Health-related quality of life in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the UK: a cross-sectional study from pre- to post-infection.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time among individuals in the United Kingdom, adding to the evidence base that had focussed on severe COVID-19. METHODS: A bespoke online survey was administered to individuals who self-reported a positive COVID-19 test. An amended version of a validated generic HRQoL instrument (EQ-5D-5L) was used to measure HRQoL retrospectively at different timepoints over the course of an infection: pre-COVID-19, acute COVID-19, and long COVID. In addition, HRQoL post-COVID-19 was captured by the original EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. A mixed-effects model was used to estimate changes in HRQoL over time, adjusted for a range of variables correlated with HRQoL. RESULTS: The study recruited 406 participants: (i) 300 adults and 53 adolescents with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who had not been hospitalised for COVID-19 during acute COVID-19, and (ii) 53 adults who had been hospitalised for COVID-19 in the acute phase and who had been recruited for validation purposes. Data were collected between January and April 2022. Among participants included in the base-case analysis, EQ-5D-5L utility scores were lower during both acute COVID-19 (ß=-0.080, p = 0.001) and long COVID (ß=-0.072, p < 0.001) compared to pre COVID-19. In addition, EQ-5D-5L utility scores post-COVID-19 were found to be similar to the EQ-5D-5L utility scores before COVID-19, including for patients who had been hospitalised for COVID-19 during the acute phase or for those who had experienced long COVID. Moreover, being hospitalised in the acute phase was associated with additional utility decrements during both acute COVID-19 (ß=-0.147, p = 0.026) and long (ß=-0.186, p < 0.001) COVID. CONCLUSION: Patients perceived their HRQoL to have varied significantly over the course of a mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection. However, HRQoL was found to return to pre-COVID-19 levels, even for patients who had been hospitalised for COVID-19 during the acute phase or for those who had experienced long COVID.

Quality of life study for caregivers of people with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures.

AIM: The aim of this study was to capture and measure the impact of caregiving for an adult with uncontrolled drug-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS) on the caregivers' quality of life (QoL), and to quantify the costs of productivity losses associated with providing informal care in this patient population. METHODS: An online survey, which included the EQ-5D-5L, CarerQol-7D and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific-Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaires, was administered to caregivers of individuals with uncontrolled drug-resistant FOS in the United Kingdom (UK), France, Spain, Germany, Italy, and Sweden. RESULTS: The study included 345 caregivers. Most were males, aged between 25 and 34 years old whose caring responsibilities took between 15 and 24 h per week. The caregivers' mean EQ-5D-5L score was 0.6, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of [0.58, 0.63], whilst the mean CarerQol-7D score was 72.61 [70.46, 74.76]. Caregivers' mental health was the most substantially affected aspect of their QoL. In addition, most caregivers reported deriving some or a lot of fulfilment out of their caregiving tasks. The WPAI:SHP showed that the mean percentage of work impairment due to caregiving responsibilities was 63%, [59.75, 66.26]. The mean annualised costs of productivity losses per caregiver were estimated at €14,872 [€11,908; €17,888]. LIMITATIONS: One limitation consisted in the use of an online survey instead of a face-to-face interview. However, the medical terms were clearly explained, and examples were provided to help participants to give accurate responses. Another limitation was that the respondents self-reported as caregivers. Efforts were made to mitigate this weakness by using screener questions. CONCLUSION: This study found that providing informal care for people with uncontrolled drug-resistant FOS had a negative impact on caregivers' QoL, with mental health being affected the most. However, caregivers found their role fulfilling and had support with their caring tasks.

Estimation of Health-Related Utilities for 177Lu-DOTATATE in GEP-NET Patients Using Utilities Mapped from EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D Utilities.

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) are a rare, life-threatening type of cancer. The survival benefit of 177Lu-DOTATATE has been demonstrated in GEP-NET patients. Health technology assessment bodies require data on health-related utility impacts of treatment. A cancer-specific instrument, EORTC QLQ-C30, was used to collect the data for 177Lu-DOTATATE within clinical studies, but utility-based instruments were not included. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to compare EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities obtained from EORTC QLQ-C30 using two different approaches. A secondary aim was to analyse the EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities of patients treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE versus best supportive care. A supplementary aim was to evaluate the effect of 177Lu-DOTATATE on patients' health-related utility over time. METHODS: Three datasets were used for the analysis. NETTER-1 is a clinical trial, whilst ERASMUS and Guy's and St. Thomas (GStT) are real-world datasets. Two mapping algorithms (response mapping and ordinary least square regression) were applied to generate EQ-5D-3L utilities from EORTC QLQ-C30. An algorithm was used to obtain QLU-C10D utilities from EORTC QLQ-C30. RESULTS: In all studies, EQ-5D-3L utilities were higher than QLU-C10D utilities at most time points measured, although the magnitude of the differences was small. In NETTER-1, EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities were higher in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with the octreotide long-acting release (LAR) arm, overall and pre-progression. In all studies, patients' health-related utilities seem to be maintained over time. CONCLUSION: There were small differences between EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities, but these did not translate to relative differences over time or between groups. In NETTER-1, patients in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm had higher health-related utilities than patients in the octreotide LAR arm. Health-related utility may at least remain maintained in patients with GEP-NET receiving 177Lu-DOTATATE.