A novel series of histamine H4 receptor antagonists based on the pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidine scaffold: comparison of hERG binding and target residence time with PF-3893787.

In this work we describe the optimization of a lead compound based on the quinazoline template to give a new series of potent pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidines as histamine H4 receptor antagonists. The pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidine ligands have significantly reduced hERG binding compared to clinical stage compound PF-3893787 while showing good affinities at the human and rodent histamine receptors. The receptor residence time of several of these new compounds was determined for the human H4R and compared with JNJ7777120 and PF-3893787. The pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidines showed residence times lower than JNJ7777120 but comparable to the residence time of PF-3893787. Overall, the pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidines show an excellent in vitro profile that warrants their further investigation in relevant models of human disease.

Detailed structure-activity relationship of indolecarboxamides as H4 receptor ligands.

A series of 76 derivatives of the indolecarboxamide 1 were synthesized, which allows a detailed SAR investigation of this well known scaffold. The data enable the definition of a predictive QSAR model which identifies several compounds with an activity comparable to 1. A selection of these new H(4)R antagonists was synthesized and a comparison of predicted and measured values demonstrates the robustness of the model (47-55). In addition to the H(4)-receptor activity general CMC and DMPK properties were investigated. Some of the new analogs are not only excellently soluble, but display a significantly increased half-life in mouse liver microsomes as well. These properties qualify these compounds as a possible new standard for future in vivo studies (e.g 51, 52 and 55). Moreover, the current studies also provide valuable information on the potential receptor ligand interactions between the indolcarboxamides and the H(4)R protein.

Effects of histamine H4 receptor ligands in a mouse model of gastric ulceration.

AIM: In the present study we examined whether histamine H(4) receptors (H(4)Rs) have a role in gastric ulcerogenesis using a mouse model of gastric damage. METHODS: The H(4)R antagonist JNJ7777120 and the H(4)R agonists VUF8430 and VUF10460 were investigated in fasted CD-1 mice against the ulcerogenic effect induced by co-administration of indomethacin(IND, 30 mg/kg s.c.) and bethanechol (BET, 5 mg/kg i.p.). Both macroscopic and histologic lesions were examined. Strain-related differences were investigated by testing JNJ7777120 also in NMRI, BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice. RESULTS: Neither JNJ7777120 nor the H(4)R agonists displayed effects in the normal stomach at any dose tested (10 and 30 mg/kg s.c.). As expected, IND+BET provoked several lesions in the fundic mucosa, which were significantly reduced by JNJ7777120 (10 and 30 mg/kg s.c.). The gastroprotective effect of JNJ7777120 (10 and 30 mg/kg s.c.) was observed in CD-1, NMRI and BALB/c, but not in C57BL/6J, mice. In CD-1 mice, the H(4)R agonists VUF8430 and VUF10460 (both at 10 and 30 mg/kg s.c.) did not modify the damage induced by IND+BET, however VUF8430 (10 mg/kg s.c.) prevented the gastroprotection induced by JNJ7777120 (10 mg/kg s.c.). CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained with selective ligands suggest that the H(4)R may have a role in mouse gastric ulcerogenesis. If confirmed in humans, these data would emphasize the potential advantage of H(4)R blockers as gastrosparing anti-inflammatory drugs. The lack of effects of JNJ7777120 in C57BL/6J mice has to be carefully considered in the pharmacological characterization of H(4)R functions and/or new selective ligands.

Ligand based design of novel histamine H4 receptor antagonists; fragment optimization and analysis of binding kinetics.

The histamine H(4) receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor that has attracted much interest for its role in inflammatory and immunomodulatory functions. In our search for new H(4)R ligands, a low affinity isoquinoline fragment was optimized to 7-(furan-2-yl)-4-(piperazin-1-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (VUF11489), as a new H(4)R antagonist. Analysis of its binding kinetics at the human H(4)R showed this compound to have a very different dissociative half-life in comparison with reference antagonist JNJ7777120.

