Acute Lower Limb Ischemia as Clinical Presentation of COVID-19 Infection.

Novel 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) infection usually causes a respiratory disease that may vary in severity from mild symptoms to severe pneumonia with multiple organ failure. Coagulation abnormalities are frequent, and reports suggest that COVID-19 may predispose to venous and arterial thrombotic complications. We report a case of acute lower limb ischemia and resistance to heparin as the onset of COVID-19 disease, preceding the development of respiratory failure. This case highlights that the shift of coagulation profile toward hypercoagulability was associated with the acute ischemic event and influenced the therapy.

Transposition of the left vertebral artery during endovascular stent-graft repair of the aortic arch.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present our experience with the management of isolated left vertebral artery during hybrid aortic arch repairs with thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion. METHODS: This is a single-center, observational, cohort study. Between January 2007 and December 2018, 9 patients (4.5%) of 200 who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair were identified with isolated left vertebral artery. The isolated left vertebral artery was the dominant vertebral artery in 4 cases and entered the Circle of Willis to form the basilar artery in all cases. Isolated left vertebral artery transposition was performed in 2 patients during open ascending/arch repair before thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion. In 4 patients, isolated left vertebral artery transposition was performed concomitant with carotid-subclavian bypass during thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion ("zone 2" thoracic endovascular aortic repair). Primary outcomes were early (<30 days) and late survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality, and isolated left vertebral artery patency. RESULTS: Primary technical success was achieved in all cases. Isolated left vertebral artery-related complication occurred in 1 patient (Horner syndrome). Immediate thrombosis, vagus/recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, lymphocele, and chylothorax were never observed. Postoperative cerebrovascular accident or spinal cord injury was not observed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range, 3-72). We did not observe aortic-related mortality during the follow-up. Aortic-related intervention was never required. Both isolated left vertebral artery and carotid-subclavian bypass are still patent in all patients with no sign of anastomotic pseudoaneurysm or stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although isolated left vertebral artery is not a frequent occurrence, it is not so rare. It may pose additional difficulties during hybrid aortic arch surgical repairs, but isolated left vertebral artery transposition was feasible, safe, and a durable reconstruction.

Arch and access vessel complications in penetrating aortic ulcer managed with thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: To analyze our experience and to describe access and arch-related challenges when performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs). METHODS: This is a single-center, observational, cohort study. Between October 2003 and February 2019, 48 patients with PAU were identified; 37 (77.1%) treated with TEVAR were retrospectively analyzed. Primary major outcomes were early (<30 days) and late survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), and a composite endpoint of arch/vascular access-related complications. RESULTS: On admission, 17 (45.9%) patients were symptomatic with 4 (10.8%) presenting with rupture. In-hospital mortality was 8.1% (n=3). We observed 10 (27.0%) arch/access-related complications. There were 4 (10.8%) arch issues: 2 transient ischemic attacks and 2 retrograde acute type A dissections which required emergent open conversion for definitive repair. Access issues occurred in 6 (16.2%) patients: 3 (8.1%) required common iliac artery conduit, and 1 (2.7%) patient required iliac artery angioplasty to deliver the stent-graft. In addition, 2 (5.4%) patients developed access complications which required operative repair [femoral patch angioplasty (n=2), and femoral pseudoaneurysmectomy (n=1)]. Arch/access-related mortality rate was 5.4% (n=2) and median follow-up was 24 (range, 1-156; IQR, 3-52) months. Estimated survival was 87.1% (standard error: 0.6; 95% CI: 71.2-84.9%) at 1 year, and 63.3% (SE: 0.9; 95% CI: 44.1-79%) at 4 years. Estimated freedom from reintervention was 88.9% (SE: 0.5; 95% CI: 74.8-95.6%) at 1 year, and 84.2% (SE: 0.7; 95% CI: 67.3-93.2%) at 4 years. No arch/access-related issues developed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that vascular access and aortic arch issues are still a challenging aspect of performing TEVAR for PAUs. Our cumulative 27% rate of access/arch issues is lower than previously reported due to both technological advancements and meticulous management of both access routes and arch anatomy.

Outcome of iliocaval resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the oncologic and surgical outcomes of patients treated with inferior vena cava (IVC) or iliac vein (IV) resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Surgery is the only curative option for patients with primary RPS. The IVC or IV can be directly invaded by RPS or can be the organ of origin of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. In both cases, resection of the IVC or IV is required to achieve a complete resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent IVC or IV resection for primary or recurrent RPS between 2000 and 2016 at a single referral institution were included in this retrospective study. The oncologic outcome was explored in terms of overall survival and crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Surgical outcomes were explored in terms of complications, renal function, lower limb edema, and vascular graft patency. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included: 24 IV resections (IV group), 39 IVC resections, and 4 IVC and IV resections (IVC group). The most frequent histologic types were leiomyosarcoma (63%) and liposarcoma (27%). Five-year overall survival, CCI of local recurrence, and CCI of distant metastasis (95% confidence interval) were 56.2% (43.6-72.4), 12.4% (5.2-29.5), and 51.5% (39.3-67.5). IVC was circumferentially resected in 38 of 43 patients; 32 were treated with graft reconstruction (22 with interposition of banked venous homograft [BVH] and 10 with polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE] graft) and 6 with ligation only, mostly dependent on the presence of an adequate collateral vessel network. Patients with preoperative IVC obstruction treated with ligation only (n = 6) did not develop severe postoperative lower limb edema. IVC graft primary patency at 5 years was 100% in IVC PTFE grafts and 76.7% in IVC BVHs. Fifteen patients (22.4%) suffered a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complication within 60 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: IVC or IV resection in the context of RPS surgery is of value in achieving long-term survival. A policy of vascular grafting in case of circumferential resection of a patent IVC or IV is rewarding. For IVC reconstruction, both BVHs and PTFE grafts offer good results in terms of high patency rate and low risk of infection.