RESUMO
Diagnoses of dry eye made with the Lactoplate Immunoassay Test (which assesses tear lactoferrin concentration) were compared to diagnoses based on dry eye symptoms, tear break-up times, and rose bengal staining. For a population of 49 subjects with normal and mild to moderate dry eyes, contingency tables showed that the lactoferrin-based diagnoses were not significantly related to the diagnoses made using any of the other factors. Lactoferrin concentrations were statistically correlated with symptom scores, but there was no significant correlation between lactoferrin concentrations and either tear break-up time or rose bengal staining. These results suggest that: 1) the dry eye problems in the subject population may not have been associated with lacrimal gland dysfunction (which the Lactoplate assesses); 2) Lactoplate tests are not sensitive enough to allow accurate diagnoses for the population of mild to moderate dry eye subjects used; 3) signs and symptoms associated with dry eyes occur before lactoferrin changes are manifest so lactoferrin changes had not yet appeared in the subjects; or 4) in mild to moderate dry eye subjects, lactoferrin changes occur only in reflexive tears and not in the basal tears that were tested in this study. In summary, measurement of tear lactoferrin concentration alone has not been shown to be a sufficiently sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of mild to moderately dry eye as defined by more common clinical techniques.
