Effects of general anaesthesia with an inhalational anaesthetic agent on the expression of exosomes in rats.

Background: We hypothesized that the expression of exosomes under general anaesthesia with an inhalational anaesthetic agent would be changed. The study was designed to confirm the effect of general anesthesia with an inhalational anaesthetic agent on the expression of exosomes in rats. Methods: After intraperitoneal administration for the mixture of ketamine and xylazine, tracheal intubation was performed. Just before the connection to ventilator, Control group and Anaesthesia group, according to anaesthesia with isoflurane, were allocated. The expressions of exosomes were checked in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), the blood and the tissues from the lung and the brain. Cytokines in the blood were also assessed. Results: The expressions of cluster of differentiation (CD)63 and CD81 as markers for the exosomes in the blood was increased after anaesthesia with isoflurane (CD63, 0.078 ± 0.057 % in Control group vs. 0.180 ± 0.036 % in Anaesthesia group, p = 0.02; CD81, 0.028 ± 0.034 % in Control group vs. 0.245 ± 0.054 % in Anaesthesia group, p < 0.01). However, the increased expression of them were not checked in BAL, and the tissues from the lung and the brain. The cytokines in the blood did not show any significant difference before and after anaesthesia with isoflurane. Conclusion: General anaesthesia with an inhalational anaesthetic agent increased the expression of exosomes in the blood. However, the change was limited in the blood, not the alveoli and the brain.

Expression Profiles of Immune Cells after Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Double-blind Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The antitumor effects of natural killer cells, helper T cells, and cytotoxic T cells after cancer surgery were reported previously. This study hypothesized that propofol-based anesthesia would have fewer harmful effects on immune cells than volatile anesthetics-based anesthesia during colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: In total, 153 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were randomized and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the fraction of circulating natural killer cells over time in the propofol and sevoflurane groups. The fractions of circulating natural killer, type 1, type 17 helper T cells, and cytotoxic T cells were investigated. The fractions of CD39 and CD73 expressions on circulating regulatory T cells were investigated, along with the proportions of circulating neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes. RESULTS: The fraction of circulating natural killer cells was not significantly different between the propofol and sevoflurane groups until 24 h postoperatively (20.4 ± 13.4% vs. 20.8 ± 11.3%, 17.9 ± 12.7% vs. 20.7 ± 11.9%, and 18.6 ± 11.6% vs. 21.3 ± 10.8% before anesthesia and after 1 and 24 h after anesthesia, respectively; difference [95% CI], -0.3 [-4.3 to 3.6], -2.8 [-6.8 to 1.1], and -2.6 [-6.2 to 1.0]; P = 0.863, P = 0.136, and P = 0.151 before anesthesia and after 1 and 24 h, respectively). The fractions of circulating type 1 and type 17 helper T cells, cytotoxic T cells, and CD39+ and CD73+ circulating regulatory T cells were not significantly different between the two groups. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in both groups remained within the normal range and was not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol-based anesthesia was not superior to sevoflurane-based anesthesia in terms of alleviating suppression of immune cells including natural killer cells and T lymphocytes during colorectal cancer surgery.