pain and disability, respectively, at Time 1. After the addition of psychological variables, the model explained between 49% and 55% of the variance. Catastrophic thinking (as measured with use of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale) at Time 1 was the sole significant predictor of pain at rest, pain during activity, and disability (as measured with use of the SMFA) at Time 2. CONCLUSIONS: We found that psychological factors that are responsive to cognitive behavioral therapy--catastrophic thinking, in particular--are strongly associated with pain intensity and disability in patients recovering from musculoskeletal trauma.

Diagnosis of union of distal tibia fractures: accuracy and interobserver reliability.

Decisions about return to activity and additional surgery are often made on the basis of radiographs obtained 3 months after injury. If radiographs 3 months after injury cannot reliably and accurately diagnose union, then patients may be needlessly disabled and might receive unnecessary treatments including surgery. We evaluated the accuracy and the reliability of the diagnosis of union or eventual union on radiographs obtained 3 months after open reduction and internal fixation of a fracture of the distal tibia by having 69 trauma surgeons evaluate radiographs of 33 consecutively treated patients in an online survey. Observers were also asked to judge specific criteria that are commonly used to diagnose fracture union. There was moderate interobserver reliability for the diagnosis of union or diagnosis of "eventual union". The interobserver agreement for the various specific radiographic signs of union varied between fair to moderate. The sensitivity of radiographs for diagnosis of "union or eventual union" of distal tibia fractures was 47%, the specificity was 73% and the accuracy was 68%. The prevalence adjusted positive predictive value was 25% and the negative predictive value was 88%. Diagnosis of union based on radiographs 3 months after injury is only moderately reliable and accurate but has a high negative predictive value. Decisions about activity level and additional treatment 3 months after injury should not be based on radiographs alone.

Fracture pattern and fixation type related to loss of reduction in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures can be treated with locked plating applied from the lateral side with or without additional application of a medial plate (dual plating). Recent studies demonstrate that these injuries can be sub-grouped based upon their morphology by computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between fracture pattern, method of fixation and loss of reduction in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative CT scans and postoperative plain films were evaluated on a consecutive series of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Fracture patterns were classified by CT. Angular alignment was measured immediately postoperatively and again at clinical and radiographic union to assess loss of reduction. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were studied. Sixty-six (47%) had a single large medial fragment with the articular surface intact, 19 (14%) had a medial articular fracture line with a mainly sagittal component and 55 (39%) had a coronal fracture through the medial articular surface. A total of 129 patients had been treated with lateral locked plating alone whilst 11 patients (all with a coronal fracture of the medial condyle) underwent dual plating. There was little loss of reduction (median subsidence 0.5°) when lateral locked plating was employed alone in patients with a single medial fracture fragment or with a sagittal medial fracture line. When lateral locked plating was used in the presence of a medial coronal fracture line, there was a significantly higher rate of subsidence (median 2.0°) compared to those with no medial fracture line (p=0.002). Patients with coronal fracture lines treated with dual plating had significantly less loss of reduction that those treated with lateral locked plating (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures do well when treated with lateral locked plating. However, those with a medial coronal fracture line tend to have a higher rate of subsidence and loss of reduction when lateral locked plating is employed alone. These fractures may be better treated with dual plating if the soft tissues allow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (retrospective comparative study).

Challenges and barriers to improving care of the musculoskeletal patient of the future - a debate article and global perspective.

BACKGROUND: With greater technological developments in the care of musculoskeletal patients, we are entering an era of rapid change in our understanding of the pathophysiology of traumatic injury; assessment and treatment of polytrauma and related disorders; and treatment outcomes. In developed countries, it is very likely that we will have algorithms for the approach to many musculoskeletal disorders as we strive for the best approach with which to evaluate treatment success. This debate article is founded on predictions of future health care needs that are solely based on the subjective inputs and opinions of the world's leading orthopedic surgeons.Hence, it functions more as a forum-based rather than a scientific-based presentation. This exposé was designed to stimulate debate about the emerging patients' needs in the future predicted by leading orthopedic surgeons that provide some hint as to the right direction for orthopedic care and outlines the important topics in this area. DISCUSSION: The authors aim to provide a general overview of orthopedic care in a typical developed country setting. However, the regional diversity of the United States and every other industrialized nation should be considered as a cofactor that may vary to some extent from our vision of improved orthopedic and trauma care of the musculoskeletal patient on an interregional level.In this forum, we will define the current and future barriers in developed countries related to musculoskeletal trauma, total joint arthroplasty, patient safety and injuries related to military conflicts, all problems that will only increase as populations age, become more mobile, and deal with political crisis. SUMMARY: It is very likely that the future will bring a more biological approach to fracture care with less invasive surgical procedures, flexible implants, and more rapid rehabilitation methods. This international consortium challenges the trauma and implants community to develop outcome registries that are managed through health care offices and to prepare effectively for the many future challenges that lie in store for those who treat musculoskeletal conditions.

