Intraoperative Ergonomic Assessment of Exoscopes versus Conventional DIEP Flap.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the ergonomics of surgeons during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery using either baseline equipment (loupes, headlights, and an operating microscope) or an exoscope. Plastic surgeons may be at high risk of musculoskeletal problems. Recent studies indicate that adopting an exoscope may significantly improve surgeon postures and ergonomics. METHODS: Postural exposures, using inertial measurement units at the neck, torso, and shoulders, were calculated in addition to the surgeons' subjective physical and cognitive workload. An ergonomic risk score on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest) was calculated for each of the postures observed. Data from 23 bilateral DIEP flap surgeries (10 baseline and 13 exoscope) were collected. RESULTS: The neck and torso risk scores decreased significantly during abdominal flap harvest and chest dissection, while right shoulder risk scores increased during the abdominal flap harvest for exoscope DIEP flap procedures compared with. Exoscope anastomoses demonstrated higher neck, right shoulder, and left shoulder risk scores. The results from the survey for the "surgeon at abdomen" showed that the usage of exoscopes was associated with decreased performance and increased mental demand, temporal demand, and effort. However, the results from the "surgeon at chest" showed that the usage of exoscopes was associated with lower physical demand and fatigue, potentially due to differences in surgeon preference. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed some objective evidence for the ergonomic benefits of exoscope; however, this is dependent on the tasks the surgeon is performing. Additionally, personal preferences may be an important factor to be considered in the ergonomic evaluation of the exoscope.

Creating a Practical Transformational Change Management Model for Novel Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Technology Implementation in the Operating Room.

Objective: To identify change management (CM) strategies for implementing novel artificial intelligence and similar novel technologies in operating rooms and create a new CM model for future trials and applications inspired by the abovementioned strategies and established models. Methods: Key phases of technology implementation were defined, and strategies for transformational CM were created and applied in a recent CM experience at our institution between October 15, 2020 and October 15, 2021. We appraised existing CM models and propose the newly created model. Results: The key phases of the technology implementation were as follows: (1) team assembly; (2) committee approvals; (3) CM; and (4) system installation and go-live. Key strategies were (1) assemble team with necessary expertise; (2) anticipate potential institutional cultural and regulatory hurdles; (3) add agility to project planning and execution; (4) accommodate institutional culture and regulations; (5) early clinical partner buy-in and stakeholder engagement; and (6) consistent communication, all of which contributed to the new CM model creation. Conclusion: Key CM strategies and a new CM model addressing the unique needs and characteristics of operating room novel technology implementation were identified and created. The new model may be customized and tested for individual institution and project's needs and characteristics.

Course Design and Learning Outcomes of a Practical Online Ergonomics Course for Surgical Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Course content was designed and the learning outcomes assessed for an online ergonomics course for surgical residents. This course could fulfill an optional Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) curriculum on Surgical Ergonomics. DESIGN: The online course included five 5-minute modules within the residents' learning system, each ending with an ungraded knowledge question, and a final 5-question multiple-choice retention quiz that allowed infinite attempts. The course was designed by ergonomists and surgeons at a quaternary academic hospital system. Participants were given two weeks to complete the modules. An electronic survey with questions assessing ergonomics knowledge and understanding on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree - strongly agree) was distributed both before and after the course. The post-course survey included three additional questions to elicit feedback regarding learning experience and course design. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric paired comparisons were used to evaluate learning outcomes. SETTING: General surgery residency program at an academic medical center in the U.S. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two general surgery post graduate year 1 residents (PGY1s) were recruited to participate and completed the pre-course survey. Eight out of the 22 participants (36%) completed the online course and quiz; seven (32%) completed the course, quiz, and the post-course survey. RESULTS: Participants had high pre-course awareness of the importance of surgical ergonomics, benefits of work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) prevention, as well as awkward intraoperative postures being an WMSD risk factor. Participants' confidence increased significantly from pre- to post-course in ability to assess risk (p = 0.021), but not in ability or willingness to mitigate risky surgical postures. Participants who completed the quiz answered a median of 4 (IQR: [4, 5]) questions correctly. All participants indicated that they would recommend this course to other residents. CONCLUSIONS: These short practical ergonomics online learning modules increased surgical residents' confidence in assessing surgical WMSD risks.