Impact of and Response to Cyberattacks in Radiation Oncology.

Cyberattacks on health care facilities are increasing and significantly affecting health care delivery throughout the world. The recent cyberattack on our hospital-based radiation facility exposed vulnerabilities of radiation oncology systems and highlighted the dependence of radiation treatment on integrated and complex radiation planning, delivery and verification systems. After the cyberattack on our health care facility, radiation oncology staff reconstructed patient information, schedules, and radiation plans from existing paper records and physicians developed a system to triage patients requiring immediate transfer of radiation treatment to nearby facilities. Medical physics and hospital information technology collaborated to restore services without access to the system backup or network connectivity. Ultimately, radiation treatments resumed incrementally as systems were restored and rebuilt. The experiences and lessons learned from this response were reviewed. The successes and shortcomings were incorporated into recommendations to provide guidance to other radiation facilities in preparation for a possible cyberattack. Our response and recommendations are intended to serve as a starting point to assist other facilities in cybersecurity preparedness planning. Because there is no one-size-fits-all response, each department should determine its specific vulnerabilities, risks, and available resources to create an individualized plan.

COMP Report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for CyberKnife® Technology.

The Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists (COMP), in close partnership with the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) has developed a series of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment. These guidelines outline the performance objectives that equipment should meet in order to ensure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. This particular TQC contains detailed performance objectives and safety criteria for CyberKnife® Technology. The quality control recommendations in this document are based upon previously published guidelines and the collective experience of all Canadian sites using this technology. This TQC guideline has been field tested at the newest Canadian CyberKnife installation site and includes recommendations for quality control of the Iris™ and InCise™ MLC collimation systems.

Using the ACR CT accreditation phantom for routine image quality assurance on both CT and CBCT imaging systems in a radiotherapy environment.

Image-guided radiation therapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is becoming routine practice in modern radiation therapy. The purpose of this work was to develop an imaging QA program for CT and CBCT units in our department, based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom. The phantom has four testing modules, permitting one to test CT number accuracy, slice width, low contrast resolution, image uniformity, in-plane distance accuracy, and high-contrast resolution reproducibly with suggested window/levels for image analysis. Additional tests for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and noise were added using the polyethylene and acrylic plugs. Baseline values were obtained from CT simulator images acquired on a Phillips Brilliance Big Bore CT simulator and CBCT images acquired on three Varian CBCTs for the imaging protocols most used clinically. Images were then acquired quarterly over a period of two years. Images were exported via DICOM and analyzed manually using OsiriX. Baseline values were used to ensure that image quality remained consistent quarterly, and baselines were reset at any major maintenance or recalibration. Analysis of CT simulator images showed that image quality was within ACR guidelines for all tested scanning protocols. All three CBCT systems were unable to distinguish the low-contrast resolution plugs and had the same high-contrast resolution over all imaging protocols. Analysis of CBCT results over time determined a range of values that could be used to establish quantitative tolerance levels for image quality deterioration. While appropriate for the helical CT, the ACR phantom and guidelines could be modified to be more useful in evaluating CBCT systems. In addition, the observed values for the CT simulator were well within ACR tolerances.

Direct aperture optimization for FLEC-based MERT and its application in mixed beam radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Despite promising research in modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT), an applicator to produce modulated electron beams and associated treatment planning software is still not commercially available. This work investigated an optimization process in treatment planning for the McGill few leaf electron collimator (FLEC) MERT delivery device. In addition, the possibility of combining MERT with photon fields was examined to investigate mixed beam radiotherapy. METHODS: A FLEC direct aperture optimization (DAO) method, in which FLEC apertures and weights were iteratively optimized was created. The authors evaluated the performance of DAO against our previous technique for generating FLEC plans and with commercially available photon beam optimization algorithms using a basic target and organ at risk geometry. The authors applied the DAO technique on a sarcoma treatment to evaluate clinical parameters. Finally, the authors examined the merit of mixing the DAO generated FLEC electron fields with photon fields to improve the dosimetry of the sarcoma treatment. RESULTS: In relation to the alternative plans, the DAO generated sarcoma MERT plan was competitive in its ability to reduce the dose to OAR but weaker in its ability to highly conform the dose to the target volume. The addition of photon fields improved the quality of the MERT plan in terms of OAR sparing and target conformality. CONCLUSIONS: The DAO approach yielded deliverable FLEC-based MERT plans with a limited number of fields. The approach combined with photon optimization added flexibility, where the mutual benefits of each radiation type was used in unison to improve plan quality.

Dose homogeneity specification for reference dosimetry of nonstandard fields.

