Recent changes in the workload and clinical experience of pre-registration house officers: experiences over four years in south-west England.

We aimed to measure changes in the training and workload of pre-registration house officers using a postal questionnaire. Two hundred and six pre-registration house officers in the south-western region of England were surveyed and asked to report on the education, training and workload of their posts. Results were compared with a survey conducted four years earlier. Since the previous survey, the number of hours on duty had reduced from a median of 80 h week-1 in 1992/3 to 72 h week-1 in 1996/7 (P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant changes in the number of patients admitted or clerked in an average week, but house officers' clinical experience had fallen. All but five of 26 marker conditions showed a decline, which was statistically significant in seven cases. House officers were keener to include four months of general practice in the pre-registration year and were less adverse to extending the pre-registration year to two years. The reduction in hours of work for house officers has been accompanied by a decline in their clinical exposure to common medical and surgical emergencies. The long-term effects of these changes are unknown.

Preregistration house officers in the Thames regions: changes in quality of training after four years.

OBJECTIVE: To measure changes in the training and workload of preregistration house officers over four years. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire. SETTING: The Thames health regions. PARTICIPANTS: 1049 preregistration house officers. RESULTS: Response rate was 69% (725 replies). The proportion of house officers officially on duty > 83 hours a week fell from at least 42% to 21%, and the proportion officially on duty < or = 72 hours rose from no more than 9% to 40%. Adequate guidance in breaking bad news increased from 25% to 46% (p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval for difference, 16.2% to 25.8%) and guidance in pain control increased from 36% to 46% (p < 0.01; 5.0% to 15.0%). The number of house officers attending an induction course increased from 61% to 94% (p < 0.001; 28.9% to 37.1%). There was no change in the proportion unable to attend formal educational sessions because of clinical commitments or in levels of satisfaction with consultants' educational supervision. The median number of inpatients under house officers' care fell from 20 to 17, but the numbers of patients clerked in an average week showed little change. House officers were less satisfied with the clinical experience their post provided (proportion dissatisfied rose from 30% to 39%; p < 0.01; 4.2% to 13.8%) and less enthusiastic about recommending their post to a friend (proportion neutral or not recommending rose from 30% to 42%, p < 0.0001; 7.9% to 16.9%). CONCLUSION: Despite progress in reducing hours of duty and providing induction courses, the training that hospitals and consultants provide for house officers is still unsatisfactory and inconsistent with the General Medical Council's recommendations.

Preregistration house officers in eight English regions: survey of quality of training.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of preregistration house officer training in eight English regions. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire. SETTING: Thames, East Anglian, Mersey, Northern, and Wessex regions. PARTICIPANTS: 1670 preregistration house officers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Education, hours of work, workload, conditions of work, and attitudes to job and medicine as a career. RESULTS: Response rate was 69% (1146 replies). Most house officers had attended induction courses (1036/1129 (92%)); 74% (757/1024) found them satisfactory. The proportions who had never received adequate guidance on how to break bad news and how to control pain were 59% (670/1135) and 56% (634/1136) respectively. There was much variation between regions. Overall, 65% (736/1138) reported confidence in performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Most respondents (95% (1089/1142)) worked an on call rota, 3% (36) a partial shift, and 0.6% (seven) a full shift; 19% (202) were on duty for average weekly hours that exceeded the targets for 1 April 1993. House officers had a median of 20 patients under their care and clerked a median of 10 emergency cases, six routine cases, and two day cases a week. Over half (690/1128 (61%)) could not obtain hot food after 8 pm, 20% (223/1095) did not always have clean sheets available in their on call room, and 45% (462/1036) did not consider the protection of staff against violence to be adequate at their hospital. The most important problems with the preregistration year were inappropriate or non-medical tasks (ranked first by 360 respondents), hours of work (359), and pay for out of hours work (167). Overall 57% (646/1125) would encourage a friend to apply for their post, but only 24% (266/1112) would encourage a friend to take up medicine and 44% (494/1112) would discourage the idea. CONCLUSIONS: House officers' training is deficient in important respects, with inappropriate tasks and heavy clinical workloads impeding the provision of proper education.

Preregistration house officers in the four Thames regions: I. Survey of education and workload.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the education and workload of preregistration house officers in the four Thames regions. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire. SETTING: Teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the four Thames regions. PARTICIPANTS: 1064 Preregistration house officers. RESULTS: Response rate was 70% (740 replies). Nine per cent of house officers (66/729) worked a rota of one in two. The average house officer had 20.4 inpatients under his or her care and admitted 23.2 patients per week. Sixty two per cent of house officers (459/740) felt that they spent an excessive amount of time on non-medical tasks of no educational merit; 75% (546/725) had never received adequate guidance on breaking bad news and 64% (467/729) had never received adequate guidance on pain control; 34% (249/731) did not feel confident that they could perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation unsupervised. House officers would tend to recommend their post to a friend. CONCLUSIONS: There are deficiencies in preregistration training in the four Thames regions. The General Medical Council's requirements are not being heeded.

Preregistration house officers in the four Thames regions: II. Comparison of education and workload in teaching and non-teaching hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To detect differences in the education and workload of preregistration house officers working in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. DESIGN: A postal questionnaire. SETTING: Teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the four Thames regions. PARTICIPANTS: 1064 Preregistration house officers. RESULTS: Response rate was 61% for teaching hospitals and 73% for non-teaching hospitals. House officers in teaching hospitals had significantly fewer inpatients under their care (house physicians 16.9 v 22.9, house surgeons 17.9 v 20.3) and admitted fewer emergency patients per week (house physicians 7.7 v 12.7, house surgeons 6.5 v 9.8). More house officers in teaching hospitals reported that they had too few patients to provide adequate clinical experience. More of their time was consumed by administrative activities devoid of educational value. CONCLUSION: Preregistration house officer posts at teaching hospitals provide less clinical activity and are perceived as less educationally satisfactory by their holders than those elsewhere.