US Military Veteran Perspectives on Eating Disorder Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore US veteran perspectives on eating disorder screening, diagnosis, patient-provider conversations, and care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHOD: Rapid qualitative analysis of 30-45 min phone interviews with 16 (N = 16) veterans with an electronic health record ICD-10 eating disorder diagnosis, who received care at one of two VHA healthcare systems in Connecticut or California. Topics covered included: conversations with providers about eating disorder symptoms, diagnosis, and referral to treatment; feedback about an eating disorder screener, and; reflections on eating disorders among veterans and VHA's effort to address them. RESULTS: Most veterans reported difficulty understanding and defining the problems they were experiencing and self-diagnosed their eating disorder before discussing it with a provider. Treatment referrals were almost universally for being overweight rather than for an eating disorder, often leading veterans to feel misunderstood or marginalized. Overall, veterans were enthusiastic about the screener, preferred screening to be conducted by primary care providers, and noted that conversations needed to be non-stigmatizing. There was consensus that VHA is not doing enough to address this issue, that group support and therapy could be beneficial, and that resources needed to be centralized and accessible. DISCUSSION: For the most part, veterans felt that, at best, eating disorders and disordered eating are overlooked, and at worst, conflated with overweight. The majority of veterans got referred for weight loss or weight management services but would welcome the opportunity to be screened for, and referred to, eating disorder treatment.

Pain Care at Home to Amplify Function: Protocol Article.

Guidelines recommend strategies to optimize opioid medication safety, including frequent reassessment of the benefits and harms of long-term opioid therapy. Prescribers, who are predominantly primary care providers (PCPs), may lack the training or resources to implement these guideline-concordant practices. Two interventions have been designed to assist PCPs and tested within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Telemedicine Collaborative Management (TCM) provides primarily medication management support via care manager-prescriber teams. Cooperative Pain Education and Self-Management (COPES) promotes self-management strategies for chronic pain via cognitive behavior therapy techniques. Each intervention has been shown to improve prescribing and/or patient outcomes. The added value of combining these interventions is untested. With funding and central coordination by the Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) Network of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative, we will conduct a multisite patient-level randomized hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial within VHA to compare TCM to TCM + COPES on the primary composite outcome of pain interference and opioid safety, secondary outcomes of alcohol use, anxiety, depression, and sleep, and other consensus IMPOWR Network measures. Implementation facilitation strategies informed by interviews with healthcare providers will target site-specific needs. The impact of these strategies on TCM implementation will be assessed via established formative and summative evaluation techniques. Economic analyses will evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness.

Validation of the EDDS-5 self-report survey against the SCID-5 diagnostic interview in US veterans.

The aim of our study was to validate the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS-5) updated for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) with a diverse veteran population against a clinician-administered interview based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Our sample included 343 veterans, 18-75 years, recruited April 2019 to December 2022 who completed the EDDS-5 as well as other eating disorder and mental health measures. A subsample of these veterans received clinical interviews (n = 166), which were used to validate the EDDS-5. We found that despite multiple proposed modifications, the EDDS-5 performed poorly at correctly identifying diverse veterans who were diagnosed as having eating disorders through clinician-administered interviews. The sensitivity was very low, indicating that using the EDDS-5 did not identify many true positives and may also over diagnose those without true eating disorders. The EDDS-5 may not be the best for screening or diagnostic purposes among diverse samples like veterans.

Qualitative Analysis of Patient Perspectives of Buprenorphine After Transitioning From Long-Term, Full-Agonist Opioid Therapy Among Veterans With Chronic Pain.

Guidelines recommend consideration of modification, tapering, or discontinuation of long-term, full-agonist opioid therapy when harms outweigh benefits; one alternative to tapering or discontinuing full-agonist opioids for the management of chronic pain is switching to the partial agonist buprenorphine. As the use of buprenorphine for pain expands, understanding the patient experience during and after the transition to buprenorphine is critical. We conducted 45- to 60-minute semistructured qualitative interviews with 19 patients to understand the experiences of patients with chronic pain actively maintained on buprenorphine after previously receiving full-agonist, long-term opioid therapy. Patients were recruited from 2 medical centers via provider referral. Through thematic analysis, 5 overall themes were identified, including satisfaction with buprenorphine, the importance of preconceptions about buprenorphine, experiences with transitions, patient-provider communication, and potential contributions to racial disparities in pain care. While we heard a range of experiences, most patients were satisfied with buprenorphine, reporting either equivalent pain control to their previous regimens or reporting less analgesia but improved functioning due to a reduction in side effects (eg, mental clarity). Patients also emphasized the importance of a nonjudgmental, patient-centered approach, including education about the risks and benefits of buprenorphine. The few Black patients interviewed all reported limited access to pain care, which is consistent with the well-documented existence of racial disparities in access to pain treatment. As buprenorphine is used more frequently for pain management, provider education focused on pain treatment disparities, patient-centered approaches informed by motivational interviewing, and increasing acceptance of buprenorphine as an option for pain are needed. PERSPECTIVE: Qualitative analyses of patient experiences transitioning from full-agonist opioids to buprenorphine for chronic pain revealed general satisfaction. Patients reflected on functioning, tradeoffs between analgesia and side effects, patient-centered care, and access to treatment, highlighting how future research should focus on outcomes valued by patients.