PURPOSE: To investigate the sensitivity of the plan-class specific correction factor to dose distributions in composite nonstandard field dosimetry. METHODS: A cylindrical water-filled PMMA phantom was constructed at the center of which reference absorbed dose could be measured. Ten different TomoTherapy(®)-based IMRT fields were created on the CT images of the phantom. The dose distribution for each IMRT field was estimated at the position of a radiation detector or ionization chamber. The dose in each IMRT field normalized to that in a reference 10 × 10 cm(2) field was measured using a PTW micro liquid ion chamber. Based on the new dosimetry formalism, a plan-class specific correction factor k(Q(pcsr),Q) (f(pcsr),f(ref)) for each field was measured for two Farmer-type chambers, Exradin A12 and NE2571, as well as for a smaller Exradin A1SL chamber. The dependence of the measured correction factor on parameters characterizing dose distribution was analyzed. RESULTS: Uncertainty on the plan-class specific correction factor measurement was in the range of 0.3%-0.5% and 0.3%-0.8% for the Farmer-type chambers and the Exradin A1SL, respectively. When the heterogeneity of the central region of the target volume was less than 5%, the correction factor did not differ from unity by more than 0.7% for the three air-filled ionization chambers. For more heterogeneous dose deliveries, the correction factor differed from unity by up to 2.4% for the Farmer-type chambers. For the Exradin A1SL, the correction factor was closer to unity due to the reduced effect of dose gradients, while it was highly variable in different IMRT fields because of a more significant impact of positioning uncertainties on the response of this chamber. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have shown that a plan-class specific correction factor can be specified as a function of plan evaluation parameters especially for Farmer-type chambers. This work provides a recipe based on quantifying dose distribution to accurately select air-filled ionization chamber correction factors for nonstandard fields.

Comparison of modulated electron radiotherapy to conventional electron boost irradiation and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy for treatment of tumour bed boost in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare few leaf electron collimator (FLEC)-based modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) to conventional direct electron (DE) and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of tumour bed boost in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with breast cancer treated by lumpectomy and requiring post-operative whole breast radiotherapy with tumour bed boost were planned retrospectively using conventional DE, VMAT and FLEC-based MERT. The planning goal was to deliver 10Gy to at least 95% of the tumour bed volume. Dosimetry parameters for all techniques were compared. RESULTS: Dose evaluation volume (DEV) coverage and homogeneity were best for MERT (D(98)=9.77Gy, D(2)=11.03Gy) followed by VMAT (D(98)=9.56Gy, D(2)=11.07Gy) and DE (D(98)=9.81Gy, D(2)=11.52Gy). Relative to the DE plans, the MERT plans predicted a reduction of 35% in mean breast dose (p<0.05), 54% in mean lung dose (p<0.05) and 46% in mean body dose (p<0.05). Relative to the VMAT plans, the MERT plans predicted a reduction of 24%, 36% and 39% in mean breast dose, heart dose and body dose, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MERT plans were a considerable improvement in dosimetry over DE boost plans. There was a dosimetric advantage in using MERT over VMAT for increased DEV conformity and low-dose sparing of healthy tissue including the integral dose; however, the cost is often an increase in the ipsilateral lung high-dose volume.

Treatment of recurrent high grade gliomas with hypofractionated stereotactic image-guided helical tomotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Salvage treatment of high grade gliomas that progress after standard therapy of resection and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy includes repeat surgical resection, second line chemotherapy, re-irradiation, or often a combination of the above. We present a series on patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic image-guided helical tomotherapy and discuss the efficacy of this new technology in the treatment of high grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2005 and August of 2008, eight patients with recurrent high grade gliomas were treated with salvage radiation therapy using hypofractionated stereotactic image-guided helical tomotherapy after image documentation of disease progression. Median age was 48.5 years with 4 females and 4 males. Median KPS at time of treatment was 65. All patients had either Grade III or IV gliomas at time of treatment with previous history of involved field fractionated radiotherapy. Median total dose given was 2500cGy in 500cGy fractions. RESULTS: The median planning target volume was 69.5cm(3). Five of the eight patients were alive at the time of last follow-up with a median survival of 7.6 months. Radiographic documented control was seen in six of the eight patients with median local control of 4.6 months. Acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scores measured zero in all patients with only one patient requiring a reoperation following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated stereotactic image-guided helical tomotherapy provides an alternative to other stereotactic radiation therapy and radiosurgery options for treatment of recurrent high grade gliomas.

Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare left-sided whole breast conventional and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans were created for 10 consecutive patients. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), forward-planned IMRT (for-IMRT), and inverse-planned IMRT (inv-IMRT) used two tangent beams. For-IMRT utilized up to four segments per beam. For helical tomotherapy (HT) plans, beamlet entrance and/or exit to critical structures was blocked. Topotherapy plans, which used static gantry angles with simultaneous couch translation and inverse-planned intensity modulation, used two tangent beams. Plans were normalized to 50Gy to 95% of the retracted PTV. RESULTS: Target max doses were reduced with for-IMRT compared to 3DCRT, which were further reduced with HT, topotherapy, and inv-IMRT. HT resulted in lowest heart and ipsilateral lung max doses, but had higher mean doses. Inv-IMRT and topotherapy reduced ipsilateral lung mean and max doses compared to 3DCRT and for-IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: All modalities evaluated provide adequate coverage of the intact breast. HT, topotherapy, and inv-IMRT can reduce high doses to the target and normal tissues, although HT results in increased low doses to large volume of normal tissue. For-IMRT improves target homogeneity compared with 3DCRT, but to a lesser degree than the inverse-planned modalities.

A technique for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning with helical tomotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to develop an efficient and effective planning technique for stereotactic radiosurgery using helical tomotherapy. Planning CTs and contours of 20 patients, previously treated in our clinic for brain metastases with linac-based radiosurgery using circular collimators, were used to develop a robust TomoTherapy planning technique. Plan calculation times as well as delivery times were recorded for all patients to allow for an efficiency evaluation. In addition, conformation and homogeneity indices were calculated as metrics to compare plan quality with that which is achieved with conventional radiosurgery delivery systems. A robust and efficient planning technique was identified to produce plans of radiosurgical quality using the TomoTherapy treatment planning system. Dose calculation did not exceed a few hours and resulting delivery times were less than 1 hour, which allows the process to fit into a single day radiosurgery workflow. Plan conformity compared favorably with published results for gamma knife radiosurgery. In addition, plan homogeneity was similar to linac-based approaches. The TomoTherapy planning software can be used to create plans of acceptable quality for stereotactic radiosurgery in a time that is appropriate for a radiosurgery workflow that requires that planning and delivery occur within 1 treatment day.

A comparison of helical tomotherapy to circular collimator-based linear-accelerator radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To compare stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans for the treatment of patients with brain metastases generated using Tomotherapy and a circular collimator-based SRS approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients, previously treated with circular collimator-based radiosurgery, were replanned using Tomotherapy treatment planning software. Tomotherapy planning emphasized dose fall off peripheral to the target by allowing for inhomogeneous target coverage. Conformity and dose falloff were compared with the circular collimator-based plans using the following metrics: prescription isodose to tumor volume ratio, conformation number, and homogeneity index to assess effects on targets, whereas a combined conformity gradient index and the volume of the 12-Gy isodose volume were used to assess differences in dose to normal brain. RESULTS: Although a similar homogeneity index was achieved for both sets of plans, plan conformity was generally improved using the tomotherapy system whereas dose falloff at the target periphery was shallower. The 12-Gy isodose volume increased on average by 3.4 mL (range, -1.9 to +12.1 mL), for the 20 patients studied, but in spite of this, based on modeled predictions, the risk for symptomatic radiation necrosis associated with Tomotherapy SRS for each patient still falls within the clinically observed ranges for Gamma Knife SRS. CONCLUSION: Tomotherapy can be used to create treatment plans that meet the dosimetric and clinical requirements for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Quality assurance of an image guided intracranial stereotactic positioning system for radiosurgery treatment with helical tomotherapy.

The aim of this work was to determine the accuracy and precision of stereotactic localization and treatment delivery using a helical tomotherapy based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. A tomotherapy specific radiosurgery workflow was designed that exploits the system's on board megavotage CT (MVCT) imaging system so that it not only provides a pre-treatment volumetric verification image that can be used for stereotactic localization, eliminating the need for a patient-frame based coordinate system, but also supplies the treatment planning image. Using an imaging guidance based intracranial stereotactic positioning system, a head ring and tabletop docking device are used only for fixation, while image guidance is used for localization. Due to the unconventional workflow, a methodology for determining the localization accuracy was developed and results were compared to other linear accelerator based radiosurgery systems. In this work, the localization error using volumetric localization was found to be 0.45 mm +/- 0.17 mm, indicating a localization precision of 0.3 mm within a 95% confidence interval. In addition, procedures for testing the delivery accuracy of the Tomotherapy system are described. Results show that the accuracy of the delivery can be verified to within +/-1 voxel dimension. These results are well within conventional SRS tolerances and compare favorably to other linear accelerator based techniques.