Observed and expected outcomes in transfer and nontransfer patients with a hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES: Hospitals and providers that accept transfer patients risk lower ratings on publically reported quality measures that are inadequately adjusted for infirmity and complexity. We compared the outcomes of transferred patients and nontransferred patients after treatment of a hip fracture and sought to determine if expected outcomes based on an expansion of All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRGs) norms are accurately adjusted for transfer status. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Four hundred six consecutive patients 65 years and older who received operative treatment of an acute hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Patients who were transferred from another acute care hospital or a skilled nursing facility before treatment were classified as transfer patients (n = 123), and all other patients were nontransfer patients (n = 283). MAIN OUTCOME: Groups were compared with respect to in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), excess days over the geometric mean length of stay (GMLOS), and readmission rate as well as expected length of stay (Exp LOS) and expected mortality (Exp Mort) based on APR-DRG norms and additional adjustment for transfer status. RESULTS: Transfer patients had significantly greater LOS (10.2 vs 9.6 days; P < 0.05), Exp LOS (9.7 vs 7.7 days; P < 0.001), Exp Mort (0.07 vs 0.03; P = 0.004), and excess days over the GMLOS (4.1 vs 3.3 days; P = 0.025) than nontransfer patients, near-significant greater in-hospital mortality (9.8 vs 4.9%; P = 0.069), and similar readmission rates. The differences in LOS and Exp LOS were nonsignificant in both transfer (P = 0.49) and nontransfer patients (P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Patients 65 years and older transferred to a tertiary care facility for treatment of an acute hip fracture have worse outcome than nontransfer patients. Unadjusted data such as in-hospital mortality may be misleading, but risk adjustment using the APR-DRG methodology and additional correction for transfer status may provide meaningful benchmarks.

Autologous bone grafting on steroids: preliminary clinical results. A novel treatment for nonunions and segmental bone defects.

Clinical management of delayed healing or nonunion of long bone fractures and segmental bone defects poses a substantial orthopaedic challenge. Surgical advances and bone tissue engineering are providing new avenues to stimulate bone growth in cases of bone loss and nonunion. The reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) device allows surgeons to aspirate the medullary contents of long bones and use the progenitor-rich "flow-through" fraction in autologous bone grafting. Dexamethasone (DEX) is a synthetic steroid that has been shown to induce osteoblastic differentiation. A series of 13 patients treated with RIA bone grafting enhanced with DEX for nonunion or segmental defect was examined retrospectively to assess the quality of bony union and clinical outcomes. Despite the initial poor prognoses, promising results were achieved using this technique; and given the complexity of these cases the observed success is of great value and warrants controlled study into both standardisation of the procedure and concentration of the grafting material.

Predictors of bleeding from stable pelvic fractures.

HYPOTHESIS: Stable pelvic fractures (SPFs) that do not need operative fixation are only infrequently associated with significant bleeding (SigBleed). Our hypothesis is that simple indicators, easily detectable at the bedside, can alert the clinician about the likelihood of bleeding and the need for closer monitoring or early intervention in patients with SPFs. DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records. SETTING: Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: The medical records of patients with SPFs admitted to our academic level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2002, to June 30, 2007, were reviewed. Stable pelvic fractures were defined as fractures not requiring external or internal fixation. SigBleed was defined as the need for blood transfusion and/or intervention for bleeding control within the first 24 hours after admission. The patients were divided into group A, which included patients without SigBleed; group B, which included patients with SigBleed of a nonpelvic cause; and group C, which included patients with SigBleed caused by the SPF. The 3 groups were compared by univariate and multivariate analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Significant bleeding from SPFs. RESULTS: Of 391 patients with SPFs, 280 (72%) were in group A, 90 (23%) were in group B, and 21 (5%) were in group C. Compared with group A patients, those in group C were older and had a lower hematocrit and systolic blood pressure on admission. They also had longer hospital stays and a higher mortality. The following independent predictors of SigBleed from SPF were identified: hematocrit of 30% or lower (odds ratio [OR], 43.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.78-197.32; P < .001); presence of pelvic hematoma on computed tomographic scan (OR, 39.37; 95% CI, 4.58-338.41; P < .001); and systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or lower (OR, 18.352; 95% CI, 1.98-169.87; P = .01). When all independent predictors were present, 100% of the patients had SigBleed; when all were absent, no one had SigBleed. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SigBleed due to SPFs is low (5% in this study) and independently predicted by an admission hematocrit of 30% or lower, the presence of a pelvic hematoma on computed tomographic scan, and systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or lower.

