Comparing the outcomes of bedside percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation by ProGlide and Manta in a high-ECMO-volume center in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) decannulation with different percutaneous closure devices has been increasing. At our center, ProGlide devices have been used since November 2018, and Manta devices became an alternative since March 2020. This study aimed to compare the success and complication rates and the clinical outcomes of ProGlide and Manta devices for VA-ECMO decannulation after arteriotomy wound closure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of bedside VA-ECMO decannulation between November 2018 and June 2021. Patients with VA-ECMO who could be bridged to recovery were recruited and divided into the ProGlide or Manta group based on the closure device used. Procedure time, amount of blood loss, amount of blood products transfused, and use of vasoactive medications during the procedure were documented. Clinical examination and Doppler ultrasound were performed to detect any complications. RESULTS: After the closure technique, ProGlide was used in 44 patients and Manta was used in 13. There was no significant difference in the success rate between the ProGlide and Manta groups (86.4% vs. 100%). Amount of blood loss was greater in the ProGlide group than in the Manta group (290 [100-400] ml vs. 50 [50-100] ml), and more patients in the ProGlide group required an increased dose of inotropes during the procedure (59.1% vs. 15.4%), but the transfusion requirement was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of hemostasis using arteriotomy wound closure during VA-ECMO decannulation was similar between the two devices.

Predictive factors for high-flow nasal cannula failure in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in an intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), a relatively new technique in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), is gaining popularity in intensive care units (ICUs). Our study aims to identify the predictive factors for failure of HFNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a 5-year retrospective cohort study in patients with AHRF using HFNC in an ICU of a regional hospital in Hong Kong. The primary outcome is to identify the predictive factors for failure of HFNC which is defined as escalation of treatment to noninvasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or death. RESULTS: Of the 124 ICU patients with AHRF, 69 (55.65%) failed in the use of HFNC. The patients failing HFNC had higher Acute physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV scores, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, lower platelet counts and serum sodium levels upon ICU admission, and higher pH on day of HFNC commencement. They had higher respiratory rates before HFNC and higher heart rates before and 1 h after HFNC. The respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index which is defined as a ratio of SpO2/FiO2 to respiratory rate was significantly lower in the failure group 1 h and 12 h after HFNC. By multivariate binary logistic regression, failure of HFNC is associated with lower ROX index at 12 h after HFNC. CONCLUSION: ROX index at 12 h serves as a valuable tool to monitor the responsiveness to HFNC treatment. Close monitoring is required to identify patient failing using HFNC.

Survival of mechanically ventilated ward patients and association with organisational factors: a multicentre prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Determine 90-day mortality of mechanically ventilated ward patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU) and its association with organisational factors. DESIGN: Multicentre prospective observational study of mechanically ventilated ward patients. Modified Poisson regression was used to assess association between nurse to patient ratio (NPR) and 90-day mortality, adjusted for designated medical team, Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) triage priority and centre effect. NPR was divided into low (1:9.6 to 1:10), medium (1:6 to 1:8) and high (1:2.6). Sensitivity analysis was conducted for pneumonia with or without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to assess magnitude of association. SETTING: 7 acute public hospitals in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: All 485 mechanically ventilated patients in wards from participating hospitals between 18 January 2016 and 17 April 2016 were recruited. Three hundred patients were included after excluding patients with limitation of therapy within 24 hours of intubation. MAIN OUTCOMES: 90-day mortality, Mortality Prediction Model III Standardised mortality ratio (MPMIII0 SMR). RESULTS: 201 patients died within 90 days after intubation (67.0%, 95% CI 61.5% to 72.1%), with MPMIII0 SMR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.17. Compared with high NPR, medium and low NPRs were associated with higher risk of 90-day mortality (adjusted relative risk (RRadj) 1.84, 95% CI 1.70 to 1.99 and 1.64, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.83, respectively). For 114 patients with pneumonia with or without ARDS, low to medium NPR, too sick to benefit from ICU (SCCM priority 4b), no ICU consultation and designated medical team were associated with risk of 90-day mortality (RRadj 1.49, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.58; RRadj 1.60, 95% CI 1.49 to 1.72; RRadj 1.34, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.40; RRadj 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 90-day mortality rates of mechanically ventilated ward patients were high. NPR was an independent predictor of survival for mechanically ventilated ward patients.

Case report of successful peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient with chronic type B aortic dissection.

A case report of successful application of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient with chronic type B aortic dissection and myocardial stunning to bridge to recovery was presented. Good outcomes from the application of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in aortic dissection have rarely been reported, and the considerations of starting veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in this situation were seldom discussed. The orthodox that peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an absolute contraindication for initiation of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be challenged. With proper planning and real-time transesophageal echocardiography-guided cannulation, peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is possibly beneficial. The considerations and echocardiography-guided techniques would be discussed in this report.

Real-time ultrasound-guided bedside closure of arteriotomy wound using MANTA closure device during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation.

Percutaneous closure of arteriotomy wound during peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation was shown to be safe and allow earlier mobilization. The new MantaTM vascular closure device (Essential Medical), designed for the closure of arterotomy wound created by large-bore vascular sheaths up to 25Fr during endovascular catheterization procedures, was reported to be applicable in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation. In this article, we would like to share our experience of using real-time ultrasound guidance to ensure the safe application of Manta during bedside venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation.

One-year experience of bedside percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation in a high-ECMO-volume center in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: When veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support can be terminated, open repair of arteriotomy wounds in operating theaters is the standard of practice. Comparable outcomes by percutaneous decannulation using different closure devices have been reported. However, transport of the critically- ill, man-power and timeslots of operating theaters could be saved if decannulation was performed at bedside. METHOD: Bedside percutaneous arteriotomy wound closure became our default method of decannulation since November 2018. We reviewed our 1-year data to evaluate if such practice could be safely adopted in a local high-ECMO-volume center. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and October 2019, 25 patients had their VA-ECMO terminated at the bedside. Twenty-one patients (84%) had successful decannulation. For those who failed, emergency open repair resulted in no additional complications. Two ProGlide devices were used in 15 (71.4%) patients and three were used in 6 (28.6%) patients. The procedure time was 27 (15-45) min. The median blood loss was 300 mL (250-400). Minor complications were found in 4 (19.1%) patients, including two arterial clot formation, one pseudoaneurysm and one wound infection. There were no other major complications. CONCLUSION: Our 1-year experience showed that percutaneous bedside VA-ECMO decannulation was feasible to commence in a local large-ECMO-volume center.