Distinguishing probable atypical anorexia nervosa from weight loss alone in a national sample of U.S. Military Veterans: Disentangling the roles of weight suppression and cognitive concerns.

OBJECTIVE: Veterans are at high risk for eating disorders (EDs), and specifically for atypical anorexia nervosa (atypical AN). The current study aimed to better understand this under-studied disorder and how it differs from weight loss without ED cognitive features. METHOD: Secondary analyses were conducted with data from a national study of Veterans (N = 882, 49.4% women). Participants were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups using the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale 5: probable atypical AN, a cognitive concerns group (Cog Only), a weight suppressed group (WS Only), and a no ED control group. Adjusted regression models were used to compare groups on measures of eating pathology and mental health. Three weight suppression thresholds (5%, 10%, and 15%) for probable atypical AN were also tested. RESULTS: The sample was comprised of 12% probable atypical AN, 23.6% Cog Only, 16.3% WS Only, and 48.1% Control. The probable atypical AN group was most like the Cog Only group except for higher levels of dietary restraint. Atypical AN fared worse and was least like the Control group followed by the WS Only group. All weight suppression thresholds significantly predicted dietary restraint, with 5% being the best predictor. DISCUSSION: Results found that probable atypical AN is a distinct clinical entity and that the exact weight suppression threshold associated with atypical AN is less important than having any weight suppression. Findings highlight the clinical significance of atypical AN and the importance of gaining a better understanding of how to address this clinical entity. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Atypical anorexia nervosa is a relatively underexamined but highly prevalent eating disorder in the Veteran population. Results show that ED cognitive features are more closely linked to clinically significant eating pathology and poor mental health than weight suppression alone suggesting that negative thinking about weight gain and appearance, regardless of the presence or severity of weight loss, may signal the need for specialized intervention.

The 24-hour food frequency assessment screening tool (FAST24): Development and evaluation of a novel dietary screener to identify foods associated with weight change.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Brief screening questionnaires can identify 'at risk' behaviors in clinical settings. However, there is currently no screener for dietary intake specifically developed using foods associated with body weight change and increased risk for multiple chronic conditions and diseases. METHODS: We developed a novel brief dietary screener, the 24-Hour Food Frequency Assessment Screening Tool Questionnaire (FAST24), to identify intake of foods associated with weight change. University students completed the FAST24 and the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) at two time points to assess acceptability and determine preliminary criterion validity against food categories from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED). RESULTS: 202 individuals (age 20.4 ± 3.6 years; 65.7% females) completed the FAST24 in an average time of 2 min compared to 24 min for the ASA24. Over half of the food items from the FAST24 were matched to, and correlated with, standard USDA food pattern components (r's ranging from .15 to .58, p's < .05). Food items from the dietary data from the FAST24 were also highly correlated with the more intensive ASA24 application (r's ranging from .23 to .82, p's < .01), and were less time-consuming and burdensome to complete (p's < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the continued refinement of the FAST24 as a rapid, valid primary care assessment tool for measuring USDA dietary intake patterns. Use of a short, simple screener such as the FAST24 has the potential for integration into large healthcare delivery settings to help establish a baseline for promoting relative behavior changes critical for long-term health and well-being.

An equity-focused approach to improving access to COVID-19 vaccination using mobile health clinics.