Infirmity and injury complexity are risk factors for surgical-site infection after operative fracture care.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgical-site infections prolong hospital stays, double rehospitalization rates, and increase healthcare costs. Additionally, patients with orthopaedic surgical-site infections (SSI) have substantially greater physical limitations and reductions in their health-related quality of life. However, the risk factors for SSI after operative fracture care are unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: We determined the incidence and quantified modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for SSIs in patients with orthopaedic trauma undergoing surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively indentified, from our prospective trauma database and billing records, 1611 patients who underwent 1783 trauma-related procedures between 2006 and 2008. Medical records were reviewed and demographics, surgery-specific data, and whether the patients had an SSI were recorded. We determined which if any variables predicted SSI. RESULTS: Six factors independently predicted SSI: (1) the use of a drain, OR 2.3, 95% CI (1.3-3.8); (2) number of operations OR 3.4, 95% CI (2.0-6.0); (3) diabetes, OR 2.1, 95% CI (1.2-3.8); (4) congestive heart failure (CHF), OR 2.8, 95% CI (1.3-6.5); (5) site of injury tibial shaft/plateau, OR 2.3, 95% CI (1.3-4.2); and (6) site of injury, elbow, OR 2.2, 95% CI (1.1-4.7). CONCLUSION: The risk factors for SSIs after skeletal trauma are most strongly determined by nonmodifiable factors: patient infirmity (diabetes and heart failure) and injury complexity (site of injury, number of operations, use of a drain). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guideline for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prehospital care - scoop and run or stay and play?

Improved training and expertise has enabled emergency medical personnel to provide advanced levels of care at the scene of trauma. While this could be expected to improve the outcome from major injury, current data does not support this. Indeed, prehospital interventions beyond the BLS level have not been shown to be effective and in many cases have proven to be detrimental to patient outcome. It is better to "scoop and run" than "stay and play". Current data relates to the urban environment where transport times to trauma centres are short and where it appears better to simply rapidly transport the patient to hospital than attempt major interventions at the scene. There may be more need for advanced techniques in the rural environment or where transport times are prolonged and certainly a need for more studies into subsets of patients who may benefit from interventions in the field.

Effect of ibuprofen on osteoblast differentiation of porcine bone marrow-derived progenitor cells.

PURPOSE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly prescribed to reduce inflammation and pain. However, little is known about the direct effect of these drugs on the differentiation of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells into osteoblasts. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ibuprofen on osteoblast differentiation and proliferation in a minipig model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow was aspirated from the minipig ilium, and porcine bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (pBMPCs) were isolated and expanded in standard culture medium. The pBMPCs were replated and differentiated into osteoblasts by use of osteogenic supplements (OS). Five groups were studied: negative control--pBMPCs in standard medium only; positive control--pBMPCs, standard culture medium, and OS; and 3 experimental groups--pBMPCs, standard culture medium, OS, and ibuprofen added in doses of 0.1, 1.0, and 3.0 mmol/L. Cell cultures were evaluated quantitatively by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) stain, von Kossa stain, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content. RESULTS: pBMPCs cultured with OS and low-dose ibuprofen (0.1 mmol/L) showed ALP stain, von Kossa stain, and DNA content similar to pBMPCs cultured in OS (positive control). pBMPCs cultured in higher doses of ibuprofen (1.0 and 3.0 mmol/L) produced significantly less positive staining of ALP and von Kossa and decreased DNA content. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that high-dose ibuprofen has a deleterious effect on pBMPC differentiation into osteoblasts whereas low-dose ibuprofen does not. The low dose of 0.1 mmol/L is the typical serum level when prescribed for clinical use.