Buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year.

The purposes of this study were to assess outcomes of patients prescribed buprenorphine at a primary care practice and to identify factors associated with favorable outcomes. All 255 patients given at least one prescription for buprenorphine between August 2003 and September 1, 2007, at a primary care practice in Baltimore were included. Data regarding demographics and comorbidities were collected retrospectively. Patients were classified as "opioid-positive" or "opioid-negative" each month based on patient report, urine toxicology, and provider assessment. After 12 months, 145 (56.9%) patients remained in treatment, and 64.7% of their months were opioid-negative. Patients using heroin were less likely to be opioid-negative, whereas those using prescription opioids were more likely to be opioid-negative. Polysubstance use was associated with increased treatment retention. The prescription of buprenorphine for opioid dependence treatment can be incorporated into primary care practice, and many patients, including polysubstance users, benefit from this treatment.

Treatment completion on an inpatient detoxification unit: impact of a change to sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone.

PURPOSE: Buprenorphine is commonly used for opioid detoxification. The goal of this study was to determine whether a change from the intramuscular (IM) buprenorphine to the sublingual (SL) formulation of buprenorphine-naloxone was associated with improved treatment completion rates on an inpatient detoxification unit. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (JHBMC) Chemical Dependence Unit (CDU), a 26-bed, 3-day inpatient detoxification unit providing detoxification from opioids, alcohol, and sedatives. The opioid detoxification protocol was changed from IM buprenorphine (0.3 mg bid for 3 days) to SL buprenorphine-naloxone (8, 8, and 6 mg on sequential days, plus 2 mg on the morning of discharge). For the 3 months prior to and after the change in protocol, data were collected retrospectively on demographics, type of dependence being treated, and type of discharge. FINDINGS: A total of 1,168 patients were admitted to the JHBMC CDU during the period studied. In the 3 months prior to the change in buprenorphine protocol, 353 of 483 patients admitted for treatment of opioid dependence (73.1%) completed treatment, compared with 407 of 473 patients admitted after the change (86.0%); this difference was highly significant (p < .0001). Among 212 patients who did not receive treatment for opioid dependence over the same period, the rates of treatment completion did not change significantly (89.8% before vs. 83.0% after; p = .208). CONCLUSIONS: A change from IM buprenorphine to SL buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid detoxification was associated with a significant improvement in completion rates at this inpatient treatment program.