Malignant risk of pediatric Bethesda category III thyroid nodules subcategorized by nuclear atypia and other: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: The 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) divides AUS diagnoses into two major subcategories: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) nuclear atypia (AUS-N) and other (AUS-O). This study aims to compare the histological outcome and malignant rate of pediatric AUS thyroid nodules classified into AUS-N and AUS-O subcategories. DESIGN: A search of our institutional electronic pathology database for the period from January 2012 to July 2023 was conducted to identify pediatric (<21 years old) thyroid nodules that were interpreted as AUS and subsequently had surgery. Cases were further divided into AUS-N and AUS-O subcategories. Results of follow-up surgical resections were collected. The malignant rate was calculated and compared between AUS-N and AUS-O groups. RESULTS: The study identified 62 thyroid nodules from 58 pediatric patients. Among these nodules, 29 and 33 were subcategorized as AUS-N and AUS-O, respectively. Both groups exhibited a female predominance and displayed a similar nodule size distribution. Histological analysis revealed 15 carcinomas in AUS-N nodules, including 11 cases of classic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and four cases of follicular type of PTC. In contrast, in the AUS-O group, a total of five carcinomas were documented, including two PTCs and three oncocytic thyroid carcinomas. Notably, the malignant rate of AUS-N nodules (52%) is significantly higher than that of AUS-O nodules (15%) (p = .002). CONCLUSION: In pediatric AUS thyroid nodules, the malignant risk in AUS-N is significantly higher than that in AUS-O. These findings may guide more appropriate clinical triage and/or improve management of pediatric patients with AUS thyroid nodules.

Performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization in biliary brushings with equivocal cytology: an institutional experience.

INTRODUCTION: Biliary brushing (BB) cytology has a sensitivity of 15%-65% and specificity approaching 100% for detecting malignancy. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using the UroVysion probe set has been advocated to enhance the detection of malignancies with reported sensitivity of 43%-84%. We sought to evaluate the performance of FISH in BB with equivocal cytology at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with atypical and suspicious BB with concurrent diagnostic FISH performed at our institution from 2014 to 2021 were identified through a query of our pathology database. FISH (using UroVysion probe set containing centromere enumeration probes to chromosomes 3, 7, and 17) was positive if at least 5 cells demonstrated polysomy. Electronic medical records were reviewed for pathology results and outcomes. Patients were classified malignant if they had positive pathology or documented clinical impression of malignancy and benign if they had negative pathology and/or documented benign clinical course for at least 12 months. RESULTS: We identified 254 equivocal BB (238 atypical/16 suspicious) with concurrent FISH results from 191 patients (105 benign, 86 malignant). 12% (22/191) of patients were FISH positive. Twenty-four percent (21/86) of patients with malignancy had positive FISH but were nonspecific for pancreaticobiliary/ampullary adenocarcinomas. Almost all positive FISH were associated with malignancy (21/22; 95%). There was 1 positive FISH in a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis who had a benign outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The small number of positive FISH results in BB with equivocal cytology raises the question of the optimal criteria for malignancy. Using only polysomy could result in lower sensitivity.

