Real-world outcomes of abiraterone and enzalutamide in first-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: which patients benefit most?

OBJECTIVES: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are two oral novel androgen receptor axis-targeted agents approved for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Despite the availability of multiple treatments, there is a need to improve the knowledge and management of these drugs in the real-world setting, especially in patient groups under-represented in clinical trials. Our aim was to review the outcome of patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide in routine clinical practice in order to identify factors that are predictive for response. METHODS: This observational retrospective study was performed in a Spanish tertiary hospital and included men with chemotherapy-naïve mCPRC who started treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide between September 2012 and November 2018. The study end date was 30 October 2020. RESULTS: Ninety patients with mCRPC were included, 57 with abiraterone and 33 with enzalutamide. Median overall survival (OS) was 26.87 months (95% CI 19.68 to 34.05), with no difference found between the two treatment groups. Nine variables were related to increased OS in the univariate analysis: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0-1 vs 2), pain (need of opioids for cancer pain), visceral disease, ≥3 bone lesions, exclusively lymph node metastases, baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) (<50 vs ≥50 ng/dL and <20 vs ≥20 ng/dL), haemoglobin (<12 vs ≥12 g/dL) and alkaline phosphatase (≤116 vs >116 IU/L). A PSA response >50% was observed in 65 patients (76.5%). In the multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status, pain, visceral disease and alkaline phosphatase provided independent prognostic information. Median OS by Kaplan-Meier analysis was significantly longer for patients with a PSA response (32.1 vs 17.9 months; HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed the efficacy of abiraterone and enzalutamide in a real-world setting, including patients under-represented in pivotal studies. Some clinical factors were correlated with improved OS in chemotherapy-naïve men with mCPRC treated with these drugs.

Safety and effectiveness of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for vitamin K antagonist reversal following a fixed-dose strategy.

OBJECTIVES: Early reversal of anticoagulation improves outcomes in major bleeding and emergency surgery. To reverse vitamin K antagonists (VKA), vitamin K in addition to prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is recommended. Dosing recommendations for VKA reversal provided by the manufacturer are 25-50 IU/kg depending on the baseline international normalised ratio (INR). Nevertheless, we recommend an initial fixed dose of 1000 IU, and additional 500 IU doses evaluated on a case-by-case basis. As there is a paucity of clinical data demonstrating the efficacy and safety of this strategy, we designed this study to assess the effectiveness and safety of a four-factor (4F)-PCC for VKA reversal following a fixed-dose strategy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who received 4F-PCC for VKA reversal. The primary outcome was INR correction. INR correction was achieved if the first INR draw after 4F-PCC was ≤1.5. Safety outcome was any confirmed thromboembolic event within 3 months after 4F-PCC. Secondary outcomes included activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) correction, as well as haemostatic effectiveness for bleeding patients. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included: 106 (73.1%) in the bleeding group and 39 (26.9%) in the emergency surgery group. The INR target was reached in 102 (70.3%) patients (p<0.0001). In one case, a thromboembolic complication was possibly related to 4F-PCC. The aPTT ratio target was reached in 113 (77.9%) patients (p<0.0001), and 79 of the 106 (74.5%) patients reversed for bleeding achieved haemostatic effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: After 4F-PCC, the majority of patients achieved the target INR, meaning 4F-PCC is a useful modality for rapid INR reduction. The safety profile may be considered acceptable. Fixed-dose 4F-PCC was able to restore haemostasis rapidly while minimising the risk of adverse events and optimising available resources.

Intraocular minocycline for the treatment of ocular pythiosis.

PURPOSE: A case of ocular pythiosis successfully treated with surgery and intraocular and oral minocycline is reported. SUMMARY: A 30-year-old man who wore corrective contact lenses traveled to Brazil and Colombia where he swam in salt and fresh waters while wearing contact lenses. He sought treatment at an emergency department after 2 weeks of suffering with a painful corneal ulcer, redness, and loss of vision in his right eye that had been treated at other centers with ophthalmic moxifloxacin for 10 days and with fortified topical antibiotics (amikacin and vancomycin) for 2 days. Examination using a slit lamp revealed a deep central corneal ulcer with surrounding white infiltrate, endothelial plaque, and hypopyon. Due to infection severity, the patient was admitted and received empirical antibiotic therapy and i.v. and topical antifungals. During the first corneal transplantation, the patient's original infection relapsed and was treated with voriconazole and liposomal amphotericin B intraocular injections. A subsequent infection developed, and a second keratoplasty was performed. One month after hospital admission, the patient was diagnosed with ocular pythiosis and therapy with oral minocycline was initiated. After severe infection relapse in the anterior chamber, the patient underwent a third penetrating keratoplasty, where minocycline intraocular injection was administered. After this intervention, complete infection control was achieved, and the patient was discharged 45 days after admission with oral minocycline and 1% cyclosporine and 0.3% ofloxacin eye drops. CONCLUSION: A patient with ocular pythiosis was successfully treated with penetrating keratoplasty and 2 months of treatment with intracameral and oral minocycline.

Analysis of antiretroviral therapy modification in routine clinical practice in the management of HIV infection.

OBJECTIVES: The main goal was to assess the reasons for antiretroviral therapy (ART) change in patients with HIV in a hospital setting in routine clinical practice. The economic impact of ART modification was also analysed. METHODS: Patients with HIV who changed their ART between 24 November and 24 December 2014 were registered. Length of initial therapy, type of ART before and after therapy modification, and reasons for the ART change were analysed. To assess the economic impact, antiretroviral drug costs at the time of the study were recorded. RESULTS: Of a cohort of 3850 patients with HIV, 1976 attended for pharmaceutical care consultation at Hospital Universitario La Paz during the study period. Ninety-two patients (4.7%) had their ART modified. The median length of the previous therapy was 26 months (range 1-144). The most common initial therapy regimen was 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)+1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) (29.4%), and the most common one after modification was 2 NRTI+1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) (40.2%). Forty-three modifications were made because of toxicity and adverse effects (46.7%), 25 because of therapy simplification (27.2%), 16 because of treatment failure (17.4%), and 8 because of drug-drug interactions (8.7%). ART costs increased by a mean of €14 (SD €216; range -€528 to +€831) per month per patient after therapy modification at the time of study. CONCLUSIONS: Toxicity and adverse effects were the most common reason for ART alteration in patients with HIV in routine clinical practice in a hospital setting. Better knowledge about factors that motivate these changes may contribute to decreased toxicity and increased treatment success. ART modification had a variable but not very substantial economic impact.