Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Air Med J ; 40(6): 415-418, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34794781

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Hospital mergers have made interhospital transfers necessary in the consolidation of medical services. Physicians must make decisions on the level of interfacility transport modalities (ITMs). We sought to assess physician knowledge of and comfort with ITMs. METHODS: A survey was e-mailed to 2,510 physicians in a health care system. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The mean and median Likert values were calculated overall. Similar calculations were performed for emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) and critical care physicians (CCPs). These calculations were compared with those for noncritical care physicians (NCCPs) using the t-test and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Of the 181 physicians who responded, 169 physicians identified a specialty. Sixty-nine were EMPs/CCPs, whereas 100 were NCCPs. The mean and median Likert values were statistically significantly higher for EMPs/CCPs compared with NCCPs (P < .0001) in the areas of knowledge of ITMs, comfort in choosing ITMs, and knowledge in choosing ground versus air critical care transport (CCT). The most important factor for using ground or air CCT was patient stability. Sixty percent believed air CCT to be faster than ground. CONCLUSION: EMPs/CCPs seem to be more comfortable with ITMs than NCCPs. Further research should evaluate whether educational interventions lead to a more appropriate use of ITMs.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Médicos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...