Comparative expression of TRPS1, GATA3, SOX10, mammaglobin, and GCDFP-15 in effusion specimens with breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) for breast carcinomas has shown low detection rates of metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) in effusions. Although GATA3 has enhanced diagnostic accuracy in this realm, its limited utility in detecting triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) has been highlighted. TRPS1 has been introduced as a potentially sensitive and specific marker in detecting MBC on histologic samples. We investigate the utility of TRPS1 as a marker for MBC in effusion specimens and compare its performance to SOX10, GATA3, mammaglobin (MG), and GCDFP-15. METHODS: A database search identified malignant effusions involved by MBC between 2013 and 2021. Cases from unique patients with sufficient cellularity were evaluated for TRPS1, GATA3, SOX10, MG, and GCDFP-15 IHC. The intensity and extent of tumor cells (TC) were scored by two pathologists. Any discrepancies were jointly reviewed for consensus. RESULTS: GATA3 showed the highest rate of positivity (98.2%), followed by TRPS1 (89.5%), MG (43.9%), GCDFP-15 (21.1%), and SOX10 (3.5%). All GATA3-positive cases showed intermediate to high expression. Comparatively, TRPS1 showed more variability in staining extent and intensity. In 13 (22.8%) cases, TRPS1 showed extensive background staining of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Of six TNBCs, GATA3, and TRPS1 were positive in six (100%) and four (66.7%) cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While TRPS1 shows a lower detection rate for MBC than GATA-3, using a combination of these markers can enhance effusion cytology's performance in detecting MBC. However, variability in TRPS1 staining intensity and high background TRPS1 staining of inflammatory and mesothelial cells can increase difficulty in its evaluation.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier and histopathological outcome in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: Initial versus repeat fine-needle aspiration.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data comparing the performance of Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) in thyroid nodules carrying an initial versus a repeat diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). This study reported an institutional experience in this regard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive thyroid nodules that had an initial or a repeat AUS diagnosis and had a subsequent GSC diagnostic result (benign or suspicious) from 2017 to 2021. All nodules were followed by surgical intervention or by clinical and/or ultrasound monitoring. GSC's benign call rate (BCR), rate of histology-proven malignancy associated with a suspicious GSC result, and diagnostic parameters of GSC were calculated and compared between the two cohorts (initial versus repeat AUS). Statistical significance was defined with a p-value of <.05 for all analysis. RESULTS: A total of 202 cases fulfilled inclusion criteria, including 67 and 135 thyroid nodules with an initial and a repeat AUS diagnosis, respectively. BCR was 67% and 66% in initial and repeat AUS cohorts, respectively. Rate of histology-proven malignancy associated with a suspicious GSC result were 22% and 24% in initial and repeat AUS cohorts, respectively. Compared with the repeat AUS cohort, the initial AUS cohort showed slightly lower sensitivity (83% vs. 100%), specificity (70% vs. 73%), PPV (23% vs. 24%), NPV (98% vs. 100%), and diagnostic accuracy (72% vs. 75%). Nevertheless, these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: GSC demonstrated comparable performance in thyroid nodules with a repeat AUS diagnosis versus nodules with an initial AUS diagnosis.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier and histopathological outcome are associated with patterns of atypia in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Data on Afirma's genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) performance in atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) subcategories is limited. This study investigated GSC performance in AUS nodules with architectural atypia (AUS-A), cytological atypia (AUS-C), architectural and cytological atypia (AUS-AC), and predominantly Hürthle cells (AUS-HC). METHODS: This study retrieved consecutive thyroid nodules having a recurrent cytologic diagnosis of AUS with qualifiers and a concurrent GSC diagnostic result. All nodules were followed by either surgical intervention or clinical and/or ultrasound monitoring (≥6 months). GSC benign call rate (BCR), rate of histology-proven malignancy, and diagnostic parameters of GSC were calculated for individual AUS subcategories. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 135 AUS nodules fulfilled inclusion criteria, including 79 AUS-A, 9 AUS-C, 29 AUS-AC, and 18 AUS-HC. BCR was 72.2%, 66.7%, 44.8%, and 77.8% in AUS-A, AUS-C, AUS-AC, and AUS-HC, respectively. AUS-A showed a greater BCR than AUS-AC (p < .05). All GSC-benign nodules were considered benign on clinical or surgical follow-up. Among GSC-suspicious nodules, histology-proven malignancies represented 4.5% of AUS-A, 0% of AUS-C, 56.3% of AUS-AC, and 25.0% of AUS-HC cases. AUS-AC demonstrated a higher malignant rate compared with AUS-A (p < .05). GSC offers 100% NPV and a wide range (5%-56%) of PPV across all AUS subcategories. AUS-AC demonstrated a greater PPV compared with AUS-A (p < .05). CONCLUSION: BCR of GSC and malignant rates associated with suspicious GSC may differ in various AUS subcategories. GSC-suspicious nodules with both architectural and cytologic atypia are more likely to be malignant. These findings may improve clinical triage and/or management of patients with AUS thyroid nodules.