Treatment planning to improve delivery accuracy and patient throughput in helical tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate delivery quality assurance (DQA) discrepancies observed for a subset of helical tomotherapy patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six tomotherapy patient plans were selected for analysis. Three had passing DQA ion chamber (IC) measurements, whereas 3 had measurements deviating from the expected dose by more than 3.0%. All plans used similar parameters, including: 2.5 cm field-width, 15-s gantry period, and pitch values ranging from 0.143 to 0.215. Preliminary analysis suggested discrepancies were associated with plans having predominantly small leaf open times (LOTs). To test this, patients with failing DQA measurements were replanned using an increased pitch of 0.287. New DQA plans were generated and IC measurements performed. Exit fluence data were also collected during DQA delivery for dose reconstruction purposes. RESULTS: Sinogram analysis showed increases in mean LOTs ranging from 29.8% to 83.1% for the increased pitch replans. IC measurements for these plans showed a reduction in dose discrepancies, bringing all measurements within +/-3.0%. The replans were also more efficient to deliver, resulting in reduced treatment times. Dose reconstruction results were in excellent agreement with IC measurements, illustrating the impact of leaf-timing inaccuracies on plans having predominantly small LOTs. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of leaf-timing inaccuracies on plans with small mean LOTs can be considerable. These inaccuracies result from deviations in multileaf collimator latency from the linear approximation used by the treatment planning system and can be important for plans having a 15-s gantry period. The ability to reduce this effect while improving delivery efficiency by increasing the pitch is demonstrated.

A comprehensive assessment by tumor site of patient setup using daily MVCT imaging from more than 3,800 helical tomotherapy treatments.

PURPOSE: To assess patient setup corrections based on daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) imaging for four anatomic treatment sites treated on tomotherapy. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Translational and rotational setup corrections, based on registration of daily MVCT to planning CT images, were analyzed for 1,179 brain and head and neck (H&N), 1,414 lung, and 1,274 prostate treatment fractions. Frequencies of three-dimensional vector lengths, overall distributions of setup corrections, and patient-specific distributions of random and systematic setup errors were analyzed. RESULTS: Brain and H&N had lower magnitude positioning corrections and smaller variations in translational setup errors but were comparable in roll rotations. Three-dimensional vector translational shifts of larger magnitudes occurred more frequently for lung and prostate than for brain and H&N treatments, yet this was not observed for roll rotations. The global systematic error for prostate was 4.7 mm in the vertical direction, most likely due to couch sag caused by large couch extension distances. Variations in systematic errors and magnitudes of random translational errors ranged from 1.6 to 2.6 mm for brain and H&N and 3.2 to 7.2 mm for lung and prostate, whereas roll rotational errors ranged from 0.8 degrees to 1.2 degrees for brain and H&N and 0.5 degrees to 1.0 degrees for lung and prostate. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in setup were observed between brain, H&N, lung, and prostate treatments. Patient setup can be improved if daily imaging is performed. This analysis can assess the utilization of daily image guidance and allows for further investigation into improved anatomic site-specific and patient-specific treatments.

Quality assurance of an image guided intracranial stereotactic positioning system.

This work reports on the development and testing of an intracranial stereotactic patient positioning system (ISPPS) for Tomotherapy. The ISPPS consists of the combination of a head frame, head frame couch interface (HCI), megavoltage CT (MVCT), and optical tracking camera system. Three quality assurance tests were designed to quantify the positioning system's ability to localize an intracranial target. The first two of these tests were designed to determine (a) the ability of the MVCT to detect a known shift applied to an anthropomorphic phantom and (b) the precision of fixing the phantom to the treatment couch via a head frame and specially designed head frame couch interface. A system verification test, using a phantom and EDR2 film, was used to determine the overall delivery precision through comparison of a measured dose distribution on film to calculated dose. The average net translational difference between a known shift applied to a phantom and that detected by MVCT image fusion was 0.62 mm. Setup reproducibility of the head frame was measured with both MVCT and optical tracking. The frame setup precision was found to be well within 1 mm for translations as well as rotations. A system delivery verification test in phantom using film showed spatial agreement between planned and delivered dose distributions to within 1 mm.

Dosimetric verification of helical tomotherapy for total scalp irradiation.

Total scalp irradiation is a treatment technique used for a variety of superficial malignancies. Helical tomotherapy is an effective technique used for total scalp irradiation. Recent published work has shown the TomoTherapy planning system to overestimate the superficial dose. In this study, the superficial doses for a helical tomotherapy total scalp irradiation have been measured on an anthropomorphic phantom using radiochromic and radiographic film as well as a new skin dosimeter, the MOSkin. The superficial dose was found to be accurately calculated by the Tomo-Therapy planning system. This is in contrast to recent reports, probably due to a combination of the smaller dose grid resolution used in planning and this particular treatment primarily consisting of beamlets tangential to the scalp. The superficial dose was found to increase from 33.6 to 41.2 Gy and 36.0 to 42.0 Gy over the first 2 mm depth in the phantom in selected regions of the PTV, measured with radiochromic film. The prescription dose was 40 Gy. The superficial dose was at the prescription dose or higher in some regions due to the bolus effect of the thermoplastic head mask and the head rest used to aid treatment setup. It is suggested that to achieve the prescription dose at the surface (< or =2 mm depth) bolus or a custom thermoplastic helmet is used.