A randomized double-blind trial of the effects of hormone therapy on delayed verbal recall in older women.

We examined whether estradiol and norethindrone hormone therapy (HT) prevented decline in delayed verbal recall in older women with normal to mildly impaired memory functioning. This was a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 142 women aged 61-87, randomly assigned to receive 1 mg 17-beta estradiol daily and 0.35 mg norethindrone 3 days/week or daily placebo for 2 years. The primary outcome was short-delay verbal recall of the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). To look for differences in response to HT by baseline short-delay recall, we examined the primary outcome in participants grouped according to whether their baseline scores were below average for the age group or greater than or equal to this score and according to whether they met criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or not. 133 women completed 1 year of the trial and 128 completed 2 years. Prespecified covariates in all repeated measures analyses of covariance (RANCOVA) included age, education, APOE epsilon4, and prior HT use. RANCOVA showed no overall significant treatment effects at year 1 or year 2. After testing for an interaction, which was significant (p=0.02), we found that women in the HT group who scored at or above the average showed significantly less decline than the placebo group in short-delay verbal recall after 1 year, p=0.007 and 2 years, p=0.01. No treatment effects were found in women below the average in either year. When grouped according to whether the participant met criteria for MCI, the interaction between treatment group and MCI subgroup was not significant. These results suggest that benefits of estrogen exposure may be limited to those with average to above average scores on the delayed verbal recall. HT dose and formulation may have contributed to these beneficial outcomes. Replication is warranted before recommendations can be made in the clinical setting.

Neuropsychological predictors of self-neglect in cognitively impaired older people who live alone.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the accuracy of certain neuropsychological tests in the prediction of harm resulting from self-neglect in cognitively impaired seniors who lived alone. METHODS: The study included 130 participants, aged 65 and older, who scored less than 131 on the Dementia Rating Scale. Neuropsychological tests were administered at baseline, resulting in eight predictive scores. Informants and primary care physicians provided information about harm that occurred to the participants during the 18-month prospective follow up. An incident was defined as harmful if it occurred as the result of self-neglect or disorientation and resulted in physical injury or property loss or damage and required emergency interventions. Proportional hazard regression analysis was conducted to examine the predictive relationship between the eight neuropsychological tests and time to incident harm with age, sex, education, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the Mini-Mental State Examination included in the model as covariates. RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants experienced harm during the 18-month follow-up period. A proportional hazards model indicated that three neuropsychological tests, which measured recognition memory, executive functioning, and conceptualization, were independent risk factors for harm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insight into why harm occurred in these cognitively impaired elders who lived alone. They also support the ecologic validity of these tests and suggest directions for the development of intervention strategies for harm prevention.