This article describes the implementation of an equity-focused strategy to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among communities of color and in traditionally underserved geographic areas using mobile health clinics (MHCs). The MHC Vaccination Program was implemented through a large integrated healthcare system in North Carolina using a grassroots development and engagement strategy along with a robust model for data-informed decision support to prioritize vulnerable communities. Several valuable lessons from this work can replicated for future outreach initiatives and community-based programming: •Health systems can no longer operate under the assumption that community members will come to them, particularly those experiencing compounding social and economic challenges. The MHC model had to be a proactive outreach to community members, rather than a responsive delivery mechanism. •Barriers to access included financial, legal, and logistical challenges, in addition to mistrust among historically underserved and marginalized communities. •A MHC model can be adaptable and responsive to data-informed decision-making approaches for targeted service delivery. •A MHC model is not a one-dimensional solution to access, but part of a broader strategy to create diverse points of entry into the healthcare system that fall within the rhythm of life of community members.

Development and Psychometric Assessment of the Weight and Eating Quality of Life (WE-QOL) Scale in US Military Veterans.

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is in need of population health approaches to address overweight and obesity-related diseases. BMI serves as a simple, blunt metric to monitor these efforts. However, emerging research has demonstrated that healthcare weigh-ins contribute to weight stigma which paraodoxically is associated with weight gain. An alternative metric is urgently needed for VHA's MOVE!® Weight Management Program and other eating- and weight-related services. OBJECTIVE: To develop a brief population health metric called the Weight and Eating Quality of Life (WE-QOL) Scale and assess its psychometric properties. DESIGN: The literature was reviewed for relevant weight- and eating-specific QOL measures to identify unique and overlapping constructs. Eight items, representing these constructs, comprised the new brief WE-QOL Scale. A survey study was conducted with data analyzed in STATA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 213 consecutively evaluated US Veterans attending an orientation session for MOVE!. MAIN MEASURES: The WE-QOL Scale, as well as a widely used generic health-related QOL measure, the European Quality of Life Screener (EQ-ED-5L), and relevant validated measures. KEY RESULTS: WE-QOL descriptive findings demonstrated severe impacts on physical activity and physical discomfort for approximately 30% of the sample each; moderate-to-severe impacts on daily responsibilities, emotional distress, and shame and guilt for one-third of the sample each and public distress for one-fourth of the sample. The WE-QOL Scale performed as well as, or better than, the EQ-ED-5L for internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91) and associations to relevant constructs (BMI, eating pathology, and physical activity). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the reliability and construct validity of the WE-QOL Scale. The WE-QOL Scale has potential to provide a standardized population health metric that could be used as a screening tool and clinical reminder to identify, refer, and assess outcomes for Veterans with weight and disordered eating issues. Future research could be targeted at using this measure to improve patient care and quality of care.

Delphi study to explore a new diagnosis for "ineffective" long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain.

ABSTRACT: A challenge in clinical, research, and policy spheres is determining whether and how to apply the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 Opioid Use Disorder criteria to patients receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for the management of chronic pain. This study explored perspectives on the merits of creating a new diagnostic entity to characterize the problems that arise for certain patients prescribed LTOT and develop consensus on its definition and diagnostic criteria. We conducted 3 rounds of online surveys and held one discussion-based workshop to explore a new diagnostic entity and generate consensus with subject matter experts (n = 51) in pain and opioid use disorder, including a wide range of professional disciplines. The first survey included open-ended questions and rapid qualitative analysis to identify potential diagnostic criteria. Rounds 2 and 3 involved rating potential diagnostic criteria on a Likert-type scale to achieve consensus. The workshop was a facilitated conversation aimed at further refining criteria. Three-quarters of Delphi panelists were in favor of a new diagnostic entity; consensus was reached for 19 potential diagnostic criteria including benefits of LTOT no longer outweighing harms and a criterion related to difficulty tapering. A subgroup of expert panelists further refined the new diagnostic entity definition and criteria. Consensus on potential criteria for the new diagnostic entity was reached and further refined by a subgroup of experts. This Delphi study represents the opinions of a small group of subject matter experts; perspectives from other experts and additional stakeholder groups (including patients) are warranted.

Patient and provider experiences using a site-to-site telehealth model for medication abortion.

