The Effect of Osteotomy Preparation Technique and Implant Diameter on Primary Stability and Bone-implant Interface of Short Implants (6 mm).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of osteotomy preparation technique and implant diameter on primary stability and bone-implant interface of short implants (6mm), when placed in bone with high degree of cancellous content. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 90 short (S) implants (6 mm) divided in nine groups based on width (Narrow 4.2 mm, Regular 4.8 mm, Wide 5.4 mm) (N,R,W) and osteotomy preparation (Standard, Osteotome, Osseodensification) (ST, OT, OD) and placed in porcine tibia plateau bone samples: Group SN-ST; Group SN-OT; Group SN-OD; Group SRST; Group SR-OT; Group SR-OD; Group SW-ST; Group SW-OT and Group SW-OD. Insertion torque and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) were measured. Four implants from each group SNST, SN-OT, SN-OD were evaluated histomorphometrically. RESULTS: Insertion torque was significantly higher for implants of Group SW-OD compared to Group SW-ST (50.00 ±14.14 Ncm vs 28.00 ±10.85 Ncm, p= 0.005) and Group SW-OT compared to Group SW-ST (46.87 ±17.10 Ncm vs 28.00 ±10.85 Ncm, p=0.026). Insertion torque was significantly higher for implants of Group SW-OD compared to Group SN-OD (50.00 ±14.14 Ncm vs 31.5 ±15.82 Ncm, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed for the percentage of bone, marrow space and connective tissue in contact to the implant surface between studied groups. CONCLUSION: Osteotomy preparation technique at sites with high degree of cancellous content can influence the implant insertion torque for short and wide implants (5.4x6mm). Implant width can influence the insertion torque of short implants placed with the osseodensification technique.

Is it possible to extract lower third molars with infiltration anaesthesia techniques using articaine? A double-blind randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) with additional buccal infiltration (standard technique) and of buccal and lingual anaesthetic infiltration (experimental technique) for lower third molar (L3M) extractions. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised, double-blind clinical trial involving 129 L3M extractions was conducted. In the IANB group, an IANB was performed using the conventional approach, followed by a buccal injection in the extraction area. In the infiltration group (INF), an infiltration was performed in the buccal and lingual areas of the lower second molar. A 4% articaine solution was employed in all cases. The main outcome variable was anaesthetic efficacy. Other variables like intraoperative and postoperative pain, onset time and adverse events were also recorded. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of the data were made. RESULTS: 120 patients were randomised. The IANB group showed significantly higher anaesthetic efficacy than the INF group (64.4 vs. 45.8%) (odds ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.97; p = 0.042). No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: IANB with additional buccal infiltration is more suitable than the experimental technique for achieving adequate analgesia in L3M extractions. Moreover, the standard method is safe and provides a shorter onset time and lower initial postoperative pain levels.