Strain-dependent effects of the histamine H4 receptor antagonist JNJ7777120 in a murine model of acute skin inflammation.

The effects of the histamine H(4) receptor antagonist JNJ7777120 were evaluated in a model of acute skin inflammation induced by local application of croton oil. The influence of strain on the effect of JNJ7777120 was investigated in four different mouse strains (CD-1, NMRI, BALB/c and C57BL/6J). In CD-1 mice, JNJ777720 (30-100 mg/kg subcutaneously, s.c.) exerted a dose-dependent inhibition of croton oil-induced ear inflammation and polymorphonuclear leucocyte infiltration, as confirmed by histological evaluation of ear tissues. JNJ7777120 (30-100 mg/kg) did not reduce ear oedema in NMRI, BALB/c or C57BL/6J mice. The positive control, dexamethasone (2 mg/kg s.c.) induced significant anti-inflammatory effects only in CD-1 and NMRI mice. In these strains, also the histamine H(1) -receptor blocker pyrilamine (30 mg/kg s.c.) significantly reduced ear oedema at 2 h after croton oil challenge, being as effective as JNJ7777120 in CD-1 mice. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the H(4) receptor antagonist JNJ7777120 may reduce acute croton oil-induced skin inflammation as effectively as H(1) receptor blockade. However, present experiments evidenced for the first time marked strain-related differences in the JNJ7777120 pharmacological activity, which have to be carefully considered when using this ligand to characterize histamine H(4) receptor functions in murine models and translating preclinical data to clinical human settings.

Selective histamine H3 and H4 receptor agonists exert opposite effects against the gastric lesions induced by HCl in the rat stomach.

The present study investigated the role of histamine H(3) and H(4) receptors in gastric mucosal defense, by the use of selective ligands. Firstly, the affinities of several histaminergic agonists for the rat histamine H(3) and H(4) receptors were checked in HEK 293T cells transfected with either receptor subtype. Next, functional activities were determined in conscious rat against the ulcerogenic effect of 0.6N HCl. Radioligand binding studies showed that immethridine and methimepip were the most selective agonists at rat H(3) receptors, whereas VUF10460 displayed approximately a 50-fold selectivity for the rat H(4) receptor over the H(3) receptor. In conscious rats, immethridine and methimepip significantly reduced (66% and 48% inhibition, respectively) the gastric lesions induced by HCl; the effect of immethridine was antagonized by the H(3) receptor antagonist A-331440, but not by the H(4) receptor antagonist JNJ7777120. The mixed H(3)/H(4) receptor agonist immepip induced a significant aggravation of HCl damage, which was prevented by JNJ7777120; HCl-induced lesions were also significantly enhanced by the H(4) receptor agonists VUF10460 and VUF8430; however, this effect was not modified by JNJ7777120. Overall, this study indicates that, whereas the histamine H(3) receptor is involved in the protection of rat stomach against concentrated HCl, the functional role of the H(4) receptor is still to be defined, although selective agonists induce proulcerogenic effects under HCl challenge. Finally, the species-dependent variations in affinity and receptor selectivity observed for most ligands need to be carefully addressed in the pharmacological characterization of histamine H(3) and H(4) receptor functions in vivo.

Fragment library screening reveals remarkable similarities between the G protein-coupled receptor histamine H4 and the ion channel serotonin 5-HT3A.

A fragment library was screened against the G protein-coupled histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) and the ligand-gated ion channel serotonin 5-HT(3A) (5-HT(3A)R). Interestingly, significant overlap was found between H(4)R and 5-HT(3A)R hit sets. The data indicates that dual active H(4)R and 5 HT(3A)R fragments have a higher complexity than the selective compounds which has important implications for chemical genomics approaches. The results of our fragment-based library screening study illustrate similarities in ligand recognition between H(4)R and 5-HT(3A)R and have important consequences for selectivity profiling in ongoing drug discovery efforts on H(4)R and 5-HT(3A)R. The affinity profiles of our fragment screening studies furthermore match the chemical properties of the H(4)R and 5-HT(3A)R binding sites and can be used to define molecular interaction fingerprints to guide the in silico prediction of protein-ligand interactions and structure.