Comparison of Diagnostic Rates and Concordance with Subsequent Surgical Resections between Conventional Smear and ThinPrep Preparations versus ThinPrep Only in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration (T-FNA) Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid fine needle aspiration (T-FNA) is a mainstay in management of thyroid nodules. However, the preparation of T-FNA specimens varies across institutions. Prior studies have compared diagnostic rates between different specimen preparations of T-FNA specimens and their associated advantages and disadvantages. However, few have compared the rates of all diagnostic categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) between liquid-based preparations (LBPs) and a combination of LBP and conventional smear (CS) preparations. Our study compares TBSRTC diagnostic rates between these 2 cohorts and correlates cytologic diagnoses with subsequent thyroid resections to evaluate rates of neoplasia (RON) and malignancy (ROM). METHODS: 584 consecutive thyroid FNA specimens were collected and stratified by preparation type (ThinPrep [TP] vs. CS & TP). Diagnostic rates for each TBSRTC diagnostic category were calculated. The institution's electronic medical records database was searched for histologic diagnoses of previously sampled thyroid nodules to evaluate the RON and ROM. RESULTS: Of 584 thyroid FNA specimens, 73 (12.5%) and 511 (87.5%) were evaluated by TP only and CS & TP, respectively, reflecting the predominance of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with CS for T-FNAs at our institution. Of the TP only and CS & TP cohorts, 29 (39.7%) and 98 (19.2%) had subsequent resections, respectively. The frequency of non-diagnostic cases was lower in the CS & TP cohort (12.7% vs. 26%). While the diagnostic rate of follicular lesion of undetermined significance was similar for both cohorts, SFN categorization was only utilized in the CS & TP cohort (1.5% vs. 0%). Although RON and ROM were similar between cohorts in many of the TBSRTC categories, there was a higher RON associated with non-diagnostic specimens in the TP only cohort when the denominator included all non-diagnostic cases. CONCLUSION: The combination of CS and LBP may potentially decrease the non-diagnostic rate of T-FNA specimens as well as the number of passes required for diagnosis, particularly with ROSE. Evaluation of morphologic features highlighted in conventional smears may facilitate diagnostic categorization in the "suspicious for follicular neoplasm" category.

Quantitative Image Analysis as an Adjunct to Manual Scoring of ER, PgR, and HER2 in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Biomarker expression evaluation for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an essential prognostic and predictive parameter for breast cancer and critical for guiding hormonal and neoadjuvant therapy. This study compared quantitative image analysis (QIA) with pathologists' scoring for ER, PgR, and HER2. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 1,367 invasive breast carcinomas, including all histopathology subtypes, for which ER, PgR, and HER2 were analyzed by manual scoring and QIA. The resulting scores were compared, and in a subset of HER2 cases (n = 373, 26%), scores were correlated with available fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results. RESULTS: Concordance between QIA and manual scores for ER, PgR, and HER2 was 93%, 96%, and 90%, respectively. Discordant cases had low positive scores (1%-10%) for ER (n = 33), were due to nonrepresentative region selection (eg, ductal carcinoma in situ) or tumor heterogeneity for PgR (n = 43), and were of one-step difference (negative to equivocal, equivocal to positive, or vice versa) for HER2 (n = 90). Among HER2 cases where FISH results were available, only four (1.0%) showed discordant QIA and FISH results. CONCLUSIONS: QIA is a computer-aided diagnostic support tool for pathologists. It significantly improves ER, PgR, and HER2 scoring standardization. QIA demonstrated excellent concordance with pathologists' scores. To avoid pitfalls, pathologist oversight of representative region selection is recommended.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier vs gene expression classifier in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: An institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is an adjunct to thyroid fine needle aspiration shown to improve pre-operative risk assessment and reduce unnecessary surgery of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) is a newer version aiming to improve specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of Afirma testing. There are limited studies comparing GSC vs GEC. This study was undertaken to compare these classifiers in terms of diagnostic performance and effect on clinical management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with thyroid nodules that had a recurrent cytologic diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and were tested by either GEC or GSC. Patient demographics, nodule size, and clinical follow-up were recorded. Benign call rate (BCR) of Afirma testing, rate of subsequent surgery (RSS), rate of histology-confirmed malignancy (RHM), as well as diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predicative value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated and compared between GSC and GEC cohorts. RESULTS: Among 264 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules, 127 and 137 were tested with GEC and GSC, respectively. Compared to GEC, GSC demonstrated increased BCR (77.3% vs 52%), decreased RSS (31.4% vs 51.2%), greater RHM (29% vs 9.8%) associated with a suspicious Afirma result, as well as improved specificity (82.8% vs 54.5%), PPV (29% vs 9.8%), and diagnostic accuracy (83.9% vs 56.7%), while maintaining high sensitivity and NPV. CONCLUSION: Afirma GSC substantially improved BCR, RSS, RHM, and diagnostic performance, enhancing appropriate triage and thereby helped avoid unnecessary surgery in AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules.

