Immune memory to hepatitis B virus in 4-9-year old children vaccinated in infancy with four doses of hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine.

The combined hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) vaccine produces similar hepatitis B responses as the HBV monovalent vaccine. Booster vaccination of immunocompetent individuals primed against hepatitis B in infancy is currently not recommended. We investigated persisting immunity to hepatitis B in 4-6 (Study A; 106745) and 7-9 (Study B; 106744) year-old children primed in infancy and boosted in the second year of life with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib. Immunity was assessed by measuring persisting anti-HBs antibodies and evaluating the response to a challenge dose of HBV vaccine. At 4-6 years of age 86.0% of 186 subjects had persisting anti-HBs > or =10 mIU/ml increasing to 98.4% after the challenge. At 7-9 years of age, 78.0% of 186 subjects continued to have anti-HBs antibody concentrations > or =10 mIU/ml, increasing to 98.9% after the challenge. In both studies anti-HBs antibody GMC rose >80-fold. An anamnestic response to the HBV challenge was observed in 95.7% and 98.9% of subjects in Studies A and B, respectively. In both studies, 87% of 38 subjects with initially undetectable circulating anti-HBs antibodies (>3.3 IU/ml) achieved the 10 mIU/ml threshold after challenge; > or =97.0% of subjects with detectable antibodies before the challenge at least quadrupled their concentration. Post-vaccination anti-HBs concentrations were directly related to persisting antibody concentrations and the concentrations achieved after the booster dose in the second year of life. The HBV vaccine challenge dose was well tolerated. These studies show that primary and booster vaccination with combined DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib (Infanrix hexa) induces sustained immune memory against hepatitis B up to age 9 years.

Immunogenicity and safety assessments after one and two doses of a refrigerator-stable tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine in healthy children during the second year of life.

BACKGROUND: Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) and varicella (V) vaccines are often coadministered at 1 clinic visit. This study (104389/NCT00127023) was undertaken to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a new refrigerator-stable tetravalent MMRV vaccine after 1 dose and after 2 doses administered during the second year of life. METHODS: Nine hundred seventy healthy children aged 10-21 months received 2 doses of MMRV vaccine (Priorix-Tetra; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) 42 days apart (MMRV group; N = 732) or 1 dose of MMR vaccine (Priorix) coadministered with varicella vaccine (Varilrix) followed by a second dose of only MMR vaccine 42 days later (MMR + V group; N = 238). RESULTS: Observed seroconversion rates for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella antibodies 42 days postdose 1 were 94.5%, 96.1%, 99.7%, 95.5% in the MMRV group and 93.4%, 93.6%, 98.1%, 95.6% in the MMR + V group. Respective seroconversion rates postdose 2 were 98.3%, 99.4%, 99.7%, 99.7% in the MMRV group and 97.6%, 99.5%, 100%, 97.5% in the MMR + V group. Observed antimeasles and antimumps geometric mean titers (GMTs) were higher after each dose in the MMRV group than in the MMR + V group. Antivaricella GMT increased 21-fold in the MMRV group postdose 2, and was markedly higher than in the MMR + V group who did not receive a second dose of varicella (1903.3 and 80.3 dilution, respectively). Both vaccine regimens were generally well-tolerated in terms of local reactions, fever >39.5 degrees C, and vaccine-related rashes. CONCLUSIONS: Both after 1 dose and after 2 doses, the MMRV vaccine was at least as immunogenic as concomitant MMR and varicella vaccination suggesting that it could be suitable for use according to current vaccination schedules.

Booster vaccination and 1-year follow-up of 4-8-year-old children with a reduced-antigen-content dTpa-IPV vaccine.