Triazole ligands reveal distinct molecular features that induce histamine H4 receptor affinity and subtly govern H4/H3 subtype selectivity.

The histamine H(3) (H(3)R) and H(4) (H(4)R) receptors attract considerable interest from the medicinal chemistry community. Given their relatively high homology yet widely differing therapeutic promises, ligand selectivity for the two receptors is crucial. We interrogated H(4)R/H(3)R selectivities using ligands with a [1,2,3]triazole core. Cu(I)-assisted "click chemistry" was used to assemble diverse [1,2,3]triazole compounds (6a-w and 7a-f), many containing a peripheral imidazole group. The imidazole ring posed some problems in the click chemistry putatively due to Cu(II) coordination, but Boc protection of the imidazole and removal of oxygen from the reaction mixture provided effective strategies. Pharmacological studies revealed two monosubstituted imidazoles (6h,p) with <10 nM H(4)R affinities and >10-fold H(4)R/H(3)R selectivity. Both compounds possess a cycloalkylmethyl group and appear to target a lipophilic pocket in H(4)R with high steric precision. The use of the [1,2,3]triazole scaffold is further demonstrated by the notion that simple changes in spacer length or peripheral groups can reverse the selectivity toward H(3)R. Computational evidence is provided to account for two key selectivity switches and to pinpoint a lipophilic pocket as an important handle for H(4)R over H(3)R selectivity.

Synthesis and QSAR of quinazoline sulfonamides as highly potent human histamine H4 receptor inverse agonists.

Hit optimization of the class of quinazoline containing histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) ligands resulted in a sulfonamide substituted analogue with high affinity for the H(4)R. This moiety leads to improved physicochemical properties and is believed to probe a distinct H(4)R binding pocket that was previously identified using pharmacophore modeling. By introducing a variety of sulfonamide substituents, the H(4)R affinity was optimized. The interaction of the new ligands, in combination with a set of previously published quinazoline compounds, was described by a QSAR equation. Pharmacological studies revealed that the sulfonamide analogues have excellent H(4)R affinity and behave as inverse agonists at the human H(4)R. In vivo evaluation of the potent 2-(6-chloro-2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinazoline-4-amino)-N-phenylethanesulfonamide (54) (pK(i) = 8.31 +/- 0.10) revealed it to have anti-inflammatory activity in an animal model of acute inflammation.

A new generation of anti-histamines: Histamine H4 receptor antagonists on their way to the clinic.

At the turn of the millennium, the DNA sequence encoding the histamine H4 receptor (H4R) was identified in data from human genome databases. Considering the clinical importance of H1R and H2R ligands, and the clinical trials that are ongoing for H3R ligands, the latest addition to the histamine receptor family was noted with interest by the pharmaceutical industry. Initial studies describing the expression of the H4R, and the activity of this receptor in (patho)physiology, suggested that the H4R played a role in the immune system. The introduction of the reference H4R antagonist JNJ-7777120 (Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC/Abbott Laboratories), and proof of the efficacy of this agent in models of asthma, allergic rhinitis and pruritus, highlighted the H4R as a novel drug target. The first clinical candidates targeting the H4R have been identified, and new H4R antagonists are expected to enter the clinic in the near future.

Clobenpropit analogs as dual activity ligands for the histamine H3 and H4 receptors: synthesis, pharmacological evaluation, and cross-target QSAR studies.

