The amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface in relation to final endometrial cancer classification.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface is related to the degree of concordance with final low- and high-grade endometrial cancer (EC). In addition, to determine whether discordance is influenced by sampling method and impacts outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC). Surface of preoperative endometrial tissue samples was digitally calculated using ImageJ. Tumor samples were classified into low-grade (grade 1-2 endometrioid EC (EEC)) and high-grade (grade 3 EEC + non-endometroid EC). RESULTS: The study cohort included 573 tumor samples. Overall concordance between pre- and postoperative diagnosis was 60.0%, and 88.8% when classified into low- and high-grade EC. Upgrading (preoperative low-grade, postoperative high-grade EC) was found in 7.8% and downgrading (preoperative high-grade, postoperative low-grade EC) in 26.7%. The median endometrial tissue surface was significantly lower in concordant diagnoses when compared to discordant diagnoses, respectively 18.7 mm2 and 23.5 mm2 (P = 0.022). Sampling method did not influence the concordance in tumor classification. Patients with preoperative high-grade and postoperative low-grade showed significant lower DSS compared to patients with concordant low-grade EC (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface was inversely related to the degree of concordance with final tumor low- and high-grade. Obtaining higher amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface does not increase the concordance between pre- and postoperative low- and high-grade diagnosis in EC. Awareness of clinically relevant down- and upgrading is crucial to reduce subsequent over- or undertreatment with impact on outcome.

Predicting the likelihood of successful medical treatment of early pregnancy loss: development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model.

STUDY QUESTION: What are clinical predictors for successful medical treatment in case of early pregnancy loss (EPL)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Use of mifepristone, BMI, number of previous uterine aspirations and the presence of minor clinical symptoms (slight vaginal bleeding or some abdominal cramps) at treatment start are predictors for successful medical treatment in case of EPL. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Success rates of medical treatment for EPL vary strongly, between but also within different treatment regimens. Up until now, although some predictors have been identified, no clinical prediction model has been developed yet. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial in 17 Dutch hospitals, executed between 28 June 2018 and 8 January 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with a non-viable pregnancy between 6 and 14 weeks of gestational age, who opted for medical treatment after a minimum of 1 week of unsuccessful expectant management. Potential predictors for successful medical treatment of EPL were chosen based on literature and expert opinions. We internally validated the prediction model using bootstrapping techniques. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: 237 out of 344 women had a successful medical EPL treatment (68.9%). The model includes the following variables: use of mifepristone, BMI, number of previous uterine aspirations and the presence of minor clinical symptoms (slight vaginal bleeding or some abdominal cramps) at treatment start. The model shows a moderate capacity to discriminate between success and failure of treatment, with an AUC of 67.6% (95% CI = 64.9-70.3%). The model had a good fit comparing predicted to observed probabilities of success but might underestimate treatment success in women with a predicted probability of success of ∼70%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The vast majority (90.4%) of women were Caucasian, potentially leading to less optimal model performance in a non-Caucasian population. Limitations of our model are that we have not yet been able to externally validate its performance and clinical impact, and the moderate accuracy of the prediction model of 0.67. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: We developed a prediction model, aimed to improve and personalize counselling for medical treatment of EPL by providing a woman with her individual chance of complete evacuation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The Triple M Trial, upon which this secondary analysis was performed, was funded by the Healthcare Insurers Innovation Foundation (project number 3080 B15-191). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03212352.

Immunohistochemical biomarkers are prognostic relevant in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Pre-operative immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers are not incorporated in endometrial cancer (EC) risk classification. We aim to investigate the added prognostic relevance of IHC biomarkers to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and lymph node (LN) status in EC. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), analyzing pre-operative IHC expression of p53, L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), and relate to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk groups, LN status and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 763 EC patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.5-years. Abnormal IHC expression was present for p53 in 112 (14.7%), L1CAM in 79 (10.4%), ER- in 76 (10.0%), and PR- in 138 (18.1%) patients. Abnormal expression of p53/L1CAM/ER/PR was significantly related with higher risk classification groups, and combined associated with the worst outcome within the 'high and advanced/metastatic' risk group. In multivariate analysis p53-abn, ER/PR- and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 'high and advanced/metastatic' were independently associated with reduced disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients with abnormal IHC expression and lymph node metastasis (LNM) had the worst outcome. Patients with LNM and normal IHC expression had comparable outcome with patients without LNM and abnormal IHC expression. CONCLUSION: The use of pre-operative IHC biomarkers has important prognostic relevance in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and in addition to LN status. For daily clinical practice, p53/L1CAM/ER/PR expression could serve as indicator for surgical staging and refine selective adjuvant treatment by incorporation into the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification.

