Identifying High-Attenuating and Low-Attenuating Muscle Using Computerized Tomography and Exploring Its Impact on Physical Function and Muscle Strength in Obese Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) methods to estimate sarcopenia in obesity do not differentiate high-attenuating from low-attenuating muscle. The primary purpose of this study was to determine agreement between a CT method using general workstation-derived total and high-attenuating psoas muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and a commercially available segmentation software-derived value. Secondary purpose was to explore the relationship between quantity of high-attenuating muscle to physical functioning in a pilot cohort of obese medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cross-sectional study. CT images of obese MICU patients were reconstructed to calculate total psoas muscle, low-attenuating muscle, and high-attenuating muscle within the third lumbar psoas CSA using a CT method and commercial software. We performed blinded outcome measures of CSA, physical function, and muscle strength in 28 patients. RESULTS: Concordance correlation coefficient for identifying total psoas muscle was 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98, P-value < 0.0001) between CT method and commercial software. There was moderate correlation between modified Medical Research Council muscle strength scores and high-attenuating psoas muscle CSA (r = 0.47, P = 0.01) and lower extremity strength and high-attenuating psoas muscle CSA (r = 0.40, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: There was strong agreement between our CT method and a commercial software method to identify total psoas muscle CSA in obesity. Greater total high-attenuating psoas CSA moderately correlated with muscle strength. Additional studies using more objective markers of muscle strength validating these findings are needed.

Role of Physical Therapists in the Management of Individuals at Risk for or Diagnosed With Venous Thromboembolism: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline.

The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), in conjunction with the Cardiovascular & Pulmonary and Acute Care sections of APTA, have developed this clinical practice guideline to assist physical therapists in their decision-making process when treating patients at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) or diagnosed with a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LE DVT). No matter the practice setting, physical therapists work with patients who are at risk for or have a history of VTE. This document will guide physical therapist practice in the prevention of, screening for, and treatment of patients at risk for or diagnosed with LE DVT. Through a systematic review of published studies and a structured appraisal process, key action statements were written to guide the physical therapist. The evidence supporting each action was rated, and the strength of statement was determined. Clinical practice algorithms, based on the key action statements, were developed that can assist with clinical decision making. Physical therapists, along with other members of the health care team, should work to implement these key action statements to decrease the incidence of VTE, improve the diagnosis and acute management of LE DVT, and reduce the long-term complications of LE DVT.

Restoring functional status: a long-term case report of severe lung and ventilatory muscle pump dysfunction involving recurrent bacterial pneumonias.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prolonged mechanical ventilation contributes to immobility and deconditioning making efforts to safely discontinue ventilator support desirable. This case report documents how implementing physical therapy treatment interventions, based on the Guide to Physical Therapist Practice, can help to restore a person's functional status even after multiple years of mechanical ventilation dependency. CASE DESCRIPTION: A patient (female; aged 63 years) with severe restrictive and obstructive ventilatory impairment has survived 34 recurrent pneumonias involving 6 bacterial pathogens while being mechanically ventilated at home. A 3-year study was approved and informed consent obtained for a home exercise program of resistive extremity and inspiratory muscle training along with exercise reconditioning. Tolerable distances walked, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures, hours spent on versus off mechanical ventilation, activities performed within and around her home, and community excursions taken were charted. OUTCOMES: Daily time tolerated off the ventilator improved from less than one to 12 hours, distance walked in 6 minutes increased 33%, and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures improved 62% and 9.6% respectively. These improvements made out-of-home social excursions possible. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This patient's functional status improved following multiple physical therapy interventions dictated by the evaluation of initial physical therapy examination findings according to the Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Long term mechanical ventilator dependency in the home environment did not exclude this patient from achieving clinically significant gains in functional status even when having severe restrictive and obstructive ventilator impairment.

Perspective paper: assessing air quality as part of a physical therapy plan of care.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this clinical perspective paper are (1) to expand physical therapists' awareness to the topic of air quality as a health priority when providing professional services; and (2) to provide templates for screening the indoor clinical environments and patient profiles to avert respiratory exacerbations, especially in persons with asthma. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS: The location where a physical therapist practices determines the air quality indices to which a person is exposed. Poor indoor air quality can expose a person to even greater compromise of respiration (ie, Sick Building Syndrome) than outdoor air quality secondary to an array of factors like building materials, the ventilation exchange rate of an enclosed space, chemicals used in cleaning, and humidity. Statement of Conclusions: Extrinsic (ie, environmental) and intrinsic (eg, pre-disposition to airway hypersensitivity) factors must be accounted for by physical therapists to safeguard their patients and themselves from experiencing respiratory compromise and/or distress as a result of a treatment session or their place of employment. RECOMMENDATIONS: Efforts to screen indoor environments for potential triggers and patient risk profiles for abnormal airway reactivity should routinely be undertaken. Individualized Action Plans should be prospectively prepared and readied for implementation when warranted.