An institutional experience: A retrospective analysis of the effect of transitioning from follicular lesion of undetermined significance to atypia of undetermined significance with subclassified atypia on interobserver concordance, rates of neoplasia, and rates of malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNA) classified under "atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), including Hürthle cell type (HLUS)" category of The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) in literature is highly variable. The 2018 TBSRTC was updated to note a preferred categorization of AUS cases into subcategories. This study evaluates the impact of AUS subclassification on rates of neoplasia (RON), rates of malignancy (ROM), and cytopathologist (CP) concordance. METHODS: 93 thyroid FNAs previously diagnosed as FLUS or HLUS from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014 with subsequent surgical resection were identified. Four CPs reclassified these cases using TBSRTC AUS subcategories of follicular cells with architectural and/or cytologic atypia, predominantly Hürthle cells, and atypical lymphocytes. RON and ROM were calculated for each diagnostic subcategory for each CP. RESULTS: The original RON and ROM for FLUS cases were 31.4% and 15.1% and were 77.8% and 22.2% for HLUS cases. 10.8% of cases showed diagnostic concordance amongst the four CPs. The most frequently utilized subcategory was architectural atypia. RON ranges for architectural atypia, cytologic atypia, architectural and cytologic atypia, and predominantly Hürthle cells were 28.1% to 35.7%, 0% to 33.3%, 35.3% to 66.7%, and 57.1% to 87.5%. The range of ROM was 13.9% to 16.7%, 0% to 33%, 0% to 42.9%, and 0% to 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RON for AUS predominantly Hürthle cells subcategory was higher than previously reported, which may indicate use for tailored patient management pathways. AUS subclassification can result in significant interobserver variability. Therefore, institutions may consider consensus/quality control sessions to optimize diagnostic concordance.

Gender Disparity in Referral for Definitive Care of Malignant Pleural Effusions.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities exist in cancer care. Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) carry a poor prognosis and are managed by different physicians. This study sought to evaluate referral patterns and gender differences for definitive treatment and outcomes of MPE patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with MPE from 1999 to 2015 at a quaternary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed to obtain patient history, referral to thoracic surgery for definitive management, and outcomes. Analysis was performed using chi-squared/Fisher's exact test, logistic regression models, and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 224/686 patients (32.7%) were referred to thoracic surgery. No survival difference existed between referral and nonreferral groups or referred patients who received or did not receive pleurodesis. 405 patients (59.0%) were women. Women were statistically significantly less likely to be referred than men (27.9% versus 39.5%, P = 0.0014). This disparity persisted when comorbidities were controlled for (P = 0.0004) and when gynecologic cancers (e.g., uterine, ovarian, but not including breast; 55 female patients) were excluded from analysis (28.9% versus 39.5%, P = 0.0049). Women had statistically significantly more thoracenteses (3.34 versus 2.19, P < 0.0001) and improved survival compared with males (median survival = 136 d versus 54; P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Gender disparity exists in referral patterns for definitive management of MPE; women are less likely to be referred than men. Women have longer survival and a greater number of thoracenteses performed, despite a lower referral rate for definitive care. Further research is needed to understand the differences in referral rates and outcomes between men and women.

