Human CD14hi monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells provide a cell contact-dependent costimulatory signal for early CD40 ligand expression.

CD40L on CD4(+) T cells plays a vital role in the activation of antigen-presenting cells, thus catalyzing a positive feedback loop for T-cell activation. Despite the pivotal juxtaposition of CD40L between antigen-presenting cells and T-cell activation, only a T-cell receptor stimulus is thought to be required for early CD40L surface expression. We show, for the first time, that CD40L expression on peripheral blood CD4(+) T cells is highly dependent on a cell-cell interaction with CD14(hi)CD16(-) monocytes. Interactions with ICAM-1, LFA-3, and to a lesser extent CD80/CD86 contribute to this enhancement of CD40L expression but are not themselves sufficient. The contact-mediated increase in CD40L expression is dependent on new mRNA and protein synthesis. Circulating myeloid dendritic cells also possess this costimulatory activity. By contrast, CD14(lo)CD16(+) monocytes, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, B-cell lymphoma lines, and resting, activated, and Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized primary B cells all lack the capacity to up-regulate early CD40L. The latter indicates that a human B cell cannot activate its cognate T cell to deliver CD40L-mediated help. This finding has functional implications for the role of biphasic CD40L expression, suggesting that the early phase is associated with antigen-presenting cell activation, whereas the late phase is related to B-cell activation.

Direct inhibition of CD40L expression can contribute to the clinical efficacy of daclizumab independently of its effects on cell division and Th1/Th2 cytokine production.

Humanized anti-CD25 antibodies (eg, daclizumab) have been successfully used to treat several autoimmune diseases. Paradoxically, IL-2 blockade in mice can induce autoimmunity. An interspecies difference in the relative contribution of IL-2 to CD25(+) T regulatory cell (CD25(+)Treg) versus CD25(+) effector cell function might explain this conundrum. Consistent with this are reports that daclizumab inhibits human CD25(+) effector cell cytokine production by blocking the expression of CD40L. However, in mice, IL-4 and IL-12 regulate CD40L expression. As human Th1/Th2 cytokine production is also dependent on IL-2, daclizumab's inhibition of CD40L expression could be due to an indirect, rather than a direct, effect of IL-2. Here, we clarify the mechanisms underlying CD40L expression. In contrast to the mouse, human CD40L is regulated by CD28 signaling and IL-2, not the principal Th1/Th2-polarizing cytokines. We find that CD40L is expressed on naive and memory cells and inhibited by daclizumab independently of cell division. Collectively, our results indicate that daclizumab could inhibit CD25(+) effector T-cell function in vivo by directly blocking CD40L expression. This difference between mice and human may help explain the paradoxical effects of IL-2R blockade in the 2 species.

Protection against lethal vaccinia virus challenge in HLA-A2 transgenic mice by immunization with a single CD8+ T-cell peptide epitope of vaccinia and variola viruses.

CD8(+) T lymphocytes have been shown to be involved in controlling poxvirus infection, but no protective cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes are defined for variola virus, the causative agent of smallpox, or for vaccinia virus. Of several peptides in vaccinia virus predicted to bind HLA-A2.1, three, VETFsm(498-506), A26L(6-14), and HRP2(74-82), were found to bind HLA-A2.1. Splenocytes from HLA-A2.1 transgenic mice immunized with vaccinia virus responded only to HRP2(74-82) at 1 week and to all three epitopes by ex vivo enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay at 4 weeks postimmunization. To determine if these epitopes could elicit a protective CD8(+) T-cell response, we challenged peptide-immunized HLA-A2.1 transgenic mice intranasally with a lethal dose of the WR strain of vaccinia virus. HRP2(74-82) peptide-immunized mice recovered from infection, while naïve mice died. Depletion of CD8(+) T cells eliminated protection. Protection of HHD-2 mice, lacking mouse class I major histocompatibility complex molecules, implicates CTLs restricted by human HLA-A2.1 as mediators of protection. These results suggest that HRP2(74-82), which is shared between vaccinia and variola viruses, may be a CD8(+) T-cell epitope of vaccinia virus that will provide cross-protection against smallpox in HLA-A2.1-positive individuals, representing almost half the population.

Shared modes of protection against poxvirus infection by attenuated and conventional smallpox vaccine viruses.

The concern about bioterrorism with smallpox has raised the possibility of widespread vaccination, but the greater prevalence of immunocompromised individuals today requires a safer vaccine, and the mechanisms of protection are not well understood. Here we show that, at sufficient doses, the protection provided by both modified vaccinia Ankara and NYVAC replication-deficient vaccinia viruses, safe in immunocompromised animals, was equivalent to that of the licensed Wyeth vaccine strain against a pathogenic vaccinia virus intranasal challenge of mice. A similar variety and pattern of immune responses were involved in protection induced by modified vaccinia Ankara and Wyeth viruses. For both, antibody was essential to protect against disease, whereas neither effector CD4+ nor CD8+ T cells were necessary or sufficient. However, in the absence of antibody, T cells were necessary and sufficient for survival and recovery. Also, T cells played a greater role in control of sublethal infection in unimmunized animals. These properties, shared with the existing smallpox vaccine, provide a basis for further evaluation of these replication-deficient vaccinia viruses as safer vaccines against smallpox or against complications from vaccinia virus.

Molecular mechanisms and biological significance of CTL avidity.

CD8 CTLs are a major effector for protection against cancer as well as many infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS. CD8 CTL recognize antigenic peptides in the context of class I MHC. CTL functional avidity has been shown to be an important determinant of in vivo efficacy. CTL that can recognize peptide/MHC only at high antigen density are termed low avidity CTL, while those that can recognize their cognate antigen at low densities are termed high avidity CTL. Recent studies have demonstrated that high avidity CTLs are essential for the effective clearance of viral infections and for the elimination of tumor cells. At this time, approaches that can target high avidity cells for expansion in vivo are not well defined; however, new insights are beginning to emerge. A recent study has shown that prime-boost immunization may be an effective method to generate high avidity CTLs that recognize HIV antigens. In addition, we recently found that high levels of costimulation (signal 2) can skew the CTL response toward higher avidity cells. Thus, vectors expressing a triad of costimulatory molecules (TRICOM) or dendritic cells expressing higher levels of costimulatory molecules, can be used to induce high avidity CTL. Finally a critical role for CD4+ T cell help in the generation of high avidity cells has recently been identified (Palmer, manuscript submitted). While high avidity CTLs are superior for viral and tumor clearance, they also have a greater sensitivity to antigen induced cell death. In some types of chronic infections, such as HIV and HCV, as well as in cancer, the host may lose, by clonal exhaustion or other apoptotic mechanisms, the effector cells that are most critical to viral or tumor clearance. In this review, we examine the current knowledge concerning CTL avidity. We discuss the factors that may distinguish high avidity CTLs from low avidity CTLs and describe some of the mechanisms these cells use to clear viral infections. In addition, we study possible immunization strategies that may be used to elicit higher avidity CTLs and describe what is known about the factors that render these cells more susceptible to apoptosis than low avidity CTLs. Finally, we will incorporate these various elements into a general discussion of possible approaches for induction and maintenance of an effective immune response that can result in clearance of tumors or chronic viral infections and the relevance to vaccine development.