Previous studies have demonstrated that clobenpropit (N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-S-[3-(4(5)-imidazolyl)propyl]isothiourea) binds to both the human histamine H(3) receptor (H(3)R) and H(4) receptor (H(4)R). In this paper, we describe the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a series of clobenpropit analogs, which vary in the functional group adjacent to the isothiourea moiety in order to study structural requirements for H(3)R and H(4)R ligands. The compounds show moderate to high affinity for both the human H(3)R and H(4)R. Furthermore, the changes in the functional group attached to the isothiourea moiety modulate the intrinsic activity of the ligands at the H(4)R, ranging from neutral antagonism to full agonism. QSAR models have been generated in order to explain the H(3)R and H(4)R affinities.

Major advances in the development of histamine H4 receptor ligands.

The search for new and potent histamine H4 receptor ligands is leading to a steadily increasing number of scientific publications and patent applications. Several interesting and structurally diverse compounds have been found, but fierce IP competition for a preferred 2-aminopyrimidine scaffold is becoming apparent. Recent investigations into the role of the histamine H(4)R in (patho)physiology and the use of H4R ligands in in vivo disease models reveal enormous potential in the field of inflammation and allergy, among others. The development of ligands that display activity at two or more histamine receptor (HR) subtypes is another clinical opportunity that is currently being explored. Taken together, the histamine H4R field is gearing up for clinical studies and has the potential to deliver another generation of blockbuster drugs.

Pharmacological characterization of the new histamine H4 receptor agonist VUF 8430.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We compare the pharmacological profiles of a new histamine H4 receptor agonist 2-(2-guanidinoethyl)isothiourea (VUF 8430) with that of a previously described H4 receptor agonist, 4-methylhistamine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Radioligand binding and functional assays were performed using histamine H4 receptors expressed in mammalian cell lines. Compounds were also evaluated ex vivo in monocyte-derived dendritic cells endogenously expressing H4 receptors and in vivo in anaesthetized rats for gastric acid secretion activity. KEY RESULTS: Both VUF 8430 and 4-methylhistamine were full agonists at human H4 receptors with lower affinity at rat and mouse H4 receptors. Both compounds induced chemotaxis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. VUF 8430 also showed reasonable affinity and was a full agonist at the H3 receptor. Agmatine is a metabolite of arginine, structurally related to VUF 8430, and was a H4 receptor agonist with micromolar affinity. At histamine H3 receptors, agmatine was a full agonist, whereas 4-methylhistamine was an agonist only at high concentrations. Both VUF 8430 and agmatine were inactive at H1 and H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine is as active as histamine at H2 receptors. In vivo, VUF 8430 only caused a weak secretion of gastric acid mediated by H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine, dimaprit, histamine and amthamine, at equimolar doses, induced 2.5- to 6-fold higher output than VUF 8430. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest complementary use of 4-methylhistamine and VUF 8430 as H4 receptor agonists. Along with H4 receptor antagonists, both agonists can serve as useful pharmacological tools in studies of histamine H4 receptors.

Discovery of quinazolines as histamine H4 receptor inverse agonists using a scaffold hopping approach.

From a series of small fragments that was designed to probe the histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R), we previously described quinoxaline-containing fragments that were grown into high affinity H(4)R ligands in a process that was guided by pharmacophore modeling. With a scaffold hopping exercise and using the same in silico models, we now report the identification and optimization of a series of quinazoline-containing H(4)R compounds. This approach led to the discovery of 6-chloro-N-(furan-3-ylmethyl)2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinazolin-4-amine (VUF10499, 54) and 6-chloro-2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-N-(thiophen-2-ylmethyl)quinazolin-4-amine (VUF10497, 55) as potent human H(4)R inverse agonists (pK(i) = 8.12 and 7.57, respectively). Interestingly, both compounds also possess considerable affinity for the human histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) and therefore represent a novel class of dual action H(1)R/H(4)R ligands, a profile that potentially leads to added therapeutic benefit. Compounds from this novel series of quinazolines are antagonists at the rat H(4)R and were found to possess anti-inflammatory properties in vivo in the rat.