"Equivocal" high-risk HPV DNA tests performed on ThinPrep specimens after ASC-US diagnoses are associated with an increased incidence of CIN3: a cytologic/histologic review of 315 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The Hybrid Capture II high-risk HPV test (HC II hrHPVT) improves early detection of cervical neoplasia in Pap tests. However, weakly positive HC II results may be reported as indeterminate or "equivocal," for which there is little clinical guidance. This study is designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of equivocal HC II hrHPVTs and concurrent atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) on ThinPrep Pap specimens through correlation with 2-year follow-up cervical biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period, ThinPrep Pap tests diagnosed as ASC-US were grouped according to their hrHPVT results (i.e., positive, negative, or equivocal) and correlated with histologic follow-up. All equivocal and representative positive and negative hrHPVTs were included. Biopsies showing high-grade dysplasia were reviewed by two pathologists. RESULTS: Of 9,012 ASCUS Pap tests, 945 had corresponding hrHPVTs and follow-up cervical biopsies. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL-cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2/3, CIN2/3) was identified in 20.3% (14/69) of biopsies after equivocal hrHPVTs (CIN2-5.8%, CIN3-14.5% (p=.0261); 16.7% (25/150) after positive hrHPVT (CIN2-12%, CIN3-4.7%); and 5.4% (5/93) of biopsies after negative hrHPVT (CIN2-4.3%, CIN3-1.1%). CONCLUSION: ASC-US in association with equivocal and positive HC II results respectively shows similar incidences of CIN2/3 on 2-year follow-up cervical biopsy. Additionally, a significant proportion of CIN3 biopsies are in the equivocal HC II cohort. As clinical decision making would be impacted by this finding, laboratories should consider evaluating the clinical performance of their HC II assay via correlation with subsequent cervical biopsies.

The impact of using the Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytology diagnostic criteria on the follicular lesion of undetermined significance category.

INTRODUCTION: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) refines the definition of and provides specific diagnostic criteria for the category of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). This study was conducted to review our institutional experience with thyroid nodules interpreted as FLUS using TBSRTC diagnostic criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A SNOMED (Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine) search of the electronic pathology database in our institution for the period of January 2011 to June 2012 was conducted to identify thyroid aspirates previously interpreted as FLUS using TBSRTC diagnostic criteria. All cases were followed for at least 6 months. Follow-up information including clinical/imaging monitoring, repeat fine-needle aspiration, and/or subsequent surgical intervention, along with the corresponding cytologic diagnosis and/or histologic diagnosis were collected for each case. Cytology-histology concordance was evaluated for aspirates with surgical follow-up. RESULTS: We identified a total of 122 FLUS cases and follow-up information was available in 100 cases. Among the 100 cases, 31 appeared clinically stable and showed no size change on ultrasonographic imaging; 9 were reclassified as benign non-neoplastic by a repeat fine-needle aspiration; and 60 received surgical treatments. The follow-up histology revealed 26.7% (16 of 60) papillary thyroid carcinoma, 25% (15 of 60) follicular adenoma, and 48.3% (29 of 60) non-neoplastic nodules (nodular hyperplasia or lymphocytic thyroiditis). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with historical control subjects from our institution, the current study demonstrates that adhering to TBSRTC diagnostic criteria yields a higher prediction of histology-proven neoplasia (25% versus 14.9%) and malignancy (26.7% versus 9.2%) for the FLUS category.

Restoring satisfactory status in ThinPrep Pap test specimens with too few squamous cells and containing microscopic red blood cells.

Treatment of specimens that contain excessive blood can effectively reduce the unsatisfactory rate; however, a considerable number of unsatisfactory specimens remain. We evaluated the effectiveness of reprocessing unsatisfactory specimens that had too few squamous cells and contained microscopic red blood cells (TFSQRBC).Out of the 688 unsatisfactory specimens at microscopic screening, 197 (28.63%) were TFSQRBC that were reprocessed by treatment of glacial acetic acid (GAA). Red blood cells were observed clogging the pores in the filter of the ThinPrep device. After reprocessing, 129 (68.48%) yielded a satisfactory diagnosis, which accounted for a reduction of the unsatisfactory rate by 18.25%. In the restored satisfactory specimens, abnormal diagnoses of 1 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (0.78%), 3 atypical glandular cells (AGC) (2.33%), and 13 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (10.08%) were made. The abnormal diagnoses in this group of patients were significantly higher than that in the general population screened.Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep (TP) specimens of TFSQRBC can reduce the unsatisfactory rate of the TP Pap test significantly and is a cost-effective measure. The initially unsatisfactory specimens are more likely to represent cases with an abnormal diagnosis, which also justifies the effort of reprocessing this group of specimens. Adjustment of the pore size on the ThinPrep filter device may reduce the interference of red blood cells.