The opinion of gynecologists on the management of early-stage, high-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: There is no consensus on the management of Stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) with grade 3 histology. This study evaluates the opinion of gynecologists in The Netherlands on the management of Stage I, grade 3 EEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Working Group were requested to complete a digital questionnaire on the management of Stage I, grade 3 EEC. Actual treatment of patients with Stage I, grade 3 EEC was assessed by analysis of PALGA, the Dutch Pathology Registry. RESULTS: Most gynecologists prefer routine lymphadenectomy or complete staging (62.3%), while these were actually performed in 27.3% of the cases. Gynecologic oncologists are more likely to perform a lymphadenectomy than general gynecologists. There was a wide variation of clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The results of this study underline the need for additional research into management of Stage I, grade 3 EEC as well as the need for conclusive guidelines.

Absolute depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer is superior to the currently used cut-off value of 50%.

OBJECTIVE: In endometrial carcinoma, myometrial invasion is a well known predictor of recurrence, and important in the decision making for adjuvant treatment. According to the FIGO staging system, myometrial invasion is expressed as invasion of <50%> of the myometrium (50%MI). It has been suggested to use the absolute depth of invasion (DOI), or the tumor free distance to the serosa (TFD). The aim of this study was to compare DOI, 50%MI, and TFD. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma at the RUNMC, and the CWH from 1999 to 2009 were included. Histologic slides were reviewed for histologic type and grade, DOI, 50%MI, and TFD. After review, 335 patients were identified. DOI, 50%MI, and TFD were evaluated for their prediction of clinicopathologic characteristics. RESULTS: The prediction of recurrence was best performed by DOI when compared to TFD, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.726, and 0.638 respectively. The optimal cut-off value for DOI was 4mm. DOI independently correlated with recurrence of disease, and death of disease. TFD was associated with advanced age and large tumor diameter. DOI was the best predictor of progression-free and disease-specific survival next to 50%MI and TFD (HR 3.15, 95%CI 1.16-8.56) and (HR 10.35, 95%CI 1.23-86.93). CONCLUSIONS: DOI showed better predictive performance than TFD, and was more strongly correlated with clinicopathologic parameters than TFD and 50%MI. Possibly, DOI should substitute 50%MI as measure to express myometrial invasion in daily clinical practice. External validation is mandatory to confirm the proposed cut-off value of 4mm.

Internal jugular vein thrombosis as paraneoplastic syndrome of primary ovarian non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Primary malignant lymphoma involving the ovaries is extremely rare. We present a unique case of a primary Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of both ovaries, preceded by an internal jugular vein trombosis (IJVT) as paraneoplastic syndrome. Currently, 36 months after surgical treatment of this FIGO Stage Ib, Ann Arbor Stage 2E NHL, the patient is clinically free of disease. Based on this case and a review of the literature it is concluded that paraneoplastic syndromes like spontaneous IJVT should prompt the clinician to make a thorough diagnostic work-up in search of an underlying malignancy, including the female genital tract.

Routine pelvic lymphadenectomy in apparently early stage endometrial cancer.

AIMS: Controversial issues with respect to the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer include indications for lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. PATIENT AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2004 all women with endometrial cancer stage I were included (n = 335). They all underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oöphorectomy. Two hundred and thirty-seven women also had a pelvic lymphadenectomy. When pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed, radiotherapy was administered only to patients with lymph-node metastases. Otherwise, adjuvant radiotherapy was based on the presence of risk factors. RESULTS: Eleven patients had lymph-node metastases. The overall absolute and relative survival-estimate at 5 years was 85.0 and 93.7%, respectively. Loco-regional recurrence was 8.5%. In the group with pelvic lymphadenectomy and negative lymph nodes these rates were 88.2, 93.9 and 5.6%, respectively. In 58 patients without any of the risk factors tumour grade III, deep myometrial invasion, or age > or =60 years, no lymph-node metastases were found. CONCLUSION: In patients with endometrial cancer FIGO stage I without risk-factors, a phenomenon which occurs in about 25% of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer, a lymphadenectomy can be omitted. In other patients, the debate regarding the optimal treatment will remain.

Efficacy and tolerability of a new estradiol delivering matrix patch (Estraderm MX) in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and tolerability of a new matrix patch delivering estradiol (E2 Matrix) at doses of 0.05 and 0.10 mg per day (Estraderm MX 50, 100) in the treatment of moderate to severe postmenopausal symptoms. METHODS: A total of 254 postmenopausal women were randomized to receive treatment with E2 Matrix 0.10 mg (N = 86), E2 Matrix 0.05 mg (N = 82), or placebo (N = 86) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion for a period of 12 weeks continuously. Patches were applied twice weekly to the buttocks with each patient wearing two patches at all times. The primary efficacy criterion was the difference from baseline of the mean number of moderate to severe hot flushes per 24 h during the last 2 weeks of treatment. Other efficacy variables included reduction in hot flushes at 4 and 8 weeks, reduction in daytime flushing and night sweats, and Kupperman Index at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: E2 Matrix 0.10 and 0.05 mg were both significantly superior to placebo in reducing hot flushes per 24 h after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001). Also, for all other efficacy parameters studied, both dosage strengths of E2 Matrix were statistically significantly superior to placebo at all time points (P < 0.001). Local tolerability was good in both groups. A slight increase in estrogen related adverse effects (breast tenderness, leukorrhoea) was seen with the 0.10 mg patch. Adhesion of patches and compliance were good. Overall systemic tolerability was good in both treated groups. However, a 4.8% overall incidence of endometrial hyperplasia was observed in patients with an intact uterus. CONCLUSIONS: This new matrix patch offers an effective and well tolerated dosage form for delivery of 0.05 and 0.1 mg estradiol per day. It may be particularly suitable for those women who experience local sensitivity to alcohol-containing systems. In light of the observed hyperplasia after treatment in five patients, estrogen therapy should as yet be supplemented monthly with a progestogen in women with an intact uterus.