Reduced-antigen-content pertussis vaccines designed initially for booster vaccination of adolescents and adults can also be used to vaccinate pre-school age children. Combination vaccines, which reduce the number of administered injections, combine multiple antigens including inactivated poliovirus (IPV), which is recommended in this age group in some countries. This randomised, controlled study compared a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio-containing booster vaccine, dTpa-IPV (Boostrix Polio, n=822), to separately administered dTpa (Boostrix) and IPV (IPV Mérieux, n=136) in 4-8-year-old children who had previously received four doses of DTPa. Additional serological assessment was performed 1 year after the booster dose. One month after vaccination, seroprotection/vaccine response rates were similar for both groups. At least 99.9% of the subjects had protective antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus and polio, and at least 90.1% had a vaccine response to pertussis antigens after dTpa-IPV. Reactogenicity of dTpa-IPV was comparable to dTpa + IPV. Fever and grade 3 loss of appetite occurred more commonly after dTpa-IPV, whereas swelling and grade 3 pain occurred more frequently after separately administered dTpa + IPV (P<0.05 for all). However, 95% CIs overlapped in all cases. Large swelling reactions after dTpa-IPV occurred less commonly than have been reported after a fifth dose of DTPa. One year after the booster, 98.6% of the subjects tested continued to have protective antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus and polio, and at least 81.2% were seropositive for pertussis components. The reduced-antigen-content dTpa-IPV vaccine was immunogenic, well tolerated and safe in pre-school age children. It provides immunity against four diseases in a single injection, with the potential reactogenicity benefit of a reduced-antigen dose.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of four doses of diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio virus-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine coadministered with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: The 7-valent pneumococcal (7vPn) conjugate vaccine is licensed for primary and booster vaccination according to the same immunization schedules as routinely recommended diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-based childhood vaccines and can be coadministered during the same vaccination visit. METHODS: An open, randomized study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio virus-Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) vaccine and a 7vPn conjugate vaccine when coadministered at 2, 3 and 4 months and 12-23 months of age, compared with the administration of the hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine given alone. Serum antibody titers were measured before and 1 month after the primary course and before and 1 month after the booster dose. Solicited local and general adverse events were recorded for 4 days and unsolicited adverse events were recorded for 30 days after each vaccine dose. RESULTS: A total of 345 subjects were enrolled for primary vaccination with the hexavalent vaccine (170 without and 175 with the 7vPn vaccine coadministered) and 266 returned for booster vaccination (122 without and 144 with coadministration of the 7vPn vaccine). After primary vaccination, antibody responses against the common antigens were similar in both groups, with seroprotection rates of 93.6-100% and with similar antibody decay before booster vaccination. The fourth dose induced a vigorous booster response, with seroprotection/vaccine response rates of 96.8-100%. Response to the 7vPn primary and booster vaccination was within previously reported ranges. Differences in reactogenicity resulted from higher incidences of symptoms after concomitant vaccination. Rectal temperature >39.5 degrees C was observed after 1.2% of the coadministered vaccine doses during primary vaccination and after 2.8% of the booster vaccine doses. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib and 7vPn vaccines at separate injection sites during the same vaccination visit was effective and safe.

Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol inhaled via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler vs. a conventional metered dose inhaler plus spacer in children with asthma.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol hydrobromide (IB/FEN; Berodual) delivered from the novel propellant-free Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) with that from a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer in children with asthma. The study followed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind (within Respimat SMI), parallel-group design. During the 2-week run-in period, patients received two actuations of CFC-MDI tid (IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg per actuation) via a spacer (Aerochamber) (MDI 40/100). Patients (n=535) were then randomized to: Respimat SMI containing IB 10 microg/FEN 25 microg (Respimat SMI 10/25), IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg (Respimat SMI 20/50), one actuation tid or CFC-MDI containing IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg per actuation (in total 1B 40 microg/FEN 100 microg), or two actuations tid via Aerochamber (MDI 40/100), for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) during the first 60 min after dosing (area under the curve from 0-1 h [AUC(0-1 h)]) on day 29. Analysis of the primary endpoint demonstrated that the efficacy of Respimat SMI 10/25 and 20/50 was equivalent to or greater than that of MDI 40/100. Similar results indicating that Respimat SMI 10/25 and 20/50 were not inferior to MDI 40/100 were also found on days 1 and 15. Analyses of other secondary endpoints supported these results. The safety profile of Respimat SMI was comparable to that of the CFC-MDI plus spacer. In conclusion, IB/FEN delivered via Respimat SMI is at least as effective as, and is as safe as, when delivered via CFC-MDI plus Aerochamber in children with asthma. Use of Respimat SMI thus enables a 2-4-fold reduction in the nominal dose of IB/FEN, and obviates the need for a spacer.