RESUMO
We describe a case of a 43-year old woman with Marfan's syndrome, tricuspid valve regurgitation and severe pectus excavatum who required an aortic root replacement and valvuloplasty for an ascending aortic aneurism with aortic valve regurgitation and tricuspid valve regurgitation. There was a severe angulation of the sternum which was close to 1.5 cm to the column vertebrae. Such cases are quite rare and always a challenge for surgeons to achieve adequate exposure of the heart and prevent excessive cardiac compression. We present our access, a safe and efficient exposure of the heart in order to achieve the best outcome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis considered inoperable or at high operative risk, but the long-term outcome remains unknown. HYPOTHESIS: we assessed the 4-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis. METHODS: sixty-three patients (mean age 80 ± 6 years) with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (Logistic EuroSCORE 28.8 ± 10.9%) were included in this study. RESULTS: all-cause cumulative mortality at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years was 14.3, 25.4, 28.6 and 36.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of documented major stroke at 4 years was 6.3%. In survivors, there was a significant improvement in functional status at 4 years. Paravalvular leak (trivial/mild to moderate) was observed in the majority of patients post-TAVI with no case of progression to severe regurgitation at 4-year follow-up. In multivariate analysis, independent predictor for increased all-cause mortality was left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (HR: 5.347, 95% CI: 1.126-25.381, P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: our study demonstrated favourable long-term (4 years) outcomes after successful TAVI using the third-generation Medtronic CoreValve device.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Bioprótese , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Desenho de Prótese , Medição de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 anesthetic techniques, general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care, performed by the same cardiac anesthesiologists for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the authors' institution. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A single specialized cardiac surgery center. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-eight patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and a high logistic EuroSCORE considered not eligible to undergo conventional aortic valve replacement. INTERVENTION: General anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: General anesthesia was used in 57 and monitored anesthesia care in 41 patients. The authors compared the following parameters: Duration of procedure, transfusion requirements, cardiac indices, superior vena cava saturation (ScVO2) before and after the aortic valve implantation, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality. The only significant differences between the groups concerned were the duration of anesthesia (p<0.001) and ScVO2 values. Anesthesia duration was prolonged significantly when general anesthesia was administered, and ScVO2 was significantly higher both before and after the valve implantation in the general anesthesia group. Thirty-day mortality was 5.3% in the general anesthesia group and 4.9% in the monitored anesthesia group. CONCLUSIONS: It would appear that both anesthetic techniques may be used for patients with a high logistic EuroSCORE undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.