Background: In the site-to-site telehealth for medication abortion model, patients visit a health center to meet with a remote clinician using telehealth technology. This model is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients and providers. The objective of this study was to document the experiences of patients and providers using telehealth for medication abortion in Planned Parenthood health centers across different geographical contexts in the United States. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with Planned Parenthood medication abortion patients who either met with a clinician at the clinic via telehealth or in-person about their experiences receiving care. We also interviewed Planned Parenthood staff members about their experiences implementing telehealth for medication abortion at their health center. Results: We interviewed 29 patients who received care at Planned Parenthood health centers in five states. Both telehealth and in-person patients described positive interactions with health center staff and clinicians. The vast majority of telehealth patients said that they felt comfortable speaking with the clinician over telehealth and had no trouble using the telehealth technology. We interviewed 12 providers, including clinicians and administrative staff, who worked in seven states. Providers largely thought that telehealth for medication abortion expanded access to medication abortion. Conclusions: Across different locations, our findings indicate that patients found telehealth for medication abortion services to be highly acceptable and providers found that telehealth services may help improve medication abortion access. As the use of telehealth for medication abortion expands, future research should include additional measures of quality to ensure that services are acceptable across different identities and experiences, including age, race, gender, and income level.

Classification of Patients for Whom Benefit of Long-term Opioid Therapy No Longer Outweighs Harm: Protocol for a Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic pain prescribed long-term opioid therapy may come to a point where the benefits of the therapy are outweighed by the risks and tapering is indicated. At the 2019 Veterans Health Administration State of the Art Conference, there was an acknowledgment of a lack of clinical guidance with regard to treating this subset of patients. Some of the participants believed clinicians and patients would both benefit from a new diagnostic entity describing this situation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if a new diagnostic entity was needed and what the criteria of the diagnostic entity would be. Given the ability of the Delphi method to synthesize input from a broad range of experts, we felt this technique was the most appropriate for this study. METHODS: We designed a modified Delphi technique involving 3 rounds. The first round is a series of open-ended questions asking about the necessity of this diagnostic entity, how this condition is different from opioid use disorder, and what its possible diagnostic criteria would be. After synthesizing the responses collected, a second round will be conducted to ask participants to rate the different responses offered by their peers. These ratings will be collected and analyzed, and will generate a preliminary definition for this clinical phenomena. In the third round, we will circulate this definition with the aim of achieving consensus. RESULTS: The modified Delphi study was initiated in July of 2020 and analysis is currently underway. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol has been approved by the Internal Review Board at the Connecticut Veterans Affairs and the study is in process. This protocol may assist other researchers conducting similar studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/33310.

Arguments for and Against a New Diagnostic Entity for Patients With Chronic Pain on Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Whom Harms Outweigh Benefits.

The goal of this study was to understand perspectives on whether a new diagnostic entity, distinct from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 5 (DSM-5) opioid use disorder (OUD), is needed for patients with chronic pain on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for whom the harms of continued opioid therapy outweigh the benefits. Data were collected as part of a larger Delphi study. We used rapid and thematic qualitative methods to analyze data from 51 panelists with expertise in internal medicine, psychiatry, psychology, and related fields. Three-quarters of panelists supported a new diagnostic entity; common themes included recognizing distinct experiences of patients prescribed LTOT, addressing problems with DSM-5 OUD criteria, facilitating research and improved treatment, and reducing stigma. Thirteen panelists opposed the creation of a new diagnostic entity; common themes included similarities in biological underpinnings of patients prescribed LTOT and diagnosed with OUD, belief that the continuum of OUD captured patients' experiences, finding better ways to address problems with DSM-5 OUD criteria, and concerns about stigma. While this expert panel disagreed about the need for a new diagnostic entity, there was an overall acknowledgement that the current implementation of DSM-5's OUD diagnosis is not meeting the needs of LTOT providers or patients. PERSPECTIVE: The DSM-5's OUD diagnosis may not adequately meet the needs of patients on LTOT for whom the harms of continued opioid therapy outweigh the benefits. Experts do not agree on how to address this problem; more work is needed to determine if a new diagnostic entity would be beneficial.

Pain and smoking study (PASS): A comparative effectiveness trial of smoking cessation counseling for veterans with chronic pain.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking is associated with greater pain intensity and pain-related functional interference in people with chronic pain. Interventions that teach smokers with chronic pain how to apply adaptive coping strategies to promote both smoking cessation and pain self-management may be effective. METHODS: The Pain and Smoking Study (PASS) is a randomized clinical trial of a telephone-delivered, cognitive behavioral intervention among Veterans with chronic pain who smoke cigarettes. PASS participants are randomized to a standard telephone counseling intervention that includes five sessions focusing on motivational interviewing, craving and relapse management, rewards, and nicotine replacement therapy versus the same components with the addition of a cognitive behavioral intervention for pain management. Participants are assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome is smoking cessation. RESULTS: The 371 participants are 88% male, a median age of 60 years old (range 24-82), and smoke a median of 15 cigarettes per day. Participants are mainly white (61%), unemployed (70%), 33% had a high school degree or less, and report their overall health as "Fair" (40%) to "Poor" (11%). Overall, pain was moderately high (mean pain intensity in past week = 5.2 (Standard Deviation (SD) = 1.6) and mean pain interference = 5.5 (SD = 2.2)). Pain-related anxiety was high (mean = 47.0 (SD = 22.2)) and self-efficacy was low (mean = 3.8 (SD = 1.6)). CONCLUSIONS: PASS utilizes an innovative smoking and pain intervention to promote smoking cessation among Veterans with chronic pain. Baseline characteristics reflect a socioeconomically vulnerable population with a high burden of mental health comorbidities.