Delineation of agonist binding to the human histamine H4 receptor using mutational analysis, homology modeling, and ab initio calculations.

A three-dimensional homology model of the human histamine H 4 receptor was developed to investigate the binding mode of a series of structurally diverse H 4-agonists, i.e. histamine, clozapine, and the recently described selective, nonimidazole agonist VUF 8430. Mutagenesis studies and docking of these ligands in a rhodopsin-based homology model revealed two essential points of interactions in the binding pocket, i.e. Asp3.32 and Glu5.46 (Ballesteros-Weinstein numbering system). It is postulated that Asp3.32 interacts in its anionic state, whereas Glu5.46 interacts in its neutral form. The hypothesis was tested with the point mutations D3.32N and E5.46Q. For the D3.32N no binding affinity toward any of the ligands could be detected. This is in sharp contrast to the E5.46Q mutant, which discriminates between various ligands. The affinity of histamine-like ligands was decreased approximately a 1000-fold, whereas the affinity of all other ligands remained virtually unchanged. The proposed model for agonist binding as well as ab initio calculations for histamine and VUF 8430 explain the observed differences in binding to the H 4R mutants. These studies provide a molecular understanding for the action of a variety of H 4 receptor-ligands. The resulting H 4 receptor model will be the basis for the development of new H 4 receptor-ligands.

Fragment based design of new H4 receptor-ligands with anti-inflammatory properties in vivo.

Using a previously reported flexible alignment model we have designed, synthesized, and evaluated a series of compounds at the human histamine H 4 receptor (H 4R) from which 2-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-quinoxaline ( 3) was identified as a new lead structure for H 4R ligands. Exploration of the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of this scaffold led to the identification of 6,7-dichloro 3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinoxalin-2(1 H)-one (VUF 10214, 57) and 2-benzyl-3-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)quinoxaline (VUF 10148, 20) as potent H 4R ligands with nanomolar affinities. In vivo studies in the rat reveal that compound 57 has significant anti-inflammatory properties in the carrageenan-induced paw-edema model.

Discovery of S-(2-guanidylethyl)-isothiourea (VUF 8430) as a potent nonimidazole histamine H4 receptor agonist.

During an in-house database screen, we identified S-(2-guanidylethyl)-isothiourea as a high affinity agonist for the histamine H4 receptor, with a 33-fold selectivity over the histamine H3 receptor and negligible affinity for the other histamine receptor subtypes. This nonimidazole ligand is introduced as a useful and complementary pharmacological tool that enables further unraveling of the physiological roles of the H4 receptor.

The emerging role of the histamine H4 receptor in anti-inflammatory therapy.

Antagonists for the Histamine H(1) receptor have been on the market for decades and continue to be successfully used in the treatment of a variety of allergic conditions. The recently discovered histamine H(4) receptor subtype is emerging as a new and complementary target for treating inflammatory conditions. In this review, we describe the receptor protein, its putative role in (patho)physiology and the latest ligands that are being developed to explore the feasibility of the H(4) receptor as a drug target.

Characterization of the histamine H4 receptor binding site. Part 1. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of dibenzodiazepine derivatives.

A series of dibenzodiazepine derivatives was synthesized to probe the binding site of the recently discovered histamine H4 receptor (H4R). Optimization of the lead structure clozapine (2) resulted in (E)-7-chloro-11-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepine (7j), a potent H4R agonist (H4R, pKi = 7.6). Pharmacological data suggests that the series of nonimidazole compounds can be used to describe the orthosteric binding site of the H4R because both 2 and 7j displace [3H]histamine in a competitive manner. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the effects of 7j are competitively antagonized by the selective H4R antagonist JNJ 7777120 (1), indicating considerable overlap of their binding sites. On the basis of the derived structure-activity relationships and additional pharmacological results, a pharmacophore model was constructed, which will be the premise for the design of novel H4R ligands.