Immunocytochemical analysis of oestrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in the human uterus throughout the menstrual cycle and after the menopause.

To obtain more insight into the relationship between cyclic and regional changes in steroid receptor expression and function-related changes in the various types of cell of the normal human uterus, we performed an immunocytochemical study on paraffin-embedded sections. The distribution and intensity of immunostaining for the oestrogen receptor and the progesterone receptor in the various types of cell were semiquantitatively scored. The data were statistically compared for the different phases of the menstrual cycle and after the menopause, and for the different regions of the corpus and (endo)cervix uteri. During the menstrual cycle, significant changes in oestrogen receptor score were observed in glandular and stromal cells of endometrium basalis and functionalis and in smooth muscle cells of the myometrium. In all types of cell, oestrogen receptor expression reached a maximum in the late proliferative phase. During the early secretory phase, oestrogen receptor staining declined sharply in stromal and smooth muscle cells, whereas, in glandular epithelium, oestrogen receptor expression decreased more gradually. During mid- and late-secretory phases, an increase in oestrogen receptor staining was also observed in predecidualizing stromal cells and smooth muscle cells. Progesterone receptor numbers changed significantly in glandular epithelium but not in stromal and smooth muscle cells. Glandular progesterone receptor expression reached a maximum in the early secretory phase and was then drastically reduced. During mid- and late-secretory phases stromal cells were moderately stained for progesterone receptor in contrast to epithelial gland cells which showed no or very weak staining. No regional variations in steroid receptor distribution in endometrium and myometrium were found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Oestrogen and progesterone receptor immunocytochemistry in human hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrium.

Proliferative disorders of the endometrium may be associated with autocrine and paracrine actions between stromal and epithelial cells. To determine whether the stromal-epithelial relation with respect to oestrogen receptor (OR) and progesterone receptor (PR) is disturbed in (pre)malignant endometrium immunocytochemical OR and PR expression was quantitated by computerized image analysis. This was studied in the stromal and epithelial cells of endometrial specimens diagnosed as hyperplasia (n = 14), atypical hyperplasia (n = 16), and adenocarcinoma (n = 33). Paraffin sections were used for optimal preservation of histomorphology. A progressive loss of OR and PR content occurred with increasing malignant transformation. Stromal cells in atypical hyperplasia (P = 0.0007) and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (P = 0.0008) exhibited a relative loss of PR content as compared with epithelial cells (P = 0.036 and P = 0.17, respectively). In atypical hyperplasia, the decrease in stromal PR content was not in parallel with persistent stromal OR immunostaining. Furthermore, stromal PR expression in atypical hyperplasia was significantly (P = 0.004) lower than in the surrounding hyperplasia, whereas the stromal OR staining as well as the epithelial OR and PR staining did not differ significantly. These observations may reflect a disturbance in hormonal interrelationships between endometrial cells in the development of endometrial neoplasia, indicating that stroma may modulate epithelial growth by paracrine mechanisms.

Is immunohistochemical analysis of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in endometrial carcinoma superior to the radioligand binding assay?

The aim of this study was to evaluate tissue and steroid receptor heterogeneity in endometrial carcinoma specimens as a possible source of discordance between biochemically assayed receptor status and response to endocrine treatment. For this purpose the oestrogen receptor (OR) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels in specimens from 16 endometrial carcinoma patients were analysed on adjacent tissue sections using both a radiochemical and an immunohistochemical assay. With immunohistochemical receptor analysis extensive tissue and tumour cell receptor heterogeneity was observed. Many tumour samples revealed up to 75 per cent contamination with benign tissue. In the majority of cases, evaluation of immunoreactivity in normal tissue elements of the specimen could explain the apparent discordance between semiquantitative immunohistochemical receptor scoring of tumour cells and radiochemical receptor assay. Immunohistochemical analysis of OR and PR in endometrial carcinoma specimens allows a more specific determination of tumour cell receptor content and hence may yield a more accurate prediction of response to endocrine therapy than the biochemical assay.