I smoke to cope with pain: patients' perspectives on the link between cigarette smoking and pain.

BACKGROUND: For people with chronic pain, cigarette smoking is associated with greater pain intensity and impairment. Researchers have hypothesized a reciprocal relationship in which pain and smoking exacerbate each other, resulting in greater pain and increased smoking. This study aimed to qualitatively examine patient perspectives on this association. METHODS: A retrospective thematic analysis of smoking cessation counseling notes for 136 veterans in the Pain and Smoking Study, a tailored smoking cessation trial, was conducted. A validated codebook was applied to each counseling note by four independent coders using Atlas.ti (Atlas.ti, Berlin, Germany). Coders participated in a consensus-forming exercise with salient themes validated among the wider research team. KEY RESULTS: Participants averaged 60 years of age (range 28-77 years) and were 9% female. The median number of cigarettes smoked per day was 15, with a mean pain intensity score in the last week (from 0-10) of 5.1. While not all patients acknowledged a connection between pain and smoking, we found that (1) pain motivates smoking and helps manage pain-related distress, as a coping strategy and through cognitive distraction, and (2) pain motivates smoking but smoking does not offer pain relief. Concerns about managing pain without smoking was identified as a notable barrier to cessation. CONCLUSION: Many patients with chronic pain who smoke readily identified pain as a motivator of their smoking behavior and are reluctant to quit for this reason. Integrated interventions for smokers with pain should address these perceptions and expectancies and promote uptake of more adaptive self-management strategies for pain.

Atypical Anorexia Nervosa, not so atypical after all: Prevalence, correlates, and clinical severity among United States military Veterans.

OBJECTIVE: DSM-5 Atypical Anorexia Nervosa (AAN), a new eating disorder diagnosis, presents similarly to Anorexia Nervosa (AN) in the absence of severe underweight. The prevalence of AAN and other DSM-5 eating disorders was estimated in a sample of Veterans. Sociodemographic, mental health, and eating behavior correlates were examined. METHOD: Iraq and Afghanistan war era Veterans (N = 1137, 51.6% female) completed the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale-5 for probable AAN diagnosis, and validated measures of eating pathology and mental health, between February 2016 and October 2019. Multivariate analyses compared Veterans with AAN to those with and without any DSM-5 eating disorder. RESULTS: Among completers, 13.6% of women and 4.9% of men in the sample met criteria for probable AAN and 19.2% of women and 13.9% of men for another eating disorder. Mean age was 41 years, and on average BMIs were classified as overweight (BMI = 28.8, SD = 5.6) despite being at least 10% lower than their lifetime highest weight. Two-thirds reported dietary restraint on more than half the days in the past month. On measures of mental health, the AAN group had worse functioning than the no eating disorder group, similar functioning to Veterans with Binge Eating Disorder (BED), and better functioning than Veterans with Bulimia Nervosa (BN). DISCUSSION: Results support AAN as a highly prevalent and clinically significant diagnosis. Findings highlight the need to identify and address eating disorders, particularly other specified eating disorders not meeting criteria for AN, BN, or BED, in active military and Veteran, and other high-risk and underserved, populations.

Associations between adverse childhood experiences and weight, weight control behaviors and quality of life in Veterans seeking weight management services.

INTRODUCTION: A neglected area of trauma research with Veterans is the study of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). The present study aimed to examine the prevalence of ACEs, and to explore relationships between ACEs and measures of weight, eating behaviors and quality of life in weight loss seeking Veterans. METHODS: Participants were 191 Veterans [mean age 58.9 (SD = 12.8), mean Body Mass Index (BMI) 35.4 (SD = 6.1), 86.9% male, 33.7% racial/ethnic minority] receiving care at VA Connecticut Healthcare System (VA CT) who attended an orientation session of VA's behavioral weight management program. Participants completed a measure of ACEs and measures related to weight, eating and health. RESULTS: Among completers, 68.6% endorsed at least one ACE. The average number of reported ACEs was 2.2 (SD = 2.5), with 48.7% of Veterans reporting more than one type of ACE. Women were more likely to report any ACE (88.0% vs. 65.6%, p = .025) and reported significantly more ACEs compared to males (4.2 vs. 1.9, p < .001). ACEs were associated with lower physical activity (p = .05), lower quality of life (p's < 0.05), and lower weight-related quality of life (p < .01), but not weight, weight control strategies, binge eating, or alcohol use. CONCLUSION: ACEs are common among weight loss seeking Veterans, particularly among female Veterans. Findings suggest that there is a high rate of ACEs in Veterans, which are associated with exercise and quality of life outcomes, but not diet and weight outcomes.

Introduction of telemedicine for medication abortion: Changes in service delivery patterns in two U.S. states.

OBJECTIVE(S): Telemedicine for medication abortion (teleMAB) is safe and effective, yet little is known about how its introduction affects service delivery. We assessed changes in service delivery patterns 1 year after introducing teleMAB at Planned Parenthood in 2 U.S. states. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective records analysis using electronic health record data from Planned Parenthood health centers in Montana and Nevada from 2015 to 2018. We included all patients receiving medication or aspiration abortion in the year before and after introducing site-to-site teleMAB. Outcomes included: the proportion of medication abortions (vs. aspiration); gestational age at abortion; time to appointment; and distance traveled. We compared outcomes pre- and postimplementation using χ2, t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 3,038 abortions: 1,314 pre- and 1,724 postimplementation. In Montana, the proportion of medication abortions increased postimplementation (60% vs. 65%, p = 0.04). Mean gestational age was similar: 58 versus 57 days (p = 0.35). Mean time to appointment decreased (14 vs. 12 days, p < 0.0001), as did one-way distance traveled by patients (134 vs. 115 miles, p = 0.03). In Nevada, where Planned Parenthood only provided medication abortion, total medication abortions increased (461 vs. 735). Mean gestational age remained stable (51 vs. 51 days, p = 0.33), as did time to appointment (8 vs. 8 days, p = 0.76). Mean one-way distance traveled was 47 miles in the preperiod versus 34 miles in the postperiod (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION(S): Medication abortion increased after the introduction of telemedicine in both states, though we cannot account for abortions performed by other providers. Telemedicine has the potential to improve access to medication abortion. IMPLICATIONS: Telemedicine has the potential to improve or maintain access to medication abortion and should be taken to scale where feasible. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate or reverse policy restrictions on telemedicine for medication abortion.

Medication Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine in Four U.S. States.

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of medication abortion provided through telemedicine compared with standard medication abortion at Planned Parenthood health centers in four U.S. states. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed electronic health records for patients receiving telemedicine compared with standard medication abortion at 26 health centers in Alaska, Idaho, Nevada, and Washington from April 2017 to March 2018. All patients had on-site ultrasound scans, laboratory testing, and counseling and provided informed consent before meeting with the clinician. Telemedicine patients met with a clinician by secure videoconference platform; standard patients met with a clinician in person. We also reviewed adverse event reports submitted during this period. Study outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, receipt of or referral for aspiration procedure, and clinically significant adverse events. To compare outcomes between the telemedicine and standard groups, we performed logistic regression accounting for gestational age and health center clustering. RESULTS: A total of 5,952 patients underwent medication abortion (738 telemedicine and 5,214 standard). Mean gestational age was 50.4 days for telemedicine patients compared with 48.9 days for standard patients (prevalence ratio 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03). We had outcome data for 4,456 (74.9%) patients; follow-up within 45 days of abortion was lower among telemedicine patients (60.3%) than standard patients (76.9%) (prevalence ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.78-0.88). Among patients with follow-up data, ongoing pregnancy was less common among telemedicine patients (2/445, 0.5%) than standard patients (71/4,011, 1.8%) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.23; 95% CI 0.14-0.39). Aspiration procedures were less common among telemedicine patients (6/445, 1.4%) than standard patients (182/4,011, 4.5%) (adjusted OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.17-0.46). Fewer than 1% of patients in each group reported clinically significant adverse events. No deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study conducted across geographically diverse settings support existing evidence that outcomes for medication abortion provided through telemedicine are comparable with standard provision of medication abortion. Differences in observed outcomes may be due to